Reagan Posted May 4, 2022 Report Posted May 4, 2022 From the article: "The reasons for the Left's perverse sexualizing of very young children make sense only if you are sexually neurotic. None of it makes sense if you are a rational, healthy, sexually normal person. For example, what is to be gained by first graders learning about drag queens and transsexuality? How is a child's life improved, how is the culture improved when children whose brains are not physically equipped to process such information get exposed to it? If it is the hope of sexualizers that children will be more accepting of perversity, to what end?" This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Quote
LumRaiderFan Posted May 4, 2022 Report Posted May 4, 2022 If the left were as concerned about the welfare of children as they say they are, they would be trying to put a stop to this sick policy advancement. But we all know they have no concern for children, even they know it. Strange that this type of crap doesn't seem to rile folks up like someone wanting to stop the killing of the unborn out of convenience...even on this forum. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.