Gigantic Wealth Transfer Incoming (Yeah, Another One..)

[InMAGAWeTrust]

As you can see below, both Team R and Team D continually implement policies and push monetary policies that benefit the 1%, while keeping the plebs arguing about gay rights, womens rights, immigrants, BLM, boogeyman #9183.

 

The first meaningful wealth transfer occurred  during the bush era housing bubble, then exploded with GFC bailouts (free money) and QE (easy money). During Obama years, rates were kept artificially low (easy money), further increasing the wealth gap. Trump era continues with more easy money interest rates (hurting seniors on fixed income), then of course wealth gap exploded yet again with trump bucks, PPP (literally free money), Covid bailouts. Next comes Biden with Biden bucks and more stimulus.

Once again, housing affordability has reached all time lows and we’re due for another BAILOUT once poo hits the fan

 

Anyways - most of you scholars have no idea what this even means so you can continue on with the culture war debates. Just sharing some datapoints in case a person or two wants to get their head out of their a… sand. Rich get richer, while convincing the hillbillies and social justice warriors that it’s the other persons fault that the middle class continues to shrink 
 

[LumRaiderFan]

1 hour ago, InMAGAWeTrust said:

As you can see below, both Team R and Team D continually implement policies and push monetary policies that benefit the 1%, while keeping the plebs arguing about gay rights, womens rights, immigrants, BLM, boogeyman #9183.

 

The first meaningful wealth transfer occurred  during the bush era housing bubble, then exploded with GFC bailouts (free money) and QE (easy money). During Obama years, rates were kept artificially low (easy money), further increasing the wealth gap. Trump era continues with more easy money interest rates (hurting seniors on fixed income), then of course wealth gap exploded yet again with trump bucks, PPP (literally free money), Covid bailouts. Next comes Biden with Biden bucks and more stimulus.

Once again, housing affordability has reached all time lows and we’re due for another BAILOUT once poo hits the fan

 

Anyways - most of you scholars have no idea what this even means so you can continue on with the culture war debates. Just sharing some datapoints in case a person or two wants to get their head out of their a… sand. Rich get richer, while convincing the hillbillies and social justice warriors that it’s the other persons fault that the middle class continues to shrink 
 

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

So what are you doing to fix this while we are busy arguing other issues?  Surely you have the fix.

[InMAGAWeTrust]

1 hour ago, LumRaiderFan said:

So what are you doing to fix this while we are busy arguing other issues?  Surely you have the fix.

Thanks for the smartA reply.
 

A great start would be to stop voting for scam artist businessmen (Trump) and establishment politicians (Hillary/Biden) and instead vote for people who have proven themselves to be actually successful businessmen (Romney, Youngkin). 

 

Another idea is to have the federal reserve completely independent from political influence, ie. Fake businessman Trump hammering Powell (and calling him names) to lower rates while the economy was already overheating. Even better, perhaps we go back to the gold standard, or implement another system where our patriotic leaders can’t just literally print money on a whim.

 

Now get back to the 20-page stolen election topic where you belong 

[Reagan]

16 minutes ago, InMAGAWeTrust said:

Thanks for the smartA reply.
 

A great start would be to stop voting for scam artist businessmen (Trump) and establishment politicians (Hillary/Biden) and instead vote for people who have proven themselves to be actually successful businessmen (Romney, Youngkin). 

 

Another idea is to have the federal reserve completely independent from political influence, ie. Fake businessman Trump hammering Powell (and calling him names) to lower rates while the economy was already overheating. Even better, perhaps we go back to the gold standard, or implement another system where our patriotic leaders can’t just literally print money on a whim.

 

Now get back to the 20-page stolen election topic where you belong 

OK, so you don't like career politicians like Biden and you don't like successful business people like Trump.  So who would you consider acceptable?  

[Englebert]

13 minutes ago, InMAGAWeTrust said:

Thanks for the smartA reply.
 

A great start would be to stop voting for scam artist businessmen (Trump) and establishment politicians (Hillary/Biden) and instead vote for people who have proven themselves to be actually successful businessmen (Romney, Youngkin). 

 

Another idea is to have the federal reserve completely independent from political influence, ie. Fake businessman Trump hammering Powell (and calling him names) to lower rates while the economy was already overheating. Even better, perhaps we go back to the gold standard, or implement another system where our patriotic leaders can’t just literally print money on a whim.

 

Now get back to the 20-page stolen election topic where you belong 

We already voted for a successful business man, and his performance was outstanding. But you and the nutcase Liberals threw a childish temper tantrum. Logic tells us that you and Liberals can't handle success, and are hell bent on keeping career political imbeciles in power. And you have the nerve to poste this crap blaming us instead of the real culprit...you. I'm guessing this is just your furthering attempts at comedy. I can't see how anyone with at least  three functioning brain cells could actually consider this a serious post.

[InMAGAWeTrust]

23 minutes ago, Englebert said:

We already voted for a successful business man, and his performance was outstanding. But you and the nutcase Liberals threw a childish temper tantrum. Logic tells us that you and Liberals can't handle success, and are hell bent on keeping career political imbeciles in power. And you have the nerve to poste this crap blaming us instead of the real culprit...you. I'm guessing this is just your furthering attempts at comedy. I can't see how anyone with at least  three functioning brain cells could actually consider this a serious post.

Take this BS to the stolen election topic you dufus 

[InMAGAWeTrust]

36 minutes ago, Reagan said:

OK, so you don't like career politicians like Biden and you don't like successful business people like Trump.  So who would you consider acceptable?  

Edited - for being mean. If you genuinely think trump is a great example of a successful businessman, then there’s really no point in further engaging with you.

Mitt Romney and Glenn Youngkin are great examples. Check their Wikipedia page if you want to read about their credentials. I really hope Glenn runs in 2024, or 2028.

[Englebert]

18 minutes ago, InMAGAWeTrust said:

Take this BS to the stolen election topic you dufus 

You should read the stolen election topic. I haven't read it yet but I'm quite certain you can learn something from it.

You got called out on your stupidity and all you can muster for a retort is something even a child would be embarrassed of making. You are "special".

Way to ruin your own topic.

[LumRaiderFan]

1 hour ago, InMAGAWeTrust said:

Thanks for the smartA reply.
 

A great start would be to stop voting for scam artist businessmen (Trump) and establishment politicians (Hillary/Biden) and instead vote for people who have proven themselves to be actually successful businessmen (Romney, Youngkin). 

 

Another idea is to have the federal reserve completely independent from political influence, ie. Fake businessman Trump hammering Powell (and calling him names) to lower rates while the economy was already overheating. Even better, perhaps we go back to the gold standard, or implement another system where our patriotic leaders can’t just literally print money on a whim.

 

Now get back to the 20-page stolen election topic where you belong 

That you show support for clowns like Romney and won't even acknowledge Trump's success (won't even bother to list again) is telling of your political and business ignorance.

And you haven't done anything about the problem so you're as much as a whiner about something you can't change as you claim others are.

Your answers are pie in the sky, it's like me sitting back and saying we should have term limits and line item veto, sounds great, ain't happening.

[LumRaiderFan]

1 hour ago, Englebert said:

We already voted for a successful business man, and his performance was outstanding. But you and the nutcase Liberals threw a childish temper tantrum. Logic tells us that you and Liberals can't handle success, and are hell bent on keeping career political imbeciles in power. And you have the nerve to poste this crap blaming us instead of the real culprit...you. I'm guessing this is just your furthering attempts at comedy. I can't see how anyone with at least  three functioning brain cells could actually consider this a serious post.

He's a Romney guy. 🙄

[Reagan]

35 minutes ago, InMAGAWeTrust said:

Edited - for being mean. If you genuinely think trump is a great example of a successful businessman, then there’s really no point in further engaging with you.

Mitt Romney and Glenn Youngkin are great examples. Check their Wikipedia page if you want to read about their credentials. I really hope Glenn runs in 2024, or 2028.

So, you can't help yourself by starting off being mean.  SMH.

Anyway, Romney has a noodle spine and couldn't even beat Yobama.  He had Reagan's template on beating a failed President and wouldn't use it.  Youngkin, on the other hand, so far what I've seen I would agree with you.

[InMAGAWeTrust]

Comical that Team R has shifted so far right (crazy) that Romney is considered liberal. Can’t help but laugh and feel bad for you blokes

[LumRaiderFan]

40 minutes ago, InMAGAWeTrust said:

Edited - for being mean. If you genuinely think trump is a great example of a successful businessman, then there’s really no point in further engaging with you.

Mitt Romney and Glenn Youngkin are great examples. Check their Wikipedia page if you want to read about their credentials. I really hope Glenn runs in 2024, or 2028.

Would Mitt have had us energy independent for the first time ever and at the lowest unemployment rates in decades?

No

[LumRaiderFan]

1 minute ago, InMAGAWeTrust said:

Comical that Team R has shifted so far right (crazy) that Romney is considered liberal. Can’t help but laugh and feel bad for you blokes

You only like Romney because he voted to impeach Trump (it's on Wikipedia), the TDS bond is tight.

[Englebert]

1 minute ago, InMAGAWeTrust said:

Comical that Team R has shifted so far right (crazy) that Romney is considered liberal. Can’t help but laugh and feel bad for you blokes

The kindergartener calling his teacher dumb. You are consistent with your childish remarks. Your replies will probably get better once you reach intellectual adolescence.

[Unwoke]

40 minutes ago, InMAGAWeTrust said:

Comical that Team R has shifted so far right (crazy) that Romney is considered liberal. Can’t help but laugh and feel bad for you blokes

Your embarrassing yourself Jussie.

[Reagan]

37 minutes ago, InMAGAWeTrust said:

Comical that Team R has shifted so far right (crazy) that Romney is considered liberal. Can’t help but laugh and feel bad for you blokes

But some are so far left that everything looks right to them. 

BTW, didn't Yobama pattern Yobamacare after Romneycare in commie Massachusetts?  Uh, yea!  Nothing good ever comes out of socialism.  

[CardinalBacker]

48 minutes ago, LumRaiderFan said:

Would Mitt have had us energy independent for the first time ever and at the lowest unemployment rates in decades?

No

It's even lower now.

[LumRaiderFan]

12 minutes ago, CardinalBacker said:

It's even lower now.

How about that energy independence?

Make your case for your guy.

BTW, those numbers aren't reliable, never are under a democrat president, even you know that.

It's skewed in favor of the democrat just like wartime deaths, covid deaths and yes, even unemployment numbers.

[Reagan]

11 minutes ago, CardinalBacker said:

It's even lower now.

What Biden policy caused this?

[LumRaiderFan]

3 minutes ago, Reagan said:

What Biden policy caused this?

Must have been the Keystone pipeline call.

[Unwoke]

The communist Biden Regime continues. Talk about transfer of wealth. Good ole Climate Crisis. We’re from the US government….we’re here to help.

 

 

[InMAGAWeTrust]

34 minutes ago, LumRaiderFan said:

How about that energy independence?

Make your case for your guy.

BTW, those numbers aren't reliable, never are under a democrat president, even you know that.

It's skewed in favor of the democrat just like wartime deaths, covid deaths and yes, even unemployment numbers.

Exhibit #5839292 - the poors and the dumbs fighting with each other.. claiming political parties like sports teams, while obviously missing the bigger picture 

 

I knew this topic was too advanced for this crowd, not sure why I bothered lol

[LumRaiderFan]

7 minutes ago, InMAGAWeTrust said:

Exhibit #5839292 - the poors and the dumbs fighting with each other.. claiming political parties like sports teams, while obviously missing the bigger picture 

 

I knew this topic was too advanced for this crowd, not sure why I bothered lol

Neither are we.

[Englebert]

28 minutes ago, InMAGAWeTrust said:

Exhibit #5839292 - the poors and the dumbs fighting with each other.. claiming political parties like sports teams, while obviously missing the bigger picture 

 

I knew this topic was too advanced for this crowd, not sure why I bothered lol

Again, the kindergartener calling his teacher dumb. Will it ever cease to be hilarious?

You "bothered" because you are arrogant. It's hilarious because you are not all that bright.