Jump to content

Being Wrong About Trump!

Reagan

By Reagan
in Political Forum

 Share

Recommended Posts

Boyz N Da Hood

Boyz N Da Hood

Posted
Posted
54 minutes ago, Unwoke said:

Your reading comprehension needs lots of work. It’s probably that Orange Glaze over your eyes that’s causing it. 
 

Two Michigan counties this week voted to reject the results of the 2020 presidential election. According to a report from

This is the hidden content, please
, Cass County and Alcona County GOP voted to recognize that the election was fraudulent.

The Gateway Pundit additionally reported that the following counties have also voted to reject the 2020 presidential election results:

  • Langlade, Iowa, Winnebago, and Calumet Counties in Wisconsin,
  • Ravalli and Lewis and Clark Counties in Montana.

These counties have joined the ranks of numerous groups around the country who have voted to decertify or reject the results of 2020 in light of increasing evidence of significant election fraud and irregularities.

 

I guess All of these counties around the country are rejecting the results just for the hell of it.  Your dedication to your stupidity is impressive.

Gateway pundit? 🤣, far right news source! Go ahead and tweet something or give us fox, WND or OANN article, its got to be true.... That's like giving CNN credit for their news SMH

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Boyz N Da Hood

Boyz N Da Hood

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, LumRaiderFan said:

I couldn’t stand Romney, still voted for him because he was the best choice in the end.

See how easy that was, seems like even thin skinned snowflakes could figure that out.

Romney better than Obama? Now Romney is a RINO etc according to the right, dude literally votes with the D's every chance he gets... now he was the better choice? you can't make this level of stupidity up

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LumRaiderFan

LumRaiderFan

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, 45thAND46thSucks said:

Romney better than Obama? Now Romney is a RINO etc according to the right, dude literally votes with the D's every chance he gets... now he was the better choice? you can't make this level of stupidity up

lol, my choice was referring to when Romney was running against Obama.

You seem to be the one that possesses high level stupidity, but we all have known that since your first post.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Unwoke

Unwoke

Posted
Posted
11 minutes ago, 45thAND46thSucks said:

Gateway pundit? 🤣, far right news source! Go ahead and tweet something or give us fox, WND or OANN article, its got to be true.... That's like giving CNN credit for their news SMH

The dedication to your stupidity is impressive also. I know facts are far right to you. Typical response, never addressing the facts. Just attack the messenger an show off your stupidity like usual. Lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LumRaiderFan

LumRaiderFan

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, 45thAND46thSucks said:

Let's see.... how bout tucker Carlson lying bout dead folks voting? Surely that rings a bell

And it has been proven by relatives that it has happened but I’ll go ahead and give you that one, even though it’s commentary and not hard news, which I wouldn’t expect you to know the difference.

Fox reports thousands of articles every week, surely you can come up with more than that if they’re not credible.

I’ll wait.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Boyz N Da Hood

Boyz N Da Hood

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, LumRaiderFan said:

And it has been proven by relatives that it has happened but I’ll go ahead and give you that one, even though it’s commentary and not hard news, which I wouldn’t expect you to know the difference.

Fox reports thousands of articles every week, surely you can come up with more than that if they’re not credible.

I’ll wait.

I can post link after link if you'd like

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Unwoke

Unwoke

Posted
Posted
13 minutes ago, 45thAND46thSucks said:

I can post link after link if you'd like

 

That’s your News Source?? 😂😂😂

Chopped up video of a interview being narrated by some kid who still probably lives with his parents.😂 

Your Dumber than I thought.  Smh

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Unwoke

Unwoke

Posted
Posted
12 minutes ago, 45thAND46thSucks said:

You think tweets are news LMMFAO 

Dumb dumb, Twitter is not a news publisher. Twitter is a platform where News articles from   different publishers can post what they deem as News or just a place for people to post different topics. The news articles are written by the publisher not Twitter dumb dumb.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Unwoke

Unwoke

Posted
Posted

This is coming from a Liberal Law Professor who voted for Hillary Clinton.

 

Dershowitz: Trump critics 'stretching the law' in push to 'get' former president

Rather than follow the letter of the law and the evidence wherever it leads, Democrats, academics, and other critics of Donald Trump are twisting the law in hopes of seeing the former president criminally charged as part of the Justice Department's probe into the Jan. 6 Capitol riot, according to renowned civil liberties lawyer Alan Dershowitz.

 

"The thing most upsetting to me as a liberal Democrat and civil libertarian is how hard they're searching for a crime," Dershowitz told Just the News in an exclusive interview. "It reminds me of [former head of the Soviet secret police] Lavrentiy Beria saying to Josef Stalin, 'Show me the man, and I'll show you the crime.'"

Dershowitz, professor emeritus at Harvard Law School, cited examples of prominent legal experts taking wild swings at Trump — everything from saying he 

This is the hidden content, please
 to murder former Vice President Mike Pence to 
This is the hidden content, please
 he's guilty of dereliction of duty — to argue he should be charged with a crime for his actions during the Jan. 6 Capitol breach and more broadly his efforts to challenge the results of the 2020 presidential election.

"What all these arguments have in common is they stretch the law however it needs to be stretched in order to get Trump," said Dershowitz, who said prosecution not grounded in the law sets a "dangerous" precedent. "Today they're targeting Trump. Tomorrow it could be Black Lives Matter, or union organizers, or even a progressive president when the roles are flipped."

Dershowitz's comments came a few days after the Washington Post 

This is the hidden content, please
 the Justice Department is investigating Trump's actions as part of its criminal probe into the storming of the Capitol and efforts to challenge the 2020 election results.

The report was published after Andrew Weissmann, one of the lead prosecutors in the Trump-Russia investigation, 

This is the hidden content, please
 the Justice Department for adopting a "bottom-up" criminal investigation by focusing primarily on Jan. 6 protesters rather than Trump and his top allies.

The Justice Department has arrested nearly 900 people for charges related to Jan. 6, imprisoning most without a trial. Several have 

This is the hidden content, please
 the FBI, Justice Department, and federal prison officials under the Biden administration violated their civil and constitutional rights. The vast majority weren't accused of carrying a weapon, assaulting law enforcement, or destroying property. Many didn't even enter the Capitol building.

The House select committee investigating Jan. 6 just finished a series of hearings over the summer aimed at portraying Trump as the central figure in an orchestrated plot to overturn the 2020 election and incite an insurrection.

In a departure from House norms, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) last year rejected two of the five House Republican picks for the committee, prompting Republican Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) to pull all five of his party's choices from the panel. Pelosi then handpicked two anti-Trump Republicans to join the seven Democrats on the committee.
 

The panel is currently considering whether to refer Trump to the Justice Department for criminal prosecution.

But even if the committee does make the referral, the Justice Department will disregard any conclusions reached by the committee, according to Dershowitz.

"The Justice Department will totally ignore any conclusions reached by the House committee," he said. "There was no cross examination ... It was a corrupt process for eliciting evidence. Never before have we seen a hearing like this where the other side was excluded and we only got a one-sided story."

Dershowitz added that Attorney General Merrick Garland won't ignore the actual evidence produced by the committee but will only indict with a "slam-dunk case and a smoking gun that would be accepted by the vast majority of Americans," as was the case with Richard Nixon.
 

With Trump, however, there's currently "no gun, not even a knife, just circumstantial inferences," said Dershowitz, who noted attempts by Democrats to omit the fact that Trump said in his speech to supporters on the day of the Capitol riot that they should protest "peacefully" and "patriotically."

Concerning other accusations leveled against Trump, Dershowitz said they would need to be proven beyond a reasonable doubt to result in a successful prosecution — a threshold he characterized as out of reach given the current evidence available.

Dershowitz made a point of distinguishing between criminal activity and actions people may find distasteful but aren't crimes. To prove the point, he cited allegations that Trump stood by idly on Jan. 6 and refused to call the National Guard to stop the riot — a claim that Just the News has 

This is the hidden content, please
 through extensive 
This is the hidden content, please
 in recent months.

"Let's just take the worst-case scenario and say Trump refused to call in the National Guard and watched the chaos unfold," said Dershowitz. "It wouldn't be a crime. It could be dereliction of duty or any range of sins," but not deserving of criminal charges.
 

"No crime is obvious here," said Dershowitz of Trump's conduct following the 2020 election. "This is just dirty politics, which has been part of the scene since Thomas Jefferson."

Dershowitz emphasized he's a man of the political left and would never vote for Trump in 2024 should he run but is bound by the law.

The situation would "change dramatically if there was evidence of tax evasion or a crime like that, but punishment for a political crime should be the American people voting you out of office," he added. "I don't want to be denied my right to vote against Trump in 2024."

The longtime Harvard professor explained that the last time "politics overtook law" was McCarthyism in the 1950s, when people were afraid to call out investigative misconduct out of fear of being branded a communist.
 

"Today, people are afraid of being branded a Trump supporter," he said. "Were Trump indicted, it would get much worse."

Dershowitz compared the current situation to the late Attorney General Robert Kennedy repeatedly trying to 

This is the hidden content, please
 Roy Cohn, with whom he had a decades-long feud. Cohn, a central figure in the McCarthy hearings of the 1950s, was 
This is the hidden content, please
 three times after three separate criminal indictments by the Kennedy Justice Department.

Concern over politics trumping the law in the potential prosecution of Trump comes amid 

This is the hidden content, please
 among legal experts against perceived Justice Department strong-arm tactics targeting skeptics of the 2020 presidential election outcome and other critics of the Biden administration.

Former Trump White House trade official Peter Navarro, for example, was publicly arrested by FBI agents at Reagan National Airport just outside Washington, D.C. last month on misdemeanor charges that he acted in contempt of Congress by defying a subpoena from the Jan. 6 committee.
 

According to Navarro, federal agents put him in handcuffs, leg irons, 

This is the hidden content, please
 him, denied him a chance to call his lawyer, and deprived him of food and water. The Justice Department has 
This is the hidden content, please
 those claims are false.

At a recent hearing in Navarro's case, the overseeing federal judge agreed federal agents used unnecessary force against Navarro, 

This is the hidden content, please
it was baffling that prosecutors didn't simply tell Navarro he was going to be charged and let him walk into an FBI office.

"Law enforcement seems to be using arrest tactics on Trump supporters that are generally reserved for violent and/or fleeing suspects," Dershowitz told Just the News earlier this month. "They do not seem justified in many of these cases."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Member Statistics

    46,207
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    JBarry68
    Newest Member
    JBarry68
    Joined


×
×
  • Create New...