Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

When a search warrant is issued and calls for a raid, they are saying that there's a chance that party being raided will destroy documents.  But, again, this is a last resort.  The mere fact that the warrant was issued Friday and not executed until Monday shows that this was a scam to begin with.  If they were actually concerned they would have raided after the warrant was issued.

Posted
47 minutes ago, 45thAND46thSucks said:

As divided as this country is, biden nor 1 term 45 will be on the ticket... bank on it

I hope your right, and while I'm 100% sure Biden won't seek re-election (I'm not sure he finishes this term), the jury is still out on Trump.  There's a large group of his followers, and a large group that can't stand him but won't stand up to him because they don't want to anger the red-hatted fools.  It's going to be a dem win if Trump runs, regardless of whether Trump gets the R nomination, in my opinion, anyways.  

 

Here's a thought... the Presidential Order of Succession.  You obviously have Biden as President.... but he's not promised tomorrow.  Then you have Kamala Harris as VP who would step in as POTUS if Biden was no longer able to fill the role and that's where it gets interesting.  If Harris became VP, then the Speaker of the House (Pelosi) would move into the VP slot.  BUT, if the House flips back to a Republican majority this fall, after Jan 1 a Republican would be in line for VP if Biden falters.  I wonder if we'll see movement in November of this year to have Biden step out, Kamala become President (what a feather in Biden's cap!) and Pelosi installed as VP before the new Speaker is sworn in after the first of the year... it would make a lot of sense because it's so likely that Biden won't finish his first term.  They already had a bad experience on the Supreme Court with RBG hanging around too long and it costing them a spot.  

 

Just something I thought of.

Posted

I'll play along.  Why Pelosi as VP?  Rockefeller was Ford's VP not the Speaker of the House.  

Curious as to why her.  

If Harris becomes President, wouldn't she likely be the Dem nominee in '24?  If so, she may prefer to already have her running mate in place. 

Quite sure she would never have Pelosi on the ticket. Age, national view of her, etc.   

Harris may also want a lesser "personality" than Pelosi. 

Posted
25 minutes ago, CardinalBacker said:

I hope your right, and while I'm 100% sure Biden won't seek re-election (I'm not sure he finishes this term), the jury is still out on Trump.  There's a large group of his followers, and a large group that can't stand him but won't stand up to him because they don't want to anger the red-hatted fools.  It's going to be a dem win if Trump runs, regardless of whether Trump gets the R nomination, in my opinion, anyways.  

 

Here's a thought... the Presidential Order of Succession.  You obviously have Biden as President.... but he's not promised tomorrow.  Then you have Kamala Harris as VP who would step in as POTUS if Biden was no longer able to fill the role and that's where it gets interesting.  If Harris became VP, then the Speaker of the House (Pelosi) would move into the VP slot.  BUT, if the House flips back to a Republican majority this fall, after Jan 1 a Republican would be in line for VP if Biden falters.  I wonder if we'll see movement in November of this year to have Biden step out, Kamala become President (what a feather in Biden's cap!) and Pelosi installed as VP before the new Speaker is sworn in after the first of the year... it would make a lot of sense because it's so likely that Biden won't finish his first term.  They already had a bad experience on the Supreme Court with RBG hanging around too long and it costing them a spot.  

 

Just something I thought of.

True, going to be interesting... if this country can't move away from these 2 folks and choose someone not so far right and left then we're doomed anyway

#someone new 2024

I agree if R's are so stuck up 1 terms ### that they don't see that DeSantis would wipe the map, pulling in undecideds minorities etc then they deserve to lose again JMO

Posted
46 minutes ago, CardinalBacker said:

I hope your right, and while I'm 100% sure Biden won't seek re-election (I'm not sure he finishes this term), the jury is still out on Trump.  There's a large group of his followers, and a large group that can't stand him but won't stand up to him because they don't want to anger the red-hatted fools.  It's going to be a dem win if Trump runs, regardless of whether Trump gets the R nomination, in my opinion, anyways.  

 

Here's a thought... the Presidential Order of Succession.  You obviously have Biden as President.... but he's not promised tomorrow.  Then you have Kamala Harris as VP who would step in as POTUS if Biden was no longer able to fill the role and that's where it gets interesting.  If Harris became VP, then the Speaker of the House (Pelosi) would move into the VP slot.  BUT, if the House flips back to a Republican majority this fall, after Jan 1 a Republican would be in line for VP if Biden falters.  I wonder if we'll see movement in November of this year to have Biden step out, Kamala become President (what a feather in Biden's cap!) and Pelosi installed as VP before the new Speaker is sworn in after the first of the year... it would make a lot of sense because it's so likely that Biden won't finish his first term.  They already had a bad experience on the Supreme Court with RBG hanging around too long and it costing them a spot.  

 

Just something I thought of.

The Constitutional line of succession is only for the presidency.  If a VP is Constitutionally put into the Presidency, he or she can pick who they want as VP.  If something happened to both the President and Vice President then the Speaker would become President.

Posted

You know it's getting bad when the Washington Post has to lie that Trump had nuclear documents that the FBI was looking for.  This un-American raid backfired so now they have to try a scare the people.   I'll tell you again:  The devil has got these people!

Posted
1 hour ago, 45thAND46thSucks said:

 

Top quote was what I asked how 1 term was a Christian etc...  re read your posts ant tell me how it doesn't refer to Conald... 

You said you'd rather have someone more Christian, then go on about the D's killing babies etc

Then call it TDS

SMFH

When I read the question and saw “1 term” I didn’t immediately think of Trump when I replied. How bout calling him Trump instead of 1 term, because there s been many 1 term presidents.  

I don’t know if Trump is a Christian or not but what I do know is that the right s platform and many policies are closer to Christianity then anything the left has to offer and that is the case no matter if it’s Trump desantis or any other conservative.

I’m a conservative, not a busher, trumper, or any other ‘ER’

 

 

 

Posted
13 minutes ago, 5GallonBucket said:

When I read the question and saw “1 term” I didn’t immediately think of Trump when I replied. How bout calling him Trump instead of 1 term, because there s been many 1 term presidents.  

I don’t know if Trump is a Christian or not but what I do know is that the right s platform and many policies are closer to Christianity then anything the left has to offer and that is the case no matter if it’s Trump desantis or any other conservative.

I’m a conservative, not a busher, trumper, or any other ‘ER’

 

 

 

👍🏽

Posted
1 hour ago, 45thAND46thSucks said:

If this is true, imagine Obama took nuke documents home from oval office... 

You really need to take down that Poster of Trump on the ceiling above your Bed. Ultra TDS 😂

Posted

BREAKING NEWS: FOX “News” is humiliated after NBC and New York Times confirm that, MONTHS ago, Trump DID receive a subpoena for the classified documents that he stole and stashed in Mar-a-Lago, but he defied it. RT IF YOU THINK THAT FOX “NEWS” IS A JOKE!

Posted
4 hours ago, CardinalBacker said:

I hope your right, and while I'm 100% sure Biden won't seek re-election (I'm not sure he finishes this term), the jury is still out on Trump.  There's a large group of his followers, and a large group that can't stand him but won't stand up to him because they don't want to anger the red-hatted fools.  It's going to be a dem win if Trump runs, regardless of whether Trump gets the R nomination, in my opinion, anyways.  

 

Here's a thought... the Presidential Order of Succession.  You obviously have Biden as President.... but he's not promised tomorrow.  Then you have Kamala Harris as VP who would step in as POTUS if Biden was no longer able to fill the role and that's where it gets interesting.  If Harris became VP, then the Speaker of the House (Pelosi) would move into the VP slot.  BUT, if the House flips back to a Republican majority this fall, after Jan 1 a Republican would be in line for VP if Biden falters.  I wonder if we'll see movement in November of this year to have Biden step out, Kamala become President (what a feather in Biden's cap!) and Pelosi installed as VP before the new Speaker is sworn in after the first of the year... it would make a lot of sense because it's so likely that Biden won't finish his first term.  They already had a bad experience on the Supreme Court with RBG hanging around too long and it costing them a spot.  

 

Just something I thought of.

Sounds as if you want that. The fools aren’t wearing the red caps, they follow a red bird. 

Posted

Wow, Trump has loyal followers. He gave his life for him.

 

FBI attacker was prolific contributor to Trump’s Truth Social website

Civil war and violence in support of the former president were frequent topics on an account opened in April and bearing the shooter’s name and photo

Posted

The AG may have pulled the trigger on the raid, but he got the go ahead from JoeBama.  Joebama told aids that he wanted Trump prosecuted. 

From the NY Slimes:  "Garland Faces Growing Pressure As Jan. 6 investigation widens.  "Mr. Biden confided to his inner circle that he believed former President Donald J Trump was a threat to democracy and should be prosecuted...  he has said privately that he wanted Mr. Garland to act less like a ponderous judge and more like a prosecutor who is willing to take decisive action over the events of Jan. 6.""

Like I've said -- this was a fishing expedition and another one of the Demoncrats famous hoaxes.  The other hoax didn't work, and this one will not work either.  But -- this one all but guarantees his re-election in 2024.  After seeing this pathetic show from the commie-libs, it's pulling those on the fence over for Trump!!

Posted
6 minutes ago, Reagan said:

The AG may have pulled the trigger on the raid, but he got the go ahead from JoeBama.  Joebama told aids that he wanted Trump prosecuted. 

From the NY Slimes:  "Garland Faces Growing Pressure As Jan. 6 investigation widens.  "Mr. Biden confided to his inner circle that he believed former President Donald J Trump was a threat to democracy and should be prosecuted...  he has said privately that he wanted Mr. Garland to act less like a ponderous judge and more like a prosecutor who is willing to take decisive action over the events of Jan. 6.""

Like I've said -- this was a fishing expedition and another one of the Demoncrats famous hoaxes.  The other hoax didn't work, and this one will not work either.  But -- this one all but guarantees his re-election in 2024.  After seeing this pathetic show from the commie-libs, it's pulling those on the fence over for Trump!!

Only in a cults mind can one believe this nonsense.. yall are something else

Posted
47 minutes ago, Big girl said:

Wow, Trump has loyal followers. He gave his life for him.

 

FBI attacker was prolific contributor to Trump’s Truth Social website

Civil war and violence in support of the former president were frequent topics on an account opened in April and bearing the shooter’s name and photo

You won’t condemn Muslims for the actions of a few murderers (Isis), but you will condemn all Trump supporters for this one guy. You’re a real pip. It must be terrible to be you. 

Posted
59 minutes ago, baddog said:

You won’t condemn Muslims for the actions of a few murderers (Isis), but you will condemn all Trump supporters for this one guy. You’re a real pip. It must be terrible to be you. 

It HAS to be terrible to call yourself a Dem.

Posted
2 hours ago, Big girl said:

If nothing was found. Why is Trump saying that the FBI planted evidence?

Have you been living under a Rock the last 5 years? Have you not seen the lying BS that people in our on government has put him through only to come out with egg on their face. 

Posted
2 hours ago, Big girl said:

Wow, Trump has loyal followers. He gave his life for him.

 

FBI attacker was prolific contributor to Trump’s Truth Social website

Civil war and violence in support of the former president were frequent topics on an account opened in April and bearing the shooter’s name and photo

😂😂😂Smh

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,282
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    Unknown472929300
    Newest Member
    Unknown472929300
    Joined
×
×
  • Create New...