Jump to content

VARSITY SCRIMMAGE SCHEDULE\TIMES WED. 8/17- THURSDAY 8/18


KF89

Recommended Posts

14 minutes ago, BADSANTA said:

What was the Silsbee vs OF score 

STiger85

  • Members
  • LocationIn the woods or on the lake

Silsbee v Orangefield

Controlled scrimmage-Silsbee 1TD, rush 11-86 (7.82 ypr), pass 5-10-73-1-0, penalties 3-25; Orangefield 0TD, rush 16-86 (5.37 ypr), pass 2-3-30-0-0, 1 turnover, penalties 1-5

Live scrimmage - Silsbee 2TD 14points, rush 17-124 TD (7.47 ypr), pass 3-8-42-1-0, 1 turnover, penalties 2-10; Orangefield 1TD 6points, rush 23-127 (5.52 ypr), 0-3-0-0, penalties 3-15 

A good physical scrimmage for both teams. Orangefield has some nice size lads on both sides of the ball and some scrappy RBs that don't quit. Both teams had some long runs and both teams showed they could grind it down the field. Silsbee defense had two goal line stands, one ended in a fumble and one in a missed FG. Silsbee's offense was more consistent this scrimmage, blocking and running. Good luck to both teams this season. TigerNation!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, KF89 said:

STiger85

  •  
  • Members
  • LocationIn the woods or on the lake

Silsbee v Orangefield

Controlled scrimmage-Silsbee 1TD, rush 11-86 (7.82 ypr), pass 5-10-73-1-0, penalties 3-25; Orangefield 0TD, rush 16-86 (5.37 ypr), pass 2-3-30-0-0, 1 turnover, penalties 1-5

Live scrimmage - Silsbee 2TD 14points, rush 17-124 TD (7.47 ypr), pass 3-8-42-1-0, 1 turnover, penalties 2-10; Orangefield 1TD 6points, rush 23-127 (5.52 ypr), 0-3-0-0, penalties 3-15 

A good physical scrimmage for both teams. Orangefield has some nice size lads on both sides of the ball and some scrappy RBs that don't quit. Both teams had some long runs and both teams showed they could grind it down the field. Silsbee defense had two goal line stands, one ended in a fumble and one in a missed FG. Silsbee's offense was more consistent this scrimmage, blocking and running. Good luck to both teams this season. TigerNation!!!

Who will start at RB for Silsbee? Martin?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,206
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    Ceb2000
    Newest Member
    Ceb2000
    Joined


  • Posts

    • Well Mustang fans it's time for my annual end of season rant. I've had so much company up here on the soapbox that I may have to start charging rent. After 3 years I don't think anything needs to be said. We all know what's wrong. We all know why. So what's the decision at the next board meeting? IMO, there's been enough imaginary success for the board to rubber stamp the Superintendent's vision for our future student athletes. #make every second count Due to soft scheduling and a weaker than normal district. The luck of knocking off 2 ranked opponents early when they were not healthy or still trying to figure it out. Also led to a premature ranking and a hollow DCTF weekly award. The 2 late season losses vs ranked teams proves what we know has been the biggest problem.  Football 19-15 .559 Baseball 9-35 .205 Basketball 19-35 .352 GBB 11-29 .275 Softball 1-22 .043 Volleyball 0-38 .000 Overall 59-174 .253   For anyone living in the district, I ask that you contact you're elected board members publicly and privately. Don't let them think this is exceptable. Be the solution to the equation. Not the divisor. This starts at the top and falls heavily upon those walking the halls. They deserve better.
    • I don't think it's 6-5 maybe 4-3
    • Sounds like a good idea, and something’s been needed for a long time. I know—where my kids & grandkids live now (DFW area)—schools are like revolving doors for athletic purposes. I don’t think the DPISD & LPISD option enrollment are anywhere like that. I assume it’s pretty above board since it was an arrangement apparently agreed to also by the state. I do know some kids that went to LPISD elementary schools in DP chose to go to DPHS because of the district rating. (Of course, at the time, DPISD and DP in general wasn’t very racially mixed like La Porte.) LPISD has a high number of kids on assistance programs compared to DP. Say what you will, it does make it more difficult for educational purposes and scores can reflect as much. LPISD is still rated high even with that challenge. Some of the kids that chose DPHS were very solid athletes that I’m sure LP would love to have had attend LPHS. Of course, part of the big rivalry between DP & LP has always been because DP ‘looked down’ on LP even though we worked side-by-side. Now that Shell DP refinery has been sold to PEMEX, DP is changing. Some aren’t happy about it. Some of us in LP are kinda tickled about it after the history.
    • Got my hotel booked...an hour away. They're having some kind of Light festival, so busy times in Nat.
    • payton missed dunk , and they go get a layup that play hurt 
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...