Jump to content

Homeless in Lumberton


5GallonBucket

Recommended Posts

If you ask me, this all started to get bad when soccer moms started filming themselves giving handouts to the homeless.  If they came to town and struck out (like those black people that tried to solicit donations at the four way in Mauriceville) they'll move onto greener pastures.   It's all of those "Be Kind" people that draw them in... it's like feeding those birds in the parking lots in Beaumont.  At the end of the day you just have a bunch more birds and everybody's car gets pooped upon.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, CardinalBacker said:

My understanding is that you have to apply for your permit if you'll be camping on private property for more than 48 hours.  I don't think you need one if you'll be camping for less than 48 hours.... and i took it to mean that you didn't have to have a permit before you started camping....just before 48 hours has elapsed. 

That’s how I took it

i don’t live in Lumberton but wouldn’t  happen on my property not even a second of camping PERIOD

Lumberton gonna end up like Bmt 

citizens better stand their ground

48 hours….who is the idiot that came up with that

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone who wishes to camp on private property has a 48-hour period to which they can apply for a city permit with the Lumberton Police Department.

TVC......Wouldn't this be simple trespassing?  I'm curious what they mean by private property.  How could the city issue a permit for private property?   Did I read this wrong?

Sorry, not sure why text so large

Edited by thetragichippy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, thetragichippy said:

Anyone who wishes to camp on private property has a 48-hour period to which they can apply for a city permit with the Lumberton Police Department.

TVC......Wouldn't this be simple trespassing?  I'm curious what they mean by private property.  How could the city issue a permit for private property?   Did I read this wrong?

Sorry, not sure why text so large

Trespassing requires that a person has been given “notice “ not to trespass.

But… Texas law defines what qualifies as a notice. Obviously if someone tells you to leave, that is notice. It is also notice if someone putd up a sign that says, get off my lawn!!

However, so is purple paint on trees marking a property line, fencing that is obviously intended to exclude intruders, fencing that obviously is intended to hold cattle or merely crops ready for harvest with no fencing or sign, etc.

Just as an example, lets say you are carrying a rifle which is legal but you cut across a watermelon patch with some melons ready to be picked. That is up to a year in jail for trespassing with a deadly weapon because you were given notice  

But, just being on someone’s property without permission is not trespassing unless the person has been given a warning like the ones listed. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Speaking of trespassing, typically trespassing carries up to six months in a county jail or as previously mentioned, up to a year if carrying a deadly weapon.

Any person in Lumberton or anywhere else whether an individual or a business, can have the police warning a person not to come back and if they do, file charges. The law does not require the police to witness such a warning but it gives a little more credibility if the police were there when the warning was given.

A City ordinance is a fine only. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,206
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    Ceb2000
    Newest Member
    Ceb2000
    Joined


  • Posts

    • It’s behind a paywall but here’s Baytown Sun’s story on it.  It was reported on in other papers statewide so if you search by the date I think you’ll find other stories on it. UIL strengthens student transfer rules By Ron McDowell [email protected] Oct 18, 2024   In order to maintain a level playing field for all member schools, the University Interscholastic League strengthened rules regarding transfer student eligibility at its most recent meeting in Austin. Every year thousands of students transfer schools in the state of Texas. A student’s ability to participate in UIL sanctioned activities may be limited base on the reasons for the transfer. A change in family status, work transfers, enrollment in an academic magnet program, or a move across town, receive scrutiny, but only rarely does one of these reasons result in the loss of eligibility. The only reason to automatically cause the loss of participation eligibility is a transfer for athletic purposes. The current rule, which has been in place since 1981, does not require a Previous Athletic Participation Form (PAPFs) to be submitted if the student-athlete does not participate in a varsity level sport during the first year of enrollment. There has been growing concern among some member schools, that other members are breaking the current rule and creating “super teams” with new transfer enrollees, and that the UIL is not doing enough to police, what appear to be, the inordinate number of transfers among high school athletes. To mitigate these concerns, the UIL approved a proposal to expand the power of the State Executive Committee (SEC) and allow it to investigate schools based upon the number of PAPFs submitted. Schools that submit an inordinate number of PAPFs would face heightened scrutiny and possible public reprimand and future sanctions. The UIL has also changed the requirements for PAPF submission, mandating that the form be submitted before a grade 9-12 transfer student may participate at any level of school athletics. This is a marked departure from the current policy which encourages schools not to complete PAPFs for students who transfer in, if the school believes that the student will not play a varsity sport in the first year the student is enrolled at the new school. Some critics of the current system think that the change doesn’t go far enough. Speaking on background, one local school district source suggested that there should be an automatic year wait for transfer students due to the number of loopholes in the waiver process. “If a student transfers, it should be a year out of competition automatically,” the source said. In addition, the UIL also approved a proposal that gives the SEC the power to appoint an independent administrator to oversee the conduct of the local District Executive Committee (DEC) if it is determined that the DEC is not consistently enforcing the rules of the governing body. The change is significant since all appeals that a school brings, starts and usually ends with the DEC. That includes the determination of transfer student eligibility. It is believed that with the implementation of this change, schools in a UIL district will be less likely to face retribution from the DEC chair and other members. The policy changes will go into effect, Aug. 1, 2025 This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  
    • I was hoping WOS was going to win. To get another chance to redeem ourself. Silsbee did not look good in that game and has not played consistent during the season. Hopefully against La Vega they will play 4quarters of football
    • This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up   GCCISD paid a firm called PASA to compile this report ahead of them closing/consolidating some schools and redrawing attendance zones.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...