Jump to content

Huffman at Silsbee Predictions


BADSANTA

Recommended Posts

Huffman managed a 1 point victory over a Legacy School for the physically impaired so if this is not an easy victory for the Tigers I’ll be surprised (again).  Legacy was soundly defeated by Splendora last year and they were terrible.  The score might be close to the Vidor debacle.  Depending on when the Tiger Coaches call off the dogs, I’d think minimum 21 points, and maximum whatever Silsbee wants it to be.  Year of the Tiger!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll take Silsbee in a close one at home over Huffman. 

 

Speaking of last year that Legacy School of Sports Sciences team must have gotten better as the year went on cause they won a state championship in whatever private school division they're in. But that was last year. 

 

Also this is Silsbee's Homecoming along with it being the first game at home, I don't think this one will go 100% smooth like last week. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Their record last year was 5-5 so I’m not sure how significant that SC was.  But with all the hoopla surrounding HC & new turf, there could be some distractions.  And after what happened to Vidor, Crosby and Nederland, this may be the year of surprises.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Hagar said:

Huffman managed a 1 point victory over a Legacy School for the physically impaired so if this is not an easy victory for the Tigers I’ll be surprised (again).  Legacy was soundly defeated by Splendora last year and they were terrible.  The score might be close to the Vidor debacle.  Depending on when the Tiger Coaches call off the dogs, I’d think minimum 21 points, and maximum whatever Silsbee wants it to be.  Year of the Tiger!

I wouldn't read too much into what Spring Legacy was last year. They have 3 D1 players on this years squad. I promise you Splendora doesn't wanna see them this year. That being said Silsbee is better for sure and is a tall order to say the least.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, FALCONS2026 said:

I wouldn't read too much into what Spring Legacy was last year. They have 3 D1 players on this years squad. I promise you Splendora doesn't wanna see them this year. That being said Silsbee is better for sure and is a tall order to say the least.

As a backer of this District, I hope the Falcons represents us well.  I thought the District was going to be stout this year but Vidor was complete disaster, and Ltown, even though they won, did not do so convincingly.  Maybe everyone will do better this week but Silsbee will be a tough test.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, raideroldtimer said:

True but in the mind a 42-28 win looks more like a blow out than a 14-0 victory. Same point difference bigger looking numbers.

Personally, I have never considered a 14 point win (regardless of score) a blowout. Too many factors involved.

I attended a game where one team led 35-0 going into the 4th Q. It was total domination by said team. They played the 4th with all their backup players and the other team scored 3 TD's to finish the game at 35-21. One could say that was a blowout (I would agree with that statement) only because of how the game was played.

I also saw a game where a team won 56-42. The losing team scored with 5 minutes left in game to cut the lead to 7 (49-42). Forced a 3 and out, got the ball back and drove down to the opponents 5 yard line with 25 seconds left on the clock. Next play was an interception that was returned 100 yards for TD. Game ended 56-42 but was far from being a blowout game. Both teams moved down the field against one another. In fact, the losing team actually had more offensive yards than the winning team. Kicking game and turnovers were the difference.

Just saying that 14 point wins, no matter if it's high scoring or not, is still too close to be considered a blowout in my opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, CardinalBacker said:

I haven't forgotten 2015 when Huffman was Silsbee's prom queen and the Tigers blew a big lead in the fourth and gave away the win.  Silsbee ought to win this one, but I think it could be a trap game.  New turf, homecoming, just shelled Vidor... I can see the Tigers not being focused.  

I guess we'll 

Here you go 😂😂😂😂

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, CardinalBacker said:

I haven't forgotten 2015 when Huffman was Silsbee's prom queen and the Tigers blew a big lead in the fourth and gave away the win.  Silsbee ought to win this one, but I think it could be a trap game.  New turf, homecoming, just shelled Vidor... I can see the Tigers not being focused.  

I guess we'll see. 

Silsbee never had a big lead in that game. Silsbee is the team that made a come back that fell just short losing by 3 points. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,206
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    Ceb2000
    Newest Member
    Ceb2000
    Joined


  • Posts

    • Here’s a link to another story about it This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up
    • It’s behind a paywall but here’s Baytown Sun’s story on it.  It was reported on in other papers statewide so if you search by the date I think you’ll find other stories on it. UIL strengthens student transfer rules By Ron McDowell [email protected] Oct 18, 2024   In order to maintain a level playing field for all member schools, the University Interscholastic League strengthened rules regarding transfer student eligibility at its most recent meeting in Austin. Every year thousands of students transfer schools in the state of Texas. A student’s ability to participate in UIL sanctioned activities may be limited base on the reasons for the transfer. A change in family status, work transfers, enrollment in an academic magnet program, or a move across town, receive scrutiny, but only rarely does one of these reasons result in the loss of eligibility. The only reason to automatically cause the loss of participation eligibility is a transfer for athletic purposes. The current rule, which has been in place since 1981, does not require a Previous Athletic Participation Form (PAPFs) to be submitted if the student-athlete does not participate in a varsity level sport during the first year of enrollment. There has been growing concern among some member schools, that other members are breaking the current rule and creating “super teams” with new transfer enrollees, and that the UIL is not doing enough to police, what appear to be, the inordinate number of transfers among high school athletes. To mitigate these concerns, the UIL approved a proposal to expand the power of the State Executive Committee (SEC) and allow it to investigate schools based upon the number of PAPFs submitted. Schools that submit an inordinate number of PAPFs would face heightened scrutiny and possible public reprimand and future sanctions. The UIL has also changed the requirements for PAPF submission, mandating that the form be submitted before a grade 9-12 transfer student may participate at any level of school athletics. This is a marked departure from the current policy which encourages schools not to complete PAPFs for students who transfer in, if the school believes that the student will not play a varsity sport in the first year the student is enrolled at the new school. Some critics of the current system think that the change doesn’t go far enough. Speaking on background, one local school district source suggested that there should be an automatic year wait for transfer students due to the number of loopholes in the waiver process. “If a student transfers, it should be a year out of competition automatically,” the source said. In addition, the UIL also approved a proposal that gives the SEC the power to appoint an independent administrator to oversee the conduct of the local District Executive Committee (DEC) if it is determined that the DEC is not consistently enforcing the rules of the governing body. The change is significant since all appeals that a school brings, starts and usually ends with the DEC. That includes the determination of transfer student eligibility. It is believed that with the implementation of this change, schools in a UIL district will be less likely to face retribution from the DEC chair and other members. The policy changes will go into effect, Aug. 1, 2025 This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  
    • I was hoping WOS was going to win. To get another chance to redeem ourself. Silsbee did not look good in that game and has not played consistent during the season. Hopefully against La Vega they will play 4quarters of football
    • This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up   GCCISD paid a firm called PASA to compile this report ahead of them closing/consolidating some schools and redrawing attendance zones.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...