Jump to content

Friendly Reminder About Forum Rules


bullets13

Recommended Posts

Football season is upon us, and it’s the time of year where posters get all up in their feels and start breaking forum rules.  I encourage everyone to read through them if they’re new to the site, or if maybe it’s been awhile and you need a refresher.  To help you out, I’ll go over a few of the ones that usually get broken here for your reading pleasure, and even provide a few examples for you: 

No profanity.  This includes using symbols.  Obviously not all profanity is created equal, but for certain words, or for using them to describe someone else, you’ll catch a ban pretty quick.  

Keep it civil:  no abusive or racial comments.  
acceptable: I disagree with that.  
unacceptable: you’re an idiot.  
acceptable: you’re wrong about that. 
unacceptable: You’re an idiot. 
acceptable: quit asking me the same thing over and over.  
unacceptable: I’ll answer you when your mom leaves. 
I think y’all get the point here.  
 

Stick to the topic.  This can get a little fuzzy at times, and it’s okay to bring up someone’s comments on a previous thread, within reason. 
acceptable: when this team played last week you were saying something different. 
unacceptable: in the Benghazi thread on the political forum you made  a point I disagree with.  
Acceptable: LCM is down 10.  If they lose and we win this one, we’re tied for first in district!
unacceptable: I just saw that Carthage is up 35 on Marshall.  They’d destroy this team if they played. 
again, use common sense. 
 

and finally, and probably most importantly, no bashing of teams, coaches, individual players, or communities. 

acceptable: the quarterback is struggling with his accuracy today.  
Unacceptable: this quarterback is garbage.  Bench him!

acceptable: the secondary can’t cover their receivers. 
Unacceptable: man, their wide receivers are torching #3!

acceptable: I don’t like coach Harris’ game-plan. 
Unacceptable: this coach is a moron! Fire him! 

acceptable: I think Johnson is a better option at running back.
unacceptable: this team isn’t going to win until they quit handing the ball off to Williams.  

acceptable: Hamshire Fannett doesn’t have enough parking, and needs turf. 
Unacceptable: The HF stadium sucks.  They should bulldoze it. 

acceptable: this is a tough matchup for Williams.  
unacceptable: Williams isn’t good enough to be on the field in this one.  He’s single-handedly losing the game for us. 

acceptable: it seems like we have to problems with the fans every time we go to Caneyhead.  
Unacceptable: everyone who lives in Caneyhead is white trash.  

Use your common sense here once again. It’s understandable to get frustrated with teams, players, facilities, and communities.  If you can’t find a way to respectfully make your point, just keep it to yourself.

 

i appreciate your time here, gentlemen.  Here’s to a great season of SETX football, and an enjoyable season of posting on the best sports site in Texas! 

 


 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, WOSdrummer99 said:

The one that stumps me is caneyhead? I always thought it was extremely derogatory, almost to the point of being a racial slur. Apparently it's acceptable. Maybe it's OK to refer to the area, but not to call someone a caneyhead? Doubt I've ever even been there, maybe drove thru and missed the stop sign. Idk

It's a place that people are from.  It some circles it might be considered derogatory to say someone is from there?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, WOSdrummer99 said:

The one that stumps me is caneyhead? I always thought it was extremely derogatory, almost to the point of being a racial slur. Apparently it's acceptable. Maybe it's OK to refer to the area, but not to call someone a caneyhead? Doubt I've ever even been there, maybe drove thru and missed the stop sign. Idk

It’s even a badge of honor for some. I was there all weekend. Lol. It’s comparable to saying “Yeah, they’re from Vidor…”

Not too many years ago, it was almost derogatory. I guess it’s in the eye of the beholder. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I never understood the Caneyhead thing... it's not bad at all as evidenced by the fact that a lot of people kinda low-key brag about it.  "My grandma lived in Caneyhead and we spent a lot of time there growing up.  So you could kinda say I'm from Caneyhead, too."

We lived in Leggett/Seven Oaks for a while growing up.  Nobody even wants to admit that they're from Leggett.  It's just different. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, WOSdrummer99 said:

The one that stumps me is caneyhead? I always thought it was extremely derogatory, almost to the point of being a racial slur. Apparently it's acceptable. Maybe it's OK to refer to the area, but not to call someone a caneyhead? Doubt I've ever even been there, maybe drove thru and missed the stop sign. Idk

it's an area near Fred/Spurger on Highway 92 . Dam B lake /Neches river. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, CardinalBacker said:

I never understood the Caneyhead thing... it's not bad at all as evidenced by the fact that a lot of people kinda low-key brag about it.  "My grandma lived in Caneyhead and we spent a lot of time there growing up.  So you could kinda say I'm from Caneyhead, too."

We lived in Leggett/Seven Oaks for a while growing up.  Nobody even wants to admit that they're from Leggett.  It's just different. 

lol if about an hour drive between the two is close enough for ya to gain citizenship then so be it. 🙂

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Dirty_but_Dazzling said:

it's an area near Fred/Spurger on Highway 92 . Dam B lake /Neches river. 

Caneyhead proper is actually between Silsbee and Fred. From FM 1122 north on FM 92 to Tyler County line is considered Caneyhead. Also, most folks only consider Caneyhead residents to be on the east side of 92. West side is considered Drakeville.

I know this area very well being I spent a lot of my time in and out of there with friends, classmates and girls. All Caneyhead residents attended Silsbee schools (if they went to school).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, AggiesAreWe said:

Caneyhead proper is actually between Silsbee and Fred. From FM 1122 north on FM 92 to Tyler County line is considered Caneyhead. Also, most folks only consider Caneyhead residents to be on the east side of 92. West side is considered Drakeville.

I know this area very well being I spent a lot of my time in and out of there with friends, classmates and girls. All Caneyhead residents attended Silsbee schools (if they went to school).

You are correct, lol. And to be completely transparent, I was at Beech Creek HC in Drakeville - not necessarily Caney Head (although the two kind of meld together in that area...).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • AggiesAreWe unpinned this topic
  • 2 years later...

Bringing this back up to the top because some folks seem to be a little sore about being told that they can't abuse their coaches without consequences.  Use common sense, folks.  We're all adults. It's really not difficult to voice your disapproval of a coach's decisions without insulting or bashing him.  Bashing and criticism are not the same thing.  "I don't like his gameplan" and "this guy is a moron" are not the same thing. Nobody is going to kick you off of the site for saying something critical, but you have to figure out a way to be tactful and respectful.  If you can't, as we've said before, save those comments for the facebook community watch page or something.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, bullets13 said:

Bringing this back up to the top because some folks seem to be a little sore about being told that they can't abuse their coaches without consequences.  Use common sense, folks.  We're all adults. It's really not difficult to voice your disapproval of a coach's decisions without insulting or bashing him.  Bashing and criticism are not the same thing.  "I don't like his gameplan" and "this guy is a moron" are not the same thing. Nobody is going to kick you off of the site for saying something critical, but you have to figure out a way to be tactful and respectful.  If you can't, as we've said before, save those comments for the facebook community watch page or something.

Thank you. And wouldn't the same be applied for poster to poster comments? I'm more sick of that than anything...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SmashMouth said:

It was more of a rhetorical question to be used as an additional reminder. I don't mind a little ribbing and having a good time, but I've gotten to the point that the meanness is really over the top sometimes.

Particularly down in the gutter, uh, political forum.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LumRaiderFan said:

Single out the problem(s) and remove them.  There have been plenty of folks that have enjoyed the back and forth and kept it amicable.

As in remove the members creating the problems? 

I don't think you would like that too much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,206
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    Ceb2000
    Newest Member
    Ceb2000
    Joined


  • Posts

    • It’s behind a paywall but here’s Baytown Sun’s story on it.  It was reported on in other papers statewide so if you search by the date I think you’ll find other stories on it. UIL strengthens student transfer rules By Ron McDowell [email protected] Oct 18, 2024   In order to maintain a level playing field for all member schools, the University Interscholastic League strengthened rules regarding transfer student eligibility at its most recent meeting in Austin. Every year thousands of students transfer schools in the state of Texas. A student’s ability to participate in UIL sanctioned activities may be limited base on the reasons for the transfer. A change in family status, work transfers, enrollment in an academic magnet program, or a move across town, receive scrutiny, but only rarely does one of these reasons result in the loss of eligibility. The only reason to automatically cause the loss of participation eligibility is a transfer for athletic purposes. The current rule, which has been in place since 1981, does not require a Previous Athletic Participation Form (PAPFs) to be submitted if the student-athlete does not participate in a varsity level sport during the first year of enrollment. There has been growing concern among some member schools, that other members are breaking the current rule and creating “super teams” with new transfer enrollees, and that the UIL is not doing enough to police, what appear to be, the inordinate number of transfers among high school athletes. To mitigate these concerns, the UIL approved a proposal to expand the power of the State Executive Committee (SEC) and allow it to investigate schools based upon the number of PAPFs submitted. Schools that submit an inordinate number of PAPFs would face heightened scrutiny and possible public reprimand and future sanctions. The UIL has also changed the requirements for PAPF submission, mandating that the form be submitted before a grade 9-12 transfer student may participate at any level of school athletics. This is a marked departure from the current policy which encourages schools not to complete PAPFs for students who transfer in, if the school believes that the student will not play a varsity sport in the first year the student is enrolled at the new school. Some critics of the current system think that the change doesn’t go far enough. Speaking on background, one local school district source suggested that there should be an automatic year wait for transfer students due to the number of loopholes in the waiver process. “If a student transfers, it should be a year out of competition automatically,” the source said. In addition, the UIL also approved a proposal that gives the SEC the power to appoint an independent administrator to oversee the conduct of the local District Executive Committee (DEC) if it is determined that the DEC is not consistently enforcing the rules of the governing body. The change is significant since all appeals that a school brings, starts and usually ends with the DEC. That includes the determination of transfer student eligibility. It is believed that with the implementation of this change, schools in a UIL district will be less likely to face retribution from the DEC chair and other members. The policy changes will go into effect, Aug. 1, 2025 This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  
    • I was hoping WOS was going to win. To get another chance to redeem ourself. Silsbee did not look good in that game and has not played consistent during the season. Hopefully against La Vega they will play 4quarters of football
    • This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up   GCCISD paid a firm called PASA to compile this report ahead of them closing/consolidating some schools and redrawing attendance zones.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...