Jump to content

fort bend marshall at crosby sept 1


lcm93

Recommended Posts

16 minutes ago, Mr. Buddy Garrity said:

Was Klein that good last week or FBM that bad?? 14-7 was kinda odd. At least FBM won though. 

Looks like FBM had a sloppy game against a 6A opponent and was still leading 14-0 in the 4th quarter. FBM turned the ball over 3 times due to fumbles , but out gained Klein 352 yards to 179.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • WOSdrummer99 changed the title to fort bend marshall at crosby sept 1

Well, we'll see what happens tonight. We're still going to be down seven starters and potentially eight depending on how you want to look at it. Hard to get a good evaluation on the team when we're missing so many impact players. Throw in the fact that none of the transfers are eligible yet and it makes us even shorter on depth. Hopefully the drop in competition allows us to play a little better tonight but it doesn't look like any of the injured players will be allowed to suit up until at least the BH game. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/29/2022 at 10:45 AM, Mr. Buddy Garrity said:

Ahhhhhh. Ok, makes sense now. 

FB Marshall hit a slant to Banks for 95 yards on their first offensive play and then basically stalled the rest of the game. Klein was better than FB Marshall at the line of scrimmage and could've scored a lot more points but their QB can't hit the side of a barn. FBM was playing solid defense though. 

At the beginning of the year I said if FB Marshall moved Jakoby Banks to wide receiver they might start to look like closer to those '18 and '19 teams. Last year they didn't have very good QB play and the kid they have they have now wasn't overly impressive against Klein but I assume it was his first career start. With guys out we don't have anybody that can stick Banks so that's a concern but I also think our offense will have a better day, particularly Myles, without five huge D1 kids collapsing the pocket on him. I think he was 5/13 for 46 yards 1/1 and had -4 yards rushing but again, it's hard to make anything of that when his two playmakers are missing on the outside. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/30/2022 at 8:19 PM, Justafan72 said:

Keep the faith Cougs ! Two powerful 6A teams in a row maybe was too much of a reach.They will bounce back.

That's the crazy part. We looked so solid against Lamar and then in a span of two weeks we get 8 kids hurt. We even have some backups of the hurt players hurt. I don't even think some of the kids we had playing last week were even listed in the program? It is what it is though, we won't see anything else like Lamar or King on the schedule this year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Unwoke said:

Did you know that he can bench press 400lbs of Crawfish? 

Y'all probably need to get in the weight room too. With it being as stormy as it is I'm sure y'all could use the extra strength to tie your houses down. Y'all can't afford for much more of your population to float away before y'all drop another class. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Member Statistics

    46,206
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    Ceb2000
    Newest Member
    Ceb2000
    Joined


  • Posts

    • Like I said, even if it’s only 10% of the 100 kids BHISD takes from GCCISD each year, that’s 10 athletes per year and that’s being generous.  You’re right about the jobs with BHISD, BTW.  There’s more than 1 athlete from Baytown originally who got transferred to BHISD after a job opened up for Mama.
    • Here’s a link to another story about it This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up
    • It’s behind a paywall but here’s Baytown Sun’s story on it.  It was reported on in other papers statewide so if you search by the date I think you’ll find other stories on it. UIL strengthens student transfer rules By Ron McDowell [email protected] Oct 18, 2024   In order to maintain a level playing field for all member schools, the University Interscholastic League strengthened rules regarding transfer student eligibility at its most recent meeting in Austin. Every year thousands of students transfer schools in the state of Texas. A student’s ability to participate in UIL sanctioned activities may be limited base on the reasons for the transfer. A change in family status, work transfers, enrollment in an academic magnet program, or a move across town, receive scrutiny, but only rarely does one of these reasons result in the loss of eligibility. The only reason to automatically cause the loss of participation eligibility is a transfer for athletic purposes. The current rule, which has been in place since 1981, does not require a Previous Athletic Participation Form (PAPFs) to be submitted if the student-athlete does not participate in a varsity level sport during the first year of enrollment. There has been growing concern among some member schools, that other members are breaking the current rule and creating “super teams” with new transfer enrollees, and that the UIL is not doing enough to police, what appear to be, the inordinate number of transfers among high school athletes. To mitigate these concerns, the UIL approved a proposal to expand the power of the State Executive Committee (SEC) and allow it to investigate schools based upon the number of PAPFs submitted. Schools that submit an inordinate number of PAPFs would face heightened scrutiny and possible public reprimand and future sanctions. The UIL has also changed the requirements for PAPF submission, mandating that the form be submitted before a grade 9-12 transfer student may participate at any level of school athletics. This is a marked departure from the current policy which encourages schools not to complete PAPFs for students who transfer in, if the school believes that the student will not play a varsity sport in the first year the student is enrolled at the new school. Some critics of the current system think that the change doesn’t go far enough. Speaking on background, one local school district source suggested that there should be an automatic year wait for transfer students due to the number of loopholes in the waiver process. “If a student transfers, it should be a year out of competition automatically,” the source said. In addition, the UIL also approved a proposal that gives the SEC the power to appoint an independent administrator to oversee the conduct of the local District Executive Committee (DEC) if it is determined that the DEC is not consistently enforcing the rules of the governing body. The change is significant since all appeals that a school brings, starts and usually ends with the DEC. That includes the determination of transfer student eligibility. It is believed that with the implementation of this change, schools in a UIL district will be less likely to face retribution from the DEC chair and other members. The policy changes will go into effect, Aug. 1, 2025 This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  
    • I was hoping WOS was going to win. To get another chance to redeem ourself. Silsbee did not look good in that game and has not played consistent during the season. Hopefully against La Vega they will play 4quarters of football
    • This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up   GCCISD paid a firm called PASA to compile this report ahead of them closing/consolidating some schools and redrawing attendance zones.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...