Jump to content

Santa Fe (34) @ Vidor (22) FINAL


jdawg03

Recommended Posts

46 minutes ago, Cherokee88 said:

I think that blind team beat a good Orangefield team tonight, I would be careful writing the pirates off just yet. 

Spring Legacy just coming off a state championship. Maybe ppl shouldn't have written them off. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Cougar14.2 said:

Me neither. You know I cheer for the underdog. They just have a couple of posters that always feel the need to slide in Crosby’s threads and provide non-football commentary. 

But yet here both of are in the Vidor thread. One of you I haven’t even said anything too. But I know that Bromance is powerful. 😂

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, Unwoke said:

But yet here both of are in the Vidor thread. One of you I haven’t even said anything too. But I know that Bromance is powerful. 😂

It’s cool to take shots at other teams, that’s one of the things the board is for. It’s different to badger a situation though, especially with non-football commentary. Y’all are 0-2 with two real bad losses, I know how disturbed you are. We’ve been there. The last thing you need me doing while y’all are in here talking football is making a bunch of unnecessary comments. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Cougar14.2 said:

It’s cool to take shots at other teams, that’s one of the things the board is for. It’s different to badger a situation though, especially with non-football commentary. Y’all are 0-2 with two real bad losses, I know how disturbed you are. We’ve been there. The last thing you need me doing while y’all are in here talking football is making a bunch of unnecessary comments. 

Not disturbed at all. Lol .  I see our team for what it is an support them regardless. I don’t take none of the Jibberish on this board too serious. Laughter is food for the soul an you provide a buffet of it with your mouth. I love taking shots at you only because your so mouthy an full of yourself. The fact that you had to let everyone on this board know you can bench 400lbs is my all time juvenile favorite! Lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Unwoke said:

Not disturbed at all. Lol .  I see our team for what it is an support them regardless. I don’t take none of the Jibberish on this board too serious. Laughter is food for soul an you provide a buffet of it with your mouth. I love taking shots at you only because your so mouthy an full of yourself. The fact that you had to let everyone on this board know you can bench 400lbs is my all time juvenile favorite! Lol

SMH, yet you don’t remember what triggers that response? How about I never again comment in a Vidor thread and you never again comment in a Crosby thread? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is it all about wins & losses?  Santa Fe is 2-0 and Crosby is 1-1.  Cougars did manage an OT win against a smaller division Team.  Maybe Crosby fans should be concerned about the Cougars this year & not the Pirates, but the fact Vidor is the only area Team Crosby hasn’t dominated has the hatred running deep.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Hagar said:

Is it all about wins & losses?  Santa Fe is 2-0 and Crosby is 1-1.  Cougars did manage an OT win against a smaller division Team.  Maybe Crosby fans should be concerned about the Cougars this year & not the Pirates, but the fact Vidor is the only area Team Crosby hasn’t dominated has the hatred running deep.

Pump the brakes on that last comment or be more specific on the timeline of said dominance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, AggiesAreWe said:

Pump the brakes on that last comment or be more specific on the timeline of said dominance.

Unless I missed something, Crosby has more wins than losses against Ned & PNG (and PAM?) while they’re.500 vs Vidor.  I was comparing the ones who played Crosby relatively often - District contest or in playoffs.

Now if you know a team that’s played them often enough to allow the phrase “dominate”, maybe you can be specific.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Hagar said:

Unless I missed something, Crosby has more wins than losses against Ned & PNG (and PAM?) while they’re.500 vs Vidor.  I was comparing the ones who played Crosby relatively often - District contest or in playoffs.

Now if you know a team that’s played them often enough to allow the phrase “dominate”, maybe you can be specific.

If you are talking entire history (not just recently) I know that Silsbee is 9-2 all time vs. Crosby.

A few other teams from back in the day had their way with Crosby.

Like I said, be more specific with your timeline.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, AggiesAreWe said:

If you are talking entire history (not just recently) I know that Silsbee is 9-2 all time vs. Crosby.

A few other teams from back in the day had their way with Crosby.

Like I said, be more specific with your timeline.

Lmbo, were those games played in the Roman Colosseum?  Okay, prior to the last ice age.  
😂😂😂☠️☠️🤣☠️☠️😂😂😂

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Hagar said:

Lmbo, were those games played in the Roman Colosseum?  Okay, prior to the last ice age.  
😂😂😂☠️☠️🤣☠️☠️😂😂😂

You made a blanket statement. Just needed clarification. Otherwise it was inaccurate.

There is a such thing as "all time series" record. Doesn't specify a certain time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, AggiesAreWe said:

If you are talking entire history (not just recently) I know that Silsbee is 9-2 all time vs. Crosby.

A few other teams from back in the day had their way with Crosby.

Like I said, be more specific with your timeline.

You just hurt 14.2’s feelings with that 9-2 stat. 😂 

There’s know doubt Silsbee has had a solid sports program for many years wether it be Football, Basketball or Baseball.

7 minutes ago, Hagar said:

Lmbo, were those games played in the Roman Colosseum?  Okay, prior to the last ice age.  
😂😂😂☠️☠️🤣☠️☠️😂😂😂

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Mr. Buddy Garrity said:

Vidor needs a change, I don't know how though. I don't wish ill-will on em even though some of their fans are kinda weird. Hope they can turn it around. I actually like their HC, sat to him at a Memorial game and talked ball with him, cool dude. 

i agree. vidor needs to not necessarily move away from the slot t but maybe run a more multiple offense to keep the opposing team guessing and not get one dimensional. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,206
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    Ceb2000
    Newest Member
    Ceb2000
    Joined



  • Posts

    • Like I said, even if it’s only 10% of the 100 kids BHISD takes from GCCISD each year, that’s 10 athletes per year and that’s being generous.  You’re right about the jobs with BHISD, BTW.  There’s more than 1 athlete from Baytown originally who got transferred to BHISD after a job opened up for Mama.
    • Here’s a link to another story about it This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up
    • It’s behind a paywall but here’s Baytown Sun’s story on it.  It was reported on in other papers statewide so if you search by the date I think you’ll find other stories on it. UIL strengthens student transfer rules By Ron McDowell [email protected] Oct 18, 2024   In order to maintain a level playing field for all member schools, the University Interscholastic League strengthened rules regarding transfer student eligibility at its most recent meeting in Austin. Every year thousands of students transfer schools in the state of Texas. A student’s ability to participate in UIL sanctioned activities may be limited base on the reasons for the transfer. A change in family status, work transfers, enrollment in an academic magnet program, or a move across town, receive scrutiny, but only rarely does one of these reasons result in the loss of eligibility. The only reason to automatically cause the loss of participation eligibility is a transfer for athletic purposes. The current rule, which has been in place since 1981, does not require a Previous Athletic Participation Form (PAPFs) to be submitted if the student-athlete does not participate in a varsity level sport during the first year of enrollment. There has been growing concern among some member schools, that other members are breaking the current rule and creating “super teams” with new transfer enrollees, and that the UIL is not doing enough to police, what appear to be, the inordinate number of transfers among high school athletes. To mitigate these concerns, the UIL approved a proposal to expand the power of the State Executive Committee (SEC) and allow it to investigate schools based upon the number of PAPFs submitted. Schools that submit an inordinate number of PAPFs would face heightened scrutiny and possible public reprimand and future sanctions. The UIL has also changed the requirements for PAPF submission, mandating that the form be submitted before a grade 9-12 transfer student may participate at any level of school athletics. This is a marked departure from the current policy which encourages schools not to complete PAPFs for students who transfer in, if the school believes that the student will not play a varsity sport in the first year the student is enrolled at the new school. Some critics of the current system think that the change doesn’t go far enough. Speaking on background, one local school district source suggested that there should be an automatic year wait for transfer students due to the number of loopholes in the waiver process. “If a student transfers, it should be a year out of competition automatically,” the source said. In addition, the UIL also approved a proposal that gives the SEC the power to appoint an independent administrator to oversee the conduct of the local District Executive Committee (DEC) if it is determined that the DEC is not consistently enforcing the rules of the governing body. The change is significant since all appeals that a school brings, starts and usually ends with the DEC. That includes the determination of transfer student eligibility. It is believed that with the implementation of this change, schools in a UIL district will be less likely to face retribution from the DEC chair and other members. The policy changes will go into effect, Aug. 1, 2025 This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  
    • I was hoping WOS was going to win. To get another chance to redeem ourself. Silsbee did not look good in that game and has not played consistent during the season. Hopefully against La Vega they will play 4quarters of football
    • This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up   GCCISD paid a firm called PASA to compile this report ahead of them closing/consolidating some schools and redrawing attendance zones.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...