Jump to content

Santa Fe (34) @ Vidor (22) FINAL


jdawg03

Recommended Posts

22 minutes ago, setxathlete14 said:

Vidor is circled for most on the district calendar. They get a co district championship and you'd think they'd won the state championship.

How did you formulate that in your cranium? Lol . I don’t think I’ve seen those type of posters on here. I think most Vidor posters have a realistic view of the team. But hey, that’s a cute post. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, piratevillain said:

i agree. vidor needs to not necessarily move away from the slot t but maybe run a more multiple offense to keep the opposing team guessing and not get one dimensional. 

Been saying it for years. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Unwoke said:

What do we change too? If your change is going to give us much better results then I’ll be more than happy to sign your petition.

2 weeks ago "vidor posters" had a completely different picture and acted like i was crazy when I pointed out back to back winning seasons usually doesn't favor vidors history 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, setxathlete14 said:

2 weeks ago "vidor posters" had a completely different picture and acted like i was crazy when I pointed out back to back winning seasons usually doesn't favor vidors history 

Maybe those Vidor posters like to see the glass half full instead of half empty an give this years team the benefit of the doubt on putting together a winning season.  I mean they are putting in the work to try to accomplish that goal. Its not that hard to pull up Vidors record for the past 20 years or so to see that they haven’t put together 2 district championships back to back but thanks for that incredible insight. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Unwoke said:

Maybe those Vidor posters like to see the glass half full instead of half empty an give this years team the benefit of the doubt on putting together a winning season.  I mean they are putting in the work to try to accomplish that goal. Its not that hard to pull up Vidors record for the past 20 years or so to see that they haven’t put together 2 district championships back to back but thanks for that incredible insight. 

Based on some of these post, appears to be a few Vidor haters in this area.  Rather amazing.  I don’t hate any other school/program.  May envy them somewhat - their winning traditions, but it is what it is.

Last night we saw a spark of encouragement.  Spotted SF 21 points and were within 7 of tying the game prior to another fumble.  Maybe, just maybe, the Pirates will start turning things around.  Nothing like a win or two to change the mindset, and as I posted a day ago, imo the problem they have now is mental, not physical.  Lmbo, as the guy said in Platoon, “Free your mind, your butt will follow”.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, piratevillain said:

that vidor has more success than any other offense. do i need to break it down for you in kindergarten terms? 

By all means do so !

If they ran the offense for many more years then any other offense then it only makes sense that they would have made the playoffs more times using that offense. It's the law of averages.     Sub .500

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you have a team - any team - say North Shore - and they aren’t blocking & tackling, will changing their offense help?  This isn’t a trick question.  The team I saw against Silsbee wasn’t blocking or tackling.  The Spread, Slot T, Wishbone, I formation- doesn’t matter.

Now I’m no Coach or a football guru, so if I’m wrong, please point out where I’ve gone astray.  If NS can win not doing those two things, please explain how.

Once Vidor starts doing those two things & they’re still getting beat, then we can talk about which offense they ought to use.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/3/2022 at 4:08 PM, Hagar said:

Based on some of these post, appears to be a few Vidor haters in this area.  Rather amazing.  I don’t hate any other school/program.  May envy them somewhat - their winning traditions, but it is what it is.

It is amazing what goes on in others minds. Haters are gonna hate. Its just how they roll. Good thing is its in their head. Personally I would rather just enjoy the football season and not waste time obsessing and hating on someone else.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,206
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    Ceb2000
    Newest Member
    Ceb2000
    Joined



  • Posts

    • Here’s a link to another story about it This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up
    • It’s behind a paywall but here’s Baytown Sun’s story on it.  It was reported on in other papers statewide so if you search by the date I think you’ll find other stories on it. UIL strengthens student transfer rules By Ron McDowell [email protected] Oct 18, 2024   In order to maintain a level playing field for all member schools, the University Interscholastic League strengthened rules regarding transfer student eligibility at its most recent meeting in Austin. Every year thousands of students transfer schools in the state of Texas. A student’s ability to participate in UIL sanctioned activities may be limited base on the reasons for the transfer. A change in family status, work transfers, enrollment in an academic magnet program, or a move across town, receive scrutiny, but only rarely does one of these reasons result in the loss of eligibility. The only reason to automatically cause the loss of participation eligibility is a transfer for athletic purposes. The current rule, which has been in place since 1981, does not require a Previous Athletic Participation Form (PAPFs) to be submitted if the student-athlete does not participate in a varsity level sport during the first year of enrollment. There has been growing concern among some member schools, that other members are breaking the current rule and creating “super teams” with new transfer enrollees, and that the UIL is not doing enough to police, what appear to be, the inordinate number of transfers among high school athletes. To mitigate these concerns, the UIL approved a proposal to expand the power of the State Executive Committee (SEC) and allow it to investigate schools based upon the number of PAPFs submitted. Schools that submit an inordinate number of PAPFs would face heightened scrutiny and possible public reprimand and future sanctions. The UIL has also changed the requirements for PAPF submission, mandating that the form be submitted before a grade 9-12 transfer student may participate at any level of school athletics. This is a marked departure from the current policy which encourages schools not to complete PAPFs for students who transfer in, if the school believes that the student will not play a varsity sport in the first year the student is enrolled at the new school. Some critics of the current system think that the change doesn’t go far enough. Speaking on background, one local school district source suggested that there should be an automatic year wait for transfer students due to the number of loopholes in the waiver process. “If a student transfers, it should be a year out of competition automatically,” the source said. In addition, the UIL also approved a proposal that gives the SEC the power to appoint an independent administrator to oversee the conduct of the local District Executive Committee (DEC) if it is determined that the DEC is not consistently enforcing the rules of the governing body. The change is significant since all appeals that a school brings, starts and usually ends with the DEC. That includes the determination of transfer student eligibility. It is believed that with the implementation of this change, schools in a UIL district will be less likely to face retribution from the DEC chair and other members. The policy changes will go into effect, Aug. 1, 2025 This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  
    • I was hoping WOS was going to win. To get another chance to redeem ourself. Silsbee did not look good in that game and has not played consistent during the season. Hopefully against La Vega they will play 4quarters of football
    • This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up   GCCISD paid a firm called PASA to compile this report ahead of them closing/consolidating some schools and redrawing attendance zones.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...