Jump to content

Vidor (12) @ Brazosport (34) FINAL


jdawg03

Recommended Posts

  • WOSdrummer99 changed the title to Vidor (14) @ Brazosport (32) Final/ Game Thread
1 hour ago, Unwoke said:

It’s not just that they’re losing, it’s how they’re losing. Something just isn’t right. Hopefully it gets figured out before district.

Bingo.  Last year when Vidor had fumbleitis, I saw the RB’s running with both hands wrapped around the ball - my conclusion - you fumble you’re on the bench.  This year we must be one of the State leaders in turnovers.

Yes indeed, it’s how we’re losing.  No zip.  No fire.  If there was a logical explanation, okay, I get it.  Problem is, there isn’t one.  All indicators point to a successful season.  Probable DC, and several deep in playoffs.  What’s happening is inexplicable.  Did Credeur bring that much to the table?  Is Coach Matthews even involved?  The leadership folks are complaining about appears to start at the top.  I’m a Matthews fan, but this doesn’t look like a Matthews team.  Hate it for the players.  They deserve better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Hagar said:

Bingo.  Last year when Vidor had fumbleitis, I saw the RB’s running with both hands wrapped around the ball - my conclusion - you fumble you’re on the bench.  This year we must be one of the State leaders in turnovers.

Yes indeed, it’s how we’re losing.  No zip.  No fire.  If there was a logical explanation, okay, I get it.  Problem is, there isn’t one.  All indicators point to a successful season.  Probable DC, and several deep in playoffs.  What’s happening is inexplicable.  Did Credeur bring that much to the table?  Is Coach Matthews even involved?  The leadership folks are complaining about appears to start at the top.  I’m a Matthews fan, but this doesn’t look like a Matthews team.  Hate it for the players.  They deserve better.

Crueders the one who wrecked the offense when he was OC

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Mr. Thornton Melon said:

They haven't had a decent team since 2016. So they won a weak district with a gimmick offense, not impressed

Played a very very young silsbee team got lucky to win, played the worst jasper team I have seen still got lucky to win, lcm missed several big plays that cost them, lumberton completely took there foot off the gas and found a way to lose last yrs great team in reality should have been a 500 team and it shows this yr the program is going in the wrong direction I still stand by Vidor is the only district that will keep a coach 23 yrs with a 500 record and 2 playoff wins in 23 yrs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, astros4141078 said:

Played a very very young silsbee team got lucky to win, played the worst jasper team I have seen still got lucky to win, lcm missed several big plays that cost them, lumberton completely took there foot off the gas and found a way to lose last yrs great team in reality should have been a 500 team and it shows this yr the program is going in the wrong direction I still stand by Vidor is the only district that will keep a coach 23 yrs with a 500 record and 2 playoff wins in 23 yrs

Just curious what was Vidor’s winning percentage before Matthews took over? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, astros4141078 said:

 Guys we got better athletes coming through the program than our record shows, quit settling for just being ok 

I wasn’t trying to make a point. I asked you a sincere question,  an you totally avoided answering it. I am not ok with being mediocre or losing more than we should but all I hear you do is complain and make accusations without solutions, that’s what losers do. Maybe they have kids on the team with your attitude an that’s why they can’t get it together. I say get rid of those kids. I’ll ask again, What was Vidors winning percentage before Matthews took over? This isn’t a trick question, an it also isn’t a question that is praising Matthews record.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Unwoke said:

I wasn’t trying to make a point. I asked you a sincere question,  an you totally avoided answering it. I am not ok with being mediocre or losing more than we should but all I hear you do is complain and make accusations without solutions, that’s what losers do. Maybe they have kids on the team with your attitude an that’s why they can’t get it together. I say get rid of those kids. I’ll ask again, What was Vidors winning percentage before Matthews took over? This isn’t a trick question, an it also isn’t a question that is praising Matthews record.

283-505-18 = .3511  

thats all time. They are ranked the 44th in the state with lowest winning percentage. Ill look up matthews

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Unwoke said:

I wasn’t trying to make a point. I asked you a sincere question,  an you totally avoided answering it. I am not ok with being mediocre or losing more than we should but all I hear you do is complain and make accusations without solutions, that’s what losers do. Maybe they have kids on the team with your attitude an that’s why they can’t get it together. I say get rid of those kids. I’ll ask again, What was Vidors winning percentage before Matthews took over? This isn’t a trick question, an it also isn’t a question that is praising Matthews record.

It doesn't matter what it was before and I have no clue, I have a loser attitude because I want more than being just average I get it makes perfect sense 🤣🤣🤣

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, astros4141078 said:

It doesn't matter what it was before and I have no clue, I have a loser attitude because I want more than being just average I get it makes perfect sense 🤣🤣🤣

Thanks for being truthful, your words not mine, an it shows .  “I have no clue” 😂😂
 

Maybe if you cry a little harder with no solution’s you’ll be more than average. 😂

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,206
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    Ceb2000
    Newest Member
    Ceb2000
    Joined



  • Posts

    • Here’s a link to another story about it This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up
    • It’s behind a paywall but here’s Baytown Sun’s story on it.  It was reported on in other papers statewide so if you search by the date I think you’ll find other stories on it. UIL strengthens student transfer rules By Ron McDowell [email protected] Oct 18, 2024   In order to maintain a level playing field for all member schools, the University Interscholastic League strengthened rules regarding transfer student eligibility at its most recent meeting in Austin. Every year thousands of students transfer schools in the state of Texas. A student’s ability to participate in UIL sanctioned activities may be limited base on the reasons for the transfer. A change in family status, work transfers, enrollment in an academic magnet program, or a move across town, receive scrutiny, but only rarely does one of these reasons result in the loss of eligibility. The only reason to automatically cause the loss of participation eligibility is a transfer for athletic purposes. The current rule, which has been in place since 1981, does not require a Previous Athletic Participation Form (PAPFs) to be submitted if the student-athlete does not participate in a varsity level sport during the first year of enrollment. There has been growing concern among some member schools, that other members are breaking the current rule and creating “super teams” with new transfer enrollees, and that the UIL is not doing enough to police, what appear to be, the inordinate number of transfers among high school athletes. To mitigate these concerns, the UIL approved a proposal to expand the power of the State Executive Committee (SEC) and allow it to investigate schools based upon the number of PAPFs submitted. Schools that submit an inordinate number of PAPFs would face heightened scrutiny and possible public reprimand and future sanctions. The UIL has also changed the requirements for PAPF submission, mandating that the form be submitted before a grade 9-12 transfer student may participate at any level of school athletics. This is a marked departure from the current policy which encourages schools not to complete PAPFs for students who transfer in, if the school believes that the student will not play a varsity sport in the first year the student is enrolled at the new school. Some critics of the current system think that the change doesn’t go far enough. Speaking on background, one local school district source suggested that there should be an automatic year wait for transfer students due to the number of loopholes in the waiver process. “If a student transfers, it should be a year out of competition automatically,” the source said. In addition, the UIL also approved a proposal that gives the SEC the power to appoint an independent administrator to oversee the conduct of the local District Executive Committee (DEC) if it is determined that the DEC is not consistently enforcing the rules of the governing body. The change is significant since all appeals that a school brings, starts and usually ends with the DEC. That includes the determination of transfer student eligibility. It is believed that with the implementation of this change, schools in a UIL district will be less likely to face retribution from the DEC chair and other members. The policy changes will go into effect, Aug. 1, 2025 This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  
    • I was hoping WOS was going to win. To get another chance to redeem ourself. Silsbee did not look good in that game and has not played consistent during the season. Hopefully against La Vega they will play 4quarters of football
    • This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up   GCCISD paid a firm called PASA to compile this report ahead of them closing/consolidating some schools and redrawing attendance zones.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...