Jump to content

DCTF Week 7 State Rankings


AggiesAreWe

Recommended Posts

This is the hidden content, please

Coverage area teams in this week's rankings

6A

#1 North Shore

#7 Atascocita

#25 Summer Creek

 

5A DI

#5 PA Memorial

 

5A DII

#3 FB Marshall

 

4A DI

#7 Lumberton

 

4A DII

#5 Silsbee

 

3A DII

#3 Newton

 

2A DI

#1 Timpson

#10 Centerville

Link to comment
Share on other sites

lol. no love for Jasper after beating the #9 4A DII team.

HF found their way into the spotlight ( and I was one of the first to give them props) after playing a relatively weak schedule to that point.

in all honesty I think we are headed in that direction(top ten) but in reality not one as of now. It just tickles me seeing some of the "ranked" teams this year and the roads that got them there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Dirty_but_Dazzling said:

lol. no love for Jasper after beating the #8 4A DII team.

HF found their way into the spotlight ( and I was one of the first to give them props) after playing a relatively weak schedule to that point.

in all honesty I think we are headed in that direction(top ten) but in reality not one as of now. It just tickles me seeing some of the "ranked" teams this year and the roads that got them there.

What you trying to say about my Brahmas 😂

Link to comment
Share on other sites

L-town still way over ranked.  I said that a few weeks ago, and that dominant 6-point win over a 3A team with a .500 record did not change my opinion.  They have played a weak schedule, with a bad loss to the only team they'll face all year that will end the season with a quality record. Being in a so/so district will work out to their advantage, rankings-wise at least.   Before a certain fan or two come on to defend their honor, I've also previously stated that I think Lumberton has a good team this year, one of the better teams in our coverage area. I just have no idea how DCTF has arrived to the conclusion that they're a top-10 team in 4A-D1.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, bullets13 said:

L-town still way over ranked.  I said that a few weeks ago, and that dominant 6-point win over a 3A team with a .500 record did not change my opinion.  They have played a weak schedule, with a bad loss to the only team they'll face all year that will end the season with a quality record. Being in a so/so district will work out to their advantage, rankings-wise at least.   Before a certain fan or two come on to defend their honor, I've also previously stated that I think Lumberton has a good team this year, one of the better teams in our coverage area. I just have no idea how DCTF has arrived to the conclusion that they're a top-10 team in 4A-D1.  

I agree

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, bullets13 said:

L-town still way over ranked.  I said that a few weeks ago, and that dominant 6-point win over a 3A team with a .500 record did not change my opinion.  They have played a weak schedule, with a bad loss to the only team they'll face all year that will end the season with a quality record. Being in a so/so district will work out to their advantage, rankings-wise at least.   Before a certain fan or two come on to defend their honor, I've also previously stated that I think Lumberton has a good team this year, one of the better teams in our coverage area. I just have no idea how DCTF has arrived to the conclusion that they're a top-10 team in 4A-D1.  

So essentially any ranking Lumberton gets until the playoffs we'll be considered way over ranked I guess....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, bullets13 said:

L-town still way over ranked.  I said that a few weeks ago, and that dominant 6-point win over a 3A team with a .500 record did not change my opinion.  They have played a weak schedule, with a bad loss to the only team they'll face all year that will end the season with a quality record. Being in a so/so district will work out to their advantage, rankings-wise at least.   Before a certain fan or two come on to defend their honor, I've also previously stated that I think Lumberton has a good team this year, one of the better teams in our coverage area. I just have no idea how DCTF has arrived to the conclusion that they're a top-10 team in 4A-D1.  

.400 team. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, raideroldtimer said:

So essentially any ranking Lumberton gets until the playoffs we'll be considered way over ranked I guess....

As the #7 team in the state, Lumberton should blow out every team in their district.  A top 10 team should have no problem beating Vidor and Huffman by 28+ points.  I can assure you the other teams in the top-10 would not struggle to do so.  They should also be able to beat LCM by 2+ scores.  That's just the reality of things.  The other teams in the top-10 in 4A-D1 would beat Tatum by 30 points.  That's also the reality of things.  If Lumberton goes through the district and finishes 9-1 with blowout wins over Vidor and HH, and a convincing win over LCM, I'll agree that they're deserving of their ranking.  In 5 games Lumberton has played 2 teams that are awful, 2 teams that are pretty solid, and 1 team that is actually good.  The one good team they played beat them by three scores, and they beat the two decent teams by one score each.  One of those pretty good teams is 4A-D2, and will finish the year at 6-4, best case.  The other is 3A-D1 and will finish the year 6-4 best case as well.  1-score wins against pretty good teams in lower divisions don't scream out "Top Ten Ranking" to me. So all that said, my point is not that Lumberton is a bad team, it's that they're not deserving of their ranking, and really haven't done anything this year for me to understand how they've gotten it.  In our local 4A-D2 district they'd be in a tight race for 4th place.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Dirty_but_Dazzling said:

I remember Jasper being ranked # 1 and getting beat by Lincoln.

If my memory serves me right, Jasper has been ranked # 1 once or twice or many times.🤔

I'm sure at least once in the 80's. Y'all had some teams back then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,201
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    JBarry68
    Newest Member
    JBarry68
    Joined


  • Posts

    • I don’t benefit from it, that’s not my area.  But the average cost to imprison someone is around $15k per year (on average in the US) and capital cases cost somewhere between $1.5-$3M with over half being overturned or reduced to life in prison anyway.  These numbers may be inflated since the last report I read but I’m sure it would be on both sides and higher on the DP side if anything. So what’s the point?  We feel better because we got to return the favor on someone (hopefully) who committed a heinous crime?  And I don’t know I can say we have “complicated” it. Which appeal should we cut out?  Our justice system has a pecking order and we have higher courts for a reason. When we are about to impose the ultimate judgment, should we cut steps that other cases have to save a buck?  Or do we not pay for an indigent person’s experts at the trial court level because it’s too expensive? Or do we just lock them up and throw away the key (unless we later find out they weren’t actually guilty, in which case we have a key and a life we haven’t unjustly ended) and save a ton of money?  Seems to me to be an easy and obvious solution but I’m more of a pragmatist.
    • 1 thing for certain. Coach Earned 3 more years to figure it out lol
    • @CIS_org National Security Senior Fellow @BensmanTodd tells Steve Bannon how the U.S. State Department and USAID have been sending American taxpayer funds to religious nonprofits to facilitate mass immigration to our southern border. Bensman says 248 nonprofits are participating in the United Nations’ 2024 agenda to distribute $1.6 billion in cash, transportation, food, and shelter to U.S.-bound immigrants across Mexico and Latin America.
    • 👍 Oh. I was thinking most thought Wrong Place Wrong Time. Lol. 
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...