Jump to content

Fetterman Exposed in Debate

Hagar

By Hagar
in Political Forum

 Share

Recommended Posts

Hagar

Hagar

Posted
Posted

Good grief, if there was any doubt in your mind about Fetterman’s ability to function as a US Senator, this debate should remove it all.  I’ll tell you how bad it was, I actually almost felt sorry for him.  Not only can he not function as a Senator, I’m surprised he’s allowed to go to the bathroom by himself.  Seriously, he totally embarrassed himself.  And the whole thing was closed captioned for him.  In this link, a few samples.

This is the hidden content, please

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Reagan

Reagan

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, Hagar said:

Good grief, if there was any doubt in your mind about Fetterman’s ability to function as a US Senator, this debate should remove it all.  I’ll tell you how bad it was, I actually almost felt sorry for him.  Not only can he not function as a Senator, I’m surprised he’s allowed to go to the bathroom by himself.  Seriously, he totally embarrassed himself.  And the whole thing was closed captioned for him.  In this link, a few samples.

This is the hidden content, please

True!  Cringe-worthy performance!

This is the hidden content, please

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Hagar

Hagar

Posted
  • Author
Posted
57 minutes ago, Unwoke said:

How did he even become a candidate? That’s what’s scary!

Can you imagine listening to him and Biden debate each other?😂😂😂

I’ve never, for anything, used “Pay For View” to watch ANY event.  For what you suggested, heck yes, I’d pay to see that.  No doubt in my mind that would exceed Jeff Foxworthy & Bill Engvall.  Bring it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
5GallonBucket

5GallonBucket

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, Hagar said:

I’ve never, for anything, used “Pay For View” to watch ANY event.  For what you suggested, heck yes, I’d pay to see that.  No doubt in my mind that would exceed Jeff Foxworthy & Bill Engvall.  Bring it.

 

1 hour ago, Unwoke said:

How did he even become a candidate? That’s what’s scary!

Can you imagine listening to him and Biden debate each other?😂😂😂

Those two could would actually understand each other while the viewers would be dumbfounded.😂😂😂

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Hagar

Hagar

Posted
  • Author
Posted

For those of you who haven’t looked at the links provided, to give you an idea how bad it was, Fetterman actually, in a loud boisterous voice, interrupted Oz in Oz’s closing argument.  A time respected by all for candidates to make their final appeal to the voters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
baddog

baddog

Posted
Posted
11 hours ago, Hagar said:

Good grief, if there was any doubt in your mind about Fetterman’s ability to function as a US Senator, this debate should remove it all.  I’ll tell you how bad it was, I actually almost felt sorry for him.  Not only can he not function as a Senator, I’m surprised he’s allowed to go to the bathroom by himself.  Seriously, he totally embarrassed himself.  And the whole thing was closed captioned for him.  In this link, a few samples.

This is the hidden content, please

The liberals don’t care how bad they are represented. They will all make excuses for him….. he was nervous, Oz is evil, the questions were difficult, where was his teleprompter….etc…

Personally, I think he needs to take a drug test. I have to in order to work. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
tvc184

tvc184

Posted
Posted

Here is the poop speaking about the reality of politics vs being right.

Everyone can see that Fetterman isn’t capable of effectively carrying out his job as a senator. Everyone can also see the as far as intellectual ability, there is no contest between the two candidates. If anyone was picking a person to run a company that you were starting, you would pick Oz if those were the options. 

However…..

Does any of that matter?

Under our legislative system we have two houses (Senate and House of Representatives) which function independently. Both are required to agree word for word on any new law.

Control of either house is determined by who controls the majority of seats. 

It doesn’t matter who has a more rational argument or who the public supports at any given moment or issue. For example on Obamacare the clear majority of the public did not support it. What matters legally is who controls each house because legislation cannot come up for a vote without the majority party allowing it. The Democrats held power in both houses which allowed a very unpopular law and economically damaging to a majority of people to be passed into law. Control of each house was the important point, not the rationale of the law. Had the Republicans controlled either house, Obamacare would not be the law today.

The public punished the Democrats in the midterms with a crushing defeat. BUT….. the public can’t repeat bad laws, only politicians. The Senate gained 6 Republican seats and the House gained 63 in a huge swing of power. It effectively ended any Democrat control over any new law for the last 6 years of Obama’s presidency. Obamacare made him a lame duck president for the remaining 6 years that he was in office.

Why does that example matter?

Because right now there is a 50/50 split in the Senate with Cackle Harris being the tie breaker for the Democrats. The vice president only gets to vote in a tie. That means if the Republicans gain 1 seat, the Democrats lose the Senate.

Does either party care how they maintain control? The Democrats might have an incapable person intellectually in Fetterman but at this point all they want him to do is vote Yea when they ask. It still could potentially keep the Senate in Democratic control.

Also, if Fetterman wins, he can assume office and resign.  It goes by Pennsylvania state law on how to replace him and that is likely having the governor (currently a Democrat) replace him for the remainder of his term. So Fetterman might assume office for one day and help keep the Senate under Democratic control.

So…..

Fetterman could be the worst candidate ever and 100% of Democratic voters could agree but that has nothing to do with controlling the Senate. They simply want to maintain the seat with anyone with a D beside his  name.

 The Republicans at times (or most of the time) argue that they aren’t voting for that Republican candidate because he is a RINO!!! That is stupid because he still has an R by his name and  by the rules, might keep the Republicans in control of either house.

So why would the hard core Democrats vote for Fetterman even if they agree that he would be a horrible choice?  Because they aren’t voting for Fetterman but the D beside his name.

 The Republicans are hoping that enough independents move to the conservative side of the aisle for this election.

Sling Blade, Fetterman or Mickey Mouse?

Does it really matter???

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Hagar

Hagar

Posted
  • Author
Posted
6 hours ago, tvc184 said:

Here is the poop speaking about the reality of politics vs being right.

Everyone can see that Fetterman isn’t capable of effectively carrying out his job as a senator. Everyone can also see the as far as intellectual ability, there is no contest between the two candidates. If anyone was picking a person to run a company that you were starting, you would pick Oz if those were the options. 

However…..

Does any of that matter?

Under our legislative system we have two houses (Senate and House of Representatives) which function independently. Both are required to agree word for word on any new law.

Control of either house is determined by who controls the majority of seats. 

It doesn’t matter who has a more rational argument or who the public supports at any given moment or issue. For example on Obamacare the clear majority of the public did not support it. What matters legally is who controls each house because legislation cannot come up for a vote without the majority party allowing it. The Democrats held power in both houses which allowed a very unpopular law and economically damaging to a majority of people to be passed into law. Control of each house was the important point, not the rationale of the law. Had the Republicans controlled either house, Obamacare would not be the law today.

The public punished the Democrats in the midterms with a crushing defeat. BUT….. the public can’t repeat bad laws, only politicians. The Senate gained 6 Republican seats and the House gained 63 in a huge swing of power. It effectively ended any Democrat control over any new law for the last 6 years of Obama’s presidency. Obamacare made him a lame duck president for the remaining 6 years that he was in office.

Why does that example matter?

Because right now there is a 50/50 split in the Senate with Cackle Harris being the tie breaker for the Democrats. The vice president only gets to vote in a tie. That means if the Republicans gain 1 seat, the Democrats lose the Senate.

Does either party care how they maintain control? The Democrats might have an incapable person intellectually in Fetterman but at this point all they want him to do is vote Yea when they ask. It still could potentially keep the Senate in Democratic control.

Also, if Fetterman wins, he can assume office and resign.  It goes by Pennsylvania state law on how to replace him and that is likely having the governor (currently a Democrat) replace him for the remainder of his term. So Fetterman might assume office for one day and help keep the Senate under Democratic control.

So…..

Fetterman could be the worst candidate ever and 100% of Democratic voters could agree but that has nothing to do with controlling the Senate. They simply want to maintain the seat with anyone with a D beside his  name.

 The Republicans at times (or most of the time) argue that they aren’t voting for that Republican candidate because he is a RINO!!! That is stupid because he still has an R by his name and  by the rules, might keep the Republicans in control of either house.

So why would the hard core Democrats vote for Fetterman even if they agree that he would be a horrible choice?  Because they aren’t voting for Fetterman but the D beside his name.

 The Republicans are hoping that enough independents move to the conservative side of the aisle for this election.

Sling Blade, Fetterman or Mickey Mouse?

Does it really matter???

Might be post of the year.  Sling Blade, Fetterman or Mickey Mouse?  Does it really matter?  That sums it up.  Essentially George or Marilyn don’t matter either - simply the D or the R.  Sadly, we’re almost to the point there aren’t enough I’s to make a difference.  The D’s have played the long game.  Take over the Colleges/Universities, then we’ll easily take over the schools.  They’ve done that so brainwashing complete.  Now they’re eliminating genders.  I’m not intelligent enough to understand why.  Someone else will have to explain that.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
tvc184

tvc184

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, Hagar said:

Might be post of the year.  Sling Blade, Fetterman or Mickey Mouse?  Does it really matter?  That sums it up.  Essentially George or Marilyn don’t matter either - simply the D or the R.  Sadly, we’re almost to the point there aren’t enough I’s to make a difference.  The D’s have played the long game.  Take over the Colleges/Universities, then we’ll easily take over the schools.  They’ve done that so brainwashing complete.  Now they’re eliminating genders.  I’m not intelligent enough to understand why.  Someone else will have to explain that.

 

Why?

Control of a socialist agenda which translates to power for the chosen elite.

The millionaires and billionaires at the top of the food chain will always be their no matter who is in control. The only real issue is how much freedom will there be for the 98% who aren’t in the elite class.

Will your life be better if the government takes away every penny from Bill Gates and Elon Musk? The federal government in the first year of Biden spent $7 Trillion.  The US government printed non-existent money and spent $20 Billion….. per day. The predictable result is high inflation.

If they got all of Gates’ and Musk’s money and made the paupers, it would fund the federal government for about two weeks. 

With the current high inflation everyone except the elites are feeling the huge crunch and it will get worse.

The Democrats have the ability to convince a core group of people that if Musk loses every penny, your life will better. Gasoline at $5 a gallon won’t hurt you, the police are the cause of crime, tearing down statues is a huge relief in your finances and if men can use the women’s bathrooms and showers by claiming that their body parts aren’t really what you see…. you will be in Utopia. 

And as miserable as your life becomes, the people at the top of the food chain will still be there. The only difference is how miserable your life will become but at least the 98% of the people will be equal in their misery.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Big girl

Big girl

Posted
Posted
On 10/31/2022 at 9:55 PM, 5GallonBucket said:

Are you that stupid????

go listen to a Biden speech….not the highlight version from the commie channels.

did you watch the fetterman/oz debate?..

Oh wait it takes cognitive recognition to realize their cognitive decline…..

 

Do you think that Walker is intelligent? Is he good at debating? I think you all know that he isn't, but y’all won't admit it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Reagan

Reagan

Posted
Posted
34 minutes ago, Big girl said:

Do you think that Walker is intelligent? Is he good at debating? I think you all know that he isn't, but y’all won't admit it.

I don't think anyone can reasonably doubt that Walker won the debate against Warnock!  The part I watched, Warnock was not up to the task!  Walker is a good Christian man.  That ought to mean something to you!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
tvc184

tvc184

Posted
Posted
8 hours ago, Big girl said:

Do you think that Walker is intelligent? Is he good at debating? I think you all know that he isn't, but y’all won't admit it.

I care how he votes and not how he speaks.

Hitler was a great orator and inspired much of his country to engage in almost unspeakable acts. He is right up there with the most despicable people in history… but he sure could fire up a crowd.

Sorry but I don’t vote on debating skills. I am not sure what there is to admit.

If a Democrat said, I am against all gun control, I am against abortions, I am for opening up American fossil fuels production, I think spending should either be cut or at least severely curtailed…. I might be voting for him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Reagan

Reagan

Posted
Posted
23 hours ago, Big girl said:

Do you think that Walker is intelligent? Is he good at debating? I think you all know that he isn't, but y’all won't admit it.

BigGirl, here is Walker's opponent:  Inside Raphael Warnock’s Secret Low-Income Apartment Building:  Brutal Murders, Rotting Corpses, Broken Elevators!

This is the hidden content, please

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Big girl

Big girl

Posted
Posted
23 hours ago, Reagan said:

I don't think anyone can reasonably doubt that Walker won the debate against Warnock!  The part I watched, Warnock was not up to the task!  Walker is a good Christian man.  That ought to mean something to you!

Ha ha ha. He can barely put together a sentence, and he is extremely ignorant. He did not win the debate. He is making a fool out of himself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Member Statistics

    46,192
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    Mateo
    Newest Member
    Mateo
    Joined


×
×
  • Create New...