Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 hours ago, Unwoke said:

Florida could have counted their votes plus every vote in Nevada and Arizona by now. What a joke.

Has Florida counted all of their votes or has data scientistists figured out that he won?

Posted
41 minutes ago, Unwoke said:

Who is data scientist?

Search for a wordsearch_grey600_24dp.png
 
 
 
 
da·ta sci·en·tist
 
noun
  1. a person employed to analyze and interpret complex digital data, such as the usage statistics of a website, especially in order to assist a business in its decision-making.
    "Silicon Valley technology companies are hiring data scientists to help them glean insights from the terabytes of data that they collect everyday
Posted
4 minutes ago, Big girl said:
Search for a word
This is the hidden content, please
 
 
 
 
da·ta sci·en·tist
 
noun
  1. a person employed to analyze and interpret complex digital data, such as the usage statistics of a website, especially in order to assist a business in its decision-making.
    "Silicon Valley technology companies are hiring data scientists to help them glean insights from the terabytes of data that they collect everyday

I was being facetious. Smh

Posted

Remember: it’s totally normal and not at all suspicious that everything is faster and more efficient in modern times yet somehow our voting results take longer to tabulate than they did in 1802.

Posted
21 minutes ago, Unwoke said:

Remember: it’s totally normal and not at all suspicious that everything is faster and more efficient in modern times yet somehow our voting results take longer to tabulate than they did in 1802.

Easier to count 110,000 votes I’ll say.

Posted
10 hours ago, Unwoke said:

All this Trump v. DeSantis talk is juicy, but under the hood, there's a far more pressing issue: Democrats fortified their COVID mass mail-in-voting apparatus. It's a vote-harvesting juggernaut that will continue to produce competitive results no matter the GOP nominee.

I will not pretend to understand how all this works, but can't the GOP use the same mail-in-voting apparatus?  What do those numbers look like?

Posted
6 hours ago, PhatMack19 said:

Murkowski will end up winning.  The ranked choice voting system they use in Alaska is a terrible way to vote.   

Ranked choice makes a lot of sense. It is a toss up which system is better but ranked choice has its merits. 

Posted
7 hours ago, parrothead said:

I will not pretend to understand how all this works, but can't the GOP use the same mail-in-voting apparatus?  What do those numbers look like?

Vote harvesting is criminal.

Is your suggestion that Republicans resort to crimes to counteract the other side? 

Posted
7 hours ago, PAMFAM10 said:

Easier to count 110,000 votes I’ll say.

It’s Easier to count 500 votes. When you divide each county into small precincts with fully vetted representatives from both parties, then forward results to a main precinct it doesn’t take that long to get results. 

Posted
7 hours ago, PhatMack19 said:

Murkowski will end up winning.  The ranked choice voting system they use in Alaska is a terrible way to vote.   

It was done that way intentionally imo.

Posted
22 hours ago, LumRaiderFan said:

Isn’t it sad that we’re in a time where being deceptive about your policies and dirty tricks are considered great political tactics.

If republicans used the same strategies successfully the majority of the posters in this thread would be high fiving and celebrating.  That's not an opinion, it's a fact.  And speaking of facts, it's hard to be mad about democrats finding success by endorsing republicans who echo Trump's election claims. I don't really think it should be considered a dirty trick at all.  If Trump didn't have so much support from the right for his claims and behavior, there wouldn't be a scourge of candidates acting the same way (losing elections).  

Posted
12 hours ago, Unwoke said:

Remember: it’s totally normal and not at all suspicious that everything is faster and more efficient in modern times yet somehow our voting results take longer to tabulate than they did in 1802.

It took weeks to tabulate votes back then.

Posted
45 minutes ago, Big girl said:

It took weeks to tabulate votes back then.

Ya think. Count to a million and get back with me. One million seconds equals 11 days, 13 hours, 46 minutes, and 40 seconds. They didn’t have computers back then. 

Posted
1 hour ago, bullets13 said:

If republicans used the same strategies successfully the majority of the posters in this thread would be high fiving and celebrating.  That's not an opinion, it's a fact.  And speaking of facts, it's hard to be mad about democrats finding success by endorsing republicans who echo Trump's election claims. I don't really think it should be considered a dirty trick at all.  If Trump didn't have so much support from the right for his claims and behavior, there wouldn't be a scourge of candidates acting the same way (losing elections).  

Just because you say it doesn’t make it fact, it is, in fact, false.

The reason Republicans haven’t done this to date is because they aren’t as a whole, scumbags like the democrats are.

THAT is a fact, and the evidence proves it…sorry.

Posted
1 hour ago, LumRaiderFan said:

Just because you say it doesn’t make it fact, it is, in fact, false.

The reason Republicans haven’t done this to date is because they aren’t as a whole, scumbags like the democrats are.

THAT is a fact, and the evidence proves it…sorry.

yeah, republicans never, ever, ever do anything underhanded or crooked to win elections.  come on, man.  you're smarter than this.  that said, you can't honestly believe that if republicans could find away to endorse democratic candidates with low chances of winning that they wouldn't do it "out of fairness."  they'd jump all over it, and republicans everywhere would support it.  Just because you pretend it's not that way doesn't make it fact.  I've seen an overwhelming majority of politicians on both sides do anything they can get away with to win, and an overwhelming majority of their supporters let underhanded behavior slide on their side, while setting the other side on fire for doing the same things.

Posted
26 minutes ago, bullets13 said:

yeah, republicans never, ever, ever do anything underhanded or crooked to win elections.  come on, man.  you're smarter than this.  that said, you can't honestly believe that if republicans could find away to endorse democratic candidates with low chances of winning that they wouldn't do it "out of fairness."  they'd jump all over it, and republicans everywhere would support it.  Just because you pretend it's not that way doesn't make it fact.  I've seen an overwhelming majority of politicians on both sides do anything they can get away with to win, and an overwhelming majority of their supports let underhanded behavior slide on thier side, while setting the other side on fire for doing the same things.

Never said Republicans did anything underhanded, but they actually run on their record.  democrats cannot.

You can pretend all you want that Republicans are as deceitful and dishonest as democrats but it just isn't so.  That's completely ignorant of facts.  

The people that were fooled by the latest shenanigans pulled by the democrats voted against candidates simply because they were linked to Trump, no looking into records, past voting, none of that, SIMPLY Trump.

These folks and the democrats that pulled this crap are the folks you are defending, all while blaming all bad things that happened this last cycle on Trump.

This, to me, is the epitome of voters that vote on nothing based on records or facts, only their hurt feelings, aka snowflakes.

Trump will hopefully be gone soon and that problem will still remain, but keep on blaming him for all problems, the democrats love it.

Posted

Kelly Tshibaka “Anticipating a Whole Bunch of Shenanigans” from RINO Lisa Murkowski!

From the article;  "This is how they steal it: Trump-endorsed MAGA candidate Kelly Tshibaka won the most votes in the Alaska Senate race. However, thanks to a crooked system called “ranked-choice voting” introduced by corrupt Never-Trumper Lisa Murkowski and exposed by Project Veritas, Tshibaka still has to fight for the Senate seat she won."

This is the hidden content, please

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,283
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    Malachi
    Newest Member
    Malachi
    Joined
×
×
  • Create New...