Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
4 hours ago, bullets13 said:

Trump is starting to lose it.  The stuff he says just gets crazier and crazier.  I really am starting to think that his end goal is to be a dictator.  He's that arrogant and self-absorbed.  

He's that arrogant and self-absorbed for sure, but it surprises me you would go to Dictator. I personally feel he is upset he lost, knows there was some voter fraud, and just hates to lose. 

I must say the only decision he did during his Presidency that I disagreed with was the bump stock ban. I now why he did it, but didn't agree with it......and it was overturned I believe.   

Posted
27 minutes ago, thetragichippy said:

He's that arrogant and self-absorbed for sure, but it surprises me you would go to Dictator. I personally feel he is upset he lost, knows there was some voter fraud, and just hates to lose. 

I must say the only decision he did during his Presidency that I disagreed with was the bump stock ban. I now why he did it, but didn't agree with it......and it was overturned I believe.   


In before the trumpers turn on bullets13, as they did cardinalbacker 

Posted
2 hours ago, thetragichippy said:

He's that arrogant and self-absorbed for sure, but it surprises me you would go to Dictator. I personally feel he is upset he lost, knows there was some voter fraud, and just hates to lose. 

I must say the only decision he did during his Presidency that I disagreed with was the bump stock ban. I now why he did it, but didn't agree with it......and it was overturned I believe.   

That's the only bad decision? Smh

Posted
6 hours ago, TxFan said:

Whether anyone likes it or not, if 45 wins the nomination and D's chose anyone besides Hillary and Biden they win! 

Probably so.  It’s a shame that ppl don’t care what direction the country is headed.  

Posted
14 hours ago, thetragichippy said:

He's that arrogant and self-absorbed for sure, but it surprises me you would go to Dictator. I personally feel he is upset he lost, knows there was some voter fraud, and just hates to lose. 

I must say the only decision he did during his Presidency that I disagreed with was the bump stock ban. I now why he did it, but didn't agree with it......and it was overturned I believe.   

When you start trying to overturn not only your elections, but to alter elections of your handpicked candidates around the country, while trying to ruin anyone who dares speak out against you… the question is how far he’ll go to gain control.  I know that threshold hasn’t been reached yet.  

Posted

Trump knows exactly how the dims are stacking the deck against the American people with their liberal/woke/communist ideology. I applaud anyone who fights that tooth and nail. People have died fighting communism for all of us and we reward that (in their memory) by electing them into our government……. Shameful!

Posted
4 hours ago, bullets13 said:

When you start trying to overturn not only your elections, but to alter elections of your handpicked candidates around the country, while trying to ruin anyone who dares speak out against you… the question is how far he’ll go to gain control.  I know that threshold hasn’t been reached yet.  

Are you saying the democrats don't try and actually ruin anyone that opposes them?  Remember Kavanaugh, Thomas, I could go on and on.  I'm not talking about simply calling them bad names and making mean tweets (which I won't defend) but I'm talking about LITERALLY trying to destroy lives with KNOWINGLY false information.

Also, don't forget the Russia Collusion crap was also KNOWINGLY made up lies that Hillary Clinton herself was very aware of, actually hired folks to create it.

Your dislike of Trump is skewing you ability to see this is nothing new.

Posted
1 hour ago, LumRaiderFan said:

Are you saying the democrats don't try and actually ruin anyone that opposes them?  Remember Kavanaugh, Thomas, I could go on and on.  I'm not talking about simply calling them bad names and making mean tweets (which I won't defend) but I'm talking about LITERALLY trying to destroy lives with KNOWINGLY false information.

Also, don't forget the Russia Collusion crap was also KNOWINGLY made up lies that Hillary Clinton herself was very aware of, actually hired folks to create it.

Your dislike of Trump is skewing you ability to see this is nothing new.

Trump encouraged people to overthrow the government 

Posted
2 hours ago, baddog said:

Trump knows exactly how the dims are stacking the deck against the American people with their liberal/woke/communist ideology. I applaud anyone who fights that tooth and nail. People have died fighting communism for all of us and we reward that (in their memory) by electing them into our government……. Shameful!

Do you know what the word communism means? Apparently not. Smh

Posted
On 1/19/2023 at 4:58 PM, Unwoke said:

Now there’s a real statesman. George Bush! Good Grief! 
 

He’s nothing more than a warmongering embarrassment.

His whole family was an embarrassment imo.

Did you vote for him?

Posted
8 minutes ago, Big girl said:

Do you know what the word communism means? Apparently not. Smh

Do you? Your idol and leader of BLM is a Marxist. Why wouldn’t I know what communism is? Have you ever fought against it? That’s what I thought. Easily led to slaughter. 

Posted

So what would voting look like if we removed names and parties from people? They spoke on their beliefs and their agenda's but we couldn't see their faces. Their history of what they have and haven't supported was shown next to their candidacy (we know a great majority of people aren't going to try and research this). I bet we would find different people in offices all over the country. Too many people vote on parties, or for a name, or against a name, etc. A lot of people vote for a certain party because that's what their parents voted for. I would be willing to be it people really took a neutral approach from the beginning...we would see different results in a lot of elections.

Posted
6 minutes ago, JSnipes said:

So what would voting look like if we removed names and parties from people? They spoke on their beliefs and their agenda's but we couldn't see their faces. Their history of what they have and haven't supported was shown next to their candidacy (we know a great majority of people aren't going to try and research this). I bet we would find different people in offices all over the country. Too many people vote on parties, or for a name, or against a name, etc. A lot of people vote for a certain party because that's what their parents voted for. I would be willing to be it people really took a neutral approach from the beginning...we would see different results in a lot of elections.

So can you give me one policy that the Democrats stand for that a conservative would embrace, just one?

Posted
Just now, LumRaiderFan said:

So can you give me one policy that the Democrats stand for that a conservative would embrace, just one?

Nope, and probably can't give you one the other way around. The point is if it was possible to do it this way we wouldn't see what we see. What percentage of people do you think actually invest time into deciding who they vote for? I'm going to guess...not a high percentage. I was the first person in my family to ever vote Republican because I started paying attention to what the candidates were talking about and what they stood for. This was way back in 2000. I know my grandparents and parents would not have agreed for the other party had they listened. They voted that way because they always had.

How much of every campaign is attacking the other person? That's a waste of time as well. 

 

I also don't think politicians in the parties agree with all the policies in their party. They are just a member of that party because they agree with the majority of the policies. 

Posted
1 minute ago, JSnipes said:

Nope, and probably can't give you one the other way around. The point is if it was possible to do it this way we wouldn't see what we see. What percentage of people do you think actually invest time into deciding who they vote for? I'm going to guess...not a high percentage. I was the first person in my family to ever vote Republican because I started paying attention to what the candidates were talking about and what they stood for. This was way back in 2000. I know my grandparents and parents would not have agreed for the other party had they listened. They voted that way because they always had.

How much of every campaign is attacking the other person? That's a waste of time as well. 

 

I also don't think politicians in the parties agree with all the policies in their party. They are just a member of that party because they agree with the majority of the policies. 

Agree 100% with both statements in bold, especially the first one.  There were a lot of folks that had no idea the train wreck that was coming when Biden was elected, but there were a lot of us that were not surprised how things turned out, we had already seen the template under Obama.

As to the second, you can say that about most constituents as well, no party is perfect, you have to go with what aligns as best with your ideology, or choose to have no voice at all.

The shame of it is, the Republican platform is very close to my ideology, but the implementation of it by Washington Republicans is not.

Good post.

Posted
2 hours ago, LumRaiderFan said:

Are you saying the democrats don't try and actually ruin anyone that opposes them?  Remember Kavanaugh, Thomas, I could go on and on.  I'm not talking about simply calling them bad names and making mean tweets (which I won't defend) but I'm talking about LITERALLY trying to destroy lives with KNOWINGLY false information.

Also, don't forget the Russia Collusion crap was also KNOWINGLY made up lies that Hillary Clinton herself was very aware of, actually hired folks to create it.

Your dislike of Trump is skewing you ability to see this is nothing new.


oh look, the billionth “whataboutism” reply on this forum 

and the person you’re replying to isn’t even a democrat! LOL

 

Posted
13 minutes ago, LumRaiderFan said:

The shame of it is, the Republican platform is very close to my ideology, but the implementation of it by Washington Republicans is not.

Good post.

Good point. Unfortunately the two parties have also grown so far apart in the past 10-20 years there is nothing but hate for one another. A house divided cannot stand…if they can’t fix themselves in Washington we will collapse.

Posted
2 minutes ago, JSnipes said:

Good point. Unfortunately the two parties have also grown so far apart in the past 10-20 years there is nothing but hate for one another. A house divided cannot stand…if they can’t fix themselves in Washington we will collapse.

"We the People" may have to fix it ourselves one day.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,282
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    Unknown472929300
    Newest Member
    Unknown472929300
    Joined
×
×
  • Create New...