Jump to content

I'M IN DISBELIEF


Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, LOBOFAN84 said:

This is the hidden content, please

Well, I found some problems with our archived file compared to this link. If this is official. Then we are lower than I previously stated.

All it would take is an 0-10 season, and Southlake Carroll 10-0. And that title is gone. Now I don't think this will happen. But it's closer than I thought.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

WO-S as a legendary program is done. Apparently it is going to take some folks multiple faceplants to realize it, but that winning percentage is going to plummet faster than you might expect. No one is saying that WO-S won't compete. Occasionally they will field a talented squad that will partially overcome coaching shortcomings, but our reign as a program that is routinely a cut above with kids dreaming of a silver hat from peewee on is over. Don't know what you got til its gone. We predicted this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Judex said:

WO-S as a legendary program is done. Apparently it is going to take some folks multiple faceplants to realize it, but that winning percentage is going to plummet faster than you might expect. No one is saying that WO-S won't compete. Occasionally they will field a talented squad that will partially overcome coaching shortcomings, but our reign as a program that is routinely a cut above with kids dreaming of a silver hat from peewee on is over. Don't know what you got til its gone. We predicted this.

Indeed we did.... 30 years ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Gasilla said:

Indeed we did.... 30 years ago.

In 92? After getting put out early 3 years by CE King. And then the forfeits. I can't belive this was even part of the discussion. It's not like Hooks had one foot out the door and rolled up in the golf cart. CT would've kept going til he couldn't anymore too. But the only thing guaranteed, is change. And I'm all for it when it's actually needed. The wheels were nowhere near falling off. They loosened the lugs and who knows how long til someone finds a 4way.

Is there still a tire shop west orange? If not the only one is Wal Mart. Smh. I wouldn't trust them to check the pressure. One time they forgot my oil plug. 🤬 always check for yourself. Glad I did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, WOSdrummer99 said:

In 92? After getting put out early 3 years by CE King. And then the forfeits. I can't belive this was even part of the discussion. It's not like Hooks had one foot out the door and rolled up in the golf cart. CT would've kept going til he couldn't anymore too. But the only thing guaranteed, is change. And I'm all for it when it's actually needed. The wheels were nowhere near falling off. They loosened the lugs and who knows how long til someone finds a 4way.

Is there still a tire shop west orange? If not the only one is Wal Mart. Smh. I wouldn't trust them to check the pressure. One time they forgot my oil plug. 🤬 always check for yourself. Glad I did.

I don’t think that is what he was saying.  And I will further read his mind and say it wasn’t exactly 30 years....just a rough number.  There were folks back then that didn’t like how Hooks and CT ran things.  Definitely not folks from surrounding communities who had a ton of theories and people could say whatever and you didn’t have Google handy to put them in check.  Anyway, I digress....what was generally stated was this:  “When Hooks and CT do ride off into the sunset, the program will likely go into decline”.  Everyone that followed closely knew that WOS had talent but it was the coaching and program installed gave WOS something extra.

There had been rumors of Hooks retiring a little before the ‘92 season....so yeah, those conversations happened.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, #1stangfan said:

I don’t think that is what he was saying.  And I will further read his mind and say it wasn’t exactly 30 years....just a rough number.  There were folks back then that didn’t like how Hooks and CT ran things.  Definitely not folks from surrounding communities who had a ton of theories and people could say whatever and you didn’t have Google handy to put them in check.  Anyway, I digress....what was generally stated was this:  “When Hooks and CT do ride off into the sunset, the program will likely go into decline”.  Everyone that followed closely knew that WOS had talent but it was the coaching and program installed gave WOS something extra.

There had been rumors of Hooks retiring a little before the ‘92 season....so yeah, those conversations happened.

I know it wasn't meant to be an exact number. My reply was just putting the context of that era. There's always been people that didn't like it. They talked about play calling being bland when we were up by 40. Said CT couldn't win a championship without a better OC when Toby left. They were dancing in the stands when we beat Sinton in the semis, and cussed him during the Gilmer game. Then the same thing until PG.

Of course we knew that when CT retired it would decline. But not like this. We all assumed that the tradition would continue if a former player/coach took the lead. That didn't happen. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Right but to his point, these conversations happened back then whether you felt they might leave or not.  Just WHEN it happened, unless WOS got lucky, decline was inevitable.

like you said, I don’t think anyone saw this level of dysfunction.  I expected a step back and gradual decline if someone didn’t step up....but not a full backwards sprint.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, #1stangfan said:

And not just retirement.  This was a staff that had been on a nice run since ‘85 and had opportunities outside of Orange Texas.

And like most of us that are still here. Even when they left they got pulled back in. O the magic of the fruit city. So now with so many alumni scattered all across Texas, the ones that left felt the need to decide for us... KT. And the ones that stayed are paying for it, literally with our tax dollars bro. The slow shift will soon be a rush. I can see a mass exodus if this isn't curtailed. Major improvement over the next year is the only way to save face at this point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, #1stangfan said:

like you said, I don’t think anyone saw this level of dysfunction.  I expected a step back and gradual decline if someone didn’t step up....but not a full backwards sprint.

🎯 Exactly. We got a small taste in week 1 of 2021. And that should have been a wake up call to the staff, super, and admin. We could've accepted losing district to Silsbee, or Jasper, or HF. But not all 3. Especially if one had a clear idea of what had been working since he made his way from Hardin county. There are people in this world that are a quick study. In 6 years, what was learned? 

I'm beginning to wonder if this was all part of the plan set into place long ago. Give the people what they think they want. Knowing it's a futile experiment with no traction. Then when the people are ready to revolt, make the change to meet their new demands. And take all the credit for revitalization of a program that should have never been in decline. 

Politics as usual. Create a problem and make the constituents think they've elected someone who has the answers.

#makeWOSgreatagain

I really need to think of a better campaign slogan. I got it...

"Change We Can Believe In" 😉 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, WOSdrummer99 said:

🎯 Exactly. We got a small taste in week 1 of 2021. And that should have been a wake up call to the staff, super, and admin. We could've accepted losing district to Silsbee, or Jasper, or HF. But not all 3. Especially if one had a clear idea of what had been working since he made his way from Hardin county. There are people in this world that are a quick study. In 6 years, what was learned? 

I'm beginning to wonder if this was all part of the plan set into place long ago. Give the people what they think they want. Knowing it's a futile experiment with no traction. Then when the people are ready to revolt, make the change to meet their new demands. And take all the credit for revitalization of a program that should have never been in decline. 

Politics as usual. Create a problem and make the constituents think they've elected someone who has the answers.

#makeWOSgreatagain

I really need to think of a better campaign slogan. I got it...

"Change We Can Believe In" 😉 

How about “If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it!”  Too late for that one though. Bottom line is that not everyone is built to be a HC. If you can’t convey to your players what you want them to do, then let someone who can, take the lead. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, RanchHand said:

How about “If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it!”  Too late for that one though. Bottom line is that not everyone is built to be a HC. If you can’t convey to your players what you want them to do, then let someone who can, take the lead. 

It happens in normal workplaces everyday. Boss retires, next person up, department/store goes down. Then they give the boss a raise and say, well we paying him too much to knock him back down a notch. So how about come over here to an easier job and we'll find another replacement for that other position.

In my experience, just cut loose all the dead weight and stop making us carry the load for those who can't. Our current staff alumni could be in a similar scenario fighting an uphill battle. If they leave, they can't help right the ship. And if they stay, they're told to stay below deck.

Just another opinion of a lifelong Mustang. Loyalty and respect to the ones that bled blue and silver over the last 45 years. It ain't over...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/28/2022 at 8:42 PM, WOSdrummer99 said:

In 92? After getting put out early 3 years by CE King. And then the forfeits. I can't belive this was even part of the discussion. It's not like Hooks had one foot out the door and rolled up in the golf cart. CT would've kept going til he couldn't anymore too. But the only thing guaranteed, is change. And I'm all for it when it's actually needed. The wheels were nowhere near falling off. They loosened the lugs and who knows how long til someone finds a 4way.

Is there still a tire shop west orange? If not the only one is Wal Mart. Smh. I wouldn't trust them to check the pressure. One time they forgot my oil plug. 🤬 always check for yourself. Glad I did.

What you "believe" really doesn't matter. This was talked about long ago... If the right predecessor was not selected, it would all come tumbling down and we were right on the mark.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,206
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    Ceb2000
    Newest Member
    Ceb2000
    Joined



  • Posts

    • Here’s a link to another story about it This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up
    • It’s behind a paywall but here’s Baytown Sun’s story on it.  It was reported on in other papers statewide so if you search by the date I think you’ll find other stories on it. UIL strengthens student transfer rules By Ron McDowell [email protected] Oct 18, 2024   In order to maintain a level playing field for all member schools, the University Interscholastic League strengthened rules regarding transfer student eligibility at its most recent meeting in Austin. Every year thousands of students transfer schools in the state of Texas. A student’s ability to participate in UIL sanctioned activities may be limited base on the reasons for the transfer. A change in family status, work transfers, enrollment in an academic magnet program, or a move across town, receive scrutiny, but only rarely does one of these reasons result in the loss of eligibility. The only reason to automatically cause the loss of participation eligibility is a transfer for athletic purposes. The current rule, which has been in place since 1981, does not require a Previous Athletic Participation Form (PAPFs) to be submitted if the student-athlete does not participate in a varsity level sport during the first year of enrollment. There has been growing concern among some member schools, that other members are breaking the current rule and creating “super teams” with new transfer enrollees, and that the UIL is not doing enough to police, what appear to be, the inordinate number of transfers among high school athletes. To mitigate these concerns, the UIL approved a proposal to expand the power of the State Executive Committee (SEC) and allow it to investigate schools based upon the number of PAPFs submitted. Schools that submit an inordinate number of PAPFs would face heightened scrutiny and possible public reprimand and future sanctions. The UIL has also changed the requirements for PAPF submission, mandating that the form be submitted before a grade 9-12 transfer student may participate at any level of school athletics. This is a marked departure from the current policy which encourages schools not to complete PAPFs for students who transfer in, if the school believes that the student will not play a varsity sport in the first year the student is enrolled at the new school. Some critics of the current system think that the change doesn’t go far enough. Speaking on background, one local school district source suggested that there should be an automatic year wait for transfer students due to the number of loopholes in the waiver process. “If a student transfers, it should be a year out of competition automatically,” the source said. In addition, the UIL also approved a proposal that gives the SEC the power to appoint an independent administrator to oversee the conduct of the local District Executive Committee (DEC) if it is determined that the DEC is not consistently enforcing the rules of the governing body. The change is significant since all appeals that a school brings, starts and usually ends with the DEC. That includes the determination of transfer student eligibility. It is believed that with the implementation of this change, schools in a UIL district will be less likely to face retribution from the DEC chair and other members. The policy changes will go into effect, Aug. 1, 2025 This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  
    • I was hoping WOS was going to win. To get another chance to redeem ourself. Silsbee did not look good in that game and has not played consistent during the season. Hopefully against La Vega they will play 4quarters of football
    • This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up   GCCISD paid a firm called PASA to compile this report ahead of them closing/consolidating some schools and redrawing attendance zones.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...