Jump to content

Lumberton (23) vs Tyler Chapel Hill (35) - FINAL

jdawg03

By jdawg03
in High School Football

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 177
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

wo-s#1
wo-s#1

CH fans must have forgot how to login to SETX Sports.com…stay on the gas Raiders 

SmashMouth
SmashMouth

I don’t think lack of hunger or off-season expectations were the issue with LCM. Sometimes, you either have the tools or you don’t. Same goes for Lumberton moving forward. Although, I hope they can ke

wo-s#1
wo-s#1

28-23 CH…here they come they all found their passwords 

Posted Images

wbfan

wbfan

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, wbfan said:

I'm curious about a Lumberton vs Kilgore match up. On paper Kilgore looks to be too fast and too athletic for Lumberton. Then again, Lumberton wasn't expected to get this far in the first place 

 

Wow. Looks like Lumberton wasn't ready for prime time after all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
vhs

vhs

Posted
Posted
15 minutes ago, Tigers94 said:

Question is can Lumberton keep this up or are they gonna be a one or two hit wonder?

Success can do a lot for a program, so long as there's some talent in the area.

 

Previous posts this season suggested they’ll be solid again next year … and then it appears a significant drop off is coming… but we will see.  That community is growing FAST

Link to comment
Share on other sites
raideroldtimer

raideroldtimer

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, Dat Brook said:

Apparently my $10 a month doesn't pay for decent streaming quality at the New Caney stadium. Anyone know what just transpired? Seems like the Lumberton sideline is upset.

I'll tell you what a girl at a pager company told one of my drivers back in the early 90's when he wasn't receiving pages at his house. She said "But sir there are too many trees in the way for your pager to receive the signal."🤣

As far as what was happening when you froze it was possibly the kick off we recovered when they claimed that we didn't allow the receiver a chance to receive it. They called it kick off interference. Problem is that kid was just standing there like he didn't know what to do and finally our guys jumped on it which woke him up. It should have been our ball because it went well over 10 yards. That was probably the first thing that took the wind out of our sails and then when Ricky broke for 92 yards that pretty much did our guys in. We had it in the bag before then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
raideroldtimer

raideroldtimer

Posted
Posted

Lumberton Raiders, hold your heads high, you did us proud and we know next year you're going to get past that hump. The biggest difference between now and 2007 is back then they really didn't know what to expect and walked in with their chests pumped up then Waller waylayed us. This one you just got a few bad breaks that cost you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TopDog96

TopDog96

Posted
Posted
26 minutes ago, raideroldtimer said:

I'll tell you what a girl at a pager company told one of my drivers back in the early 90's when he wasn't receiving pages at his house. She said "But sir there are too many trees in the way for your pager to receive the signal."🤣

As far as what was happening when you froze it was possibly the kick off we recovered when they claimed that we didn't allow the receiver a chance to receive it. They called it kick off interference. Problem is that kid was just standing there like he didn't know what to do and finally our guys jumped on it which woke him up. It should have been our ball because it went well over 10 yards. That was probably the first thing that took the wind out of our sails and then when Ricky broke for 92 yards that pretty much did our guys in. We had it in the bag before then.

Still lose by 5. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Member Statistics

    46,201
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    JBarry68
    Newest Member
    JBarry68
    Joined


  • Posts

    • TxHoops
      Susan Smith

      By TxHoops · Posted

      I don’t benefit from it, that’s not my area.  But the average cost to imprison someone is around $15k per year (on average in the US) and capital cases cost somewhere between $1.5-$3M with over half being overturned or reduced to life in prison anyway.  These numbers may be inflated since the last report I read but I’m sure it would be on both sides and higher on the DP side if anything. So what’s the point?  We feel better because we got to return the favor on someone (hopefully) who committed a heinous crime?  And I don’t know I can say we have “complicated” it. Which appeal should we cut out?  Our justice system has a pecking order and we have higher courts for a reason. When we are about to impose the ultimate judgment, should we cut steps that other cases have to save a buck?  Or do we not pay for an indigent person’s experts at the trial court level because it’s too expensive? Or do we just lock them up and throw away the key (unless we later find out they weren’t actually guilty, in which case we have a key and a life we haven’t unjustly ended) and save a ton of money?  Seems to me to be an easy and obvious solution but I’m more of a pragmatist.
    • setxathlete14
      2024 WOS Mustangs

      By setxathlete14 · Posted

      1 thing for certain. Coach Earned 3 more years to figure it out lol
    • Reagan
      Trump Wins

      By Reagan · Posted

      AMEN!
    • Reagan
      JoeBama Administration Gives NGOs Millions To Facilitate Immigration Invasion!

      By Reagan · Posted

      @CIS_org National Security Senior Fellow @BensmanTodd tells Steve Bannon how the U.S. State Department and USAID have been sending American taxpayer funds to religious nonprofits to facilitate mass immigration to our southern border. Bensman says 248 nonprofits are participating in the United Nations’ 2024 agenda to distribute $1.6 billion in cash, transportation, food, and shelter to U.S.-bound immigrants across Mexico and Latin America.
    • SmashMouth
      2024 WOS Mustangs

      By SmashMouth · Posted

      👍 Oh. I was thinking most thought Wrong Place Wrong Time. Lol. 

  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...