Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

After having an argument about past teams....how does Calpreps have WOS chances with that 2016 defensive team vs 2022 state finalist teams?

Just for entertainment...some of these predicted outcomes are interesting

[2016] West Orange-Stark (Orange, TX) 28 (73%), [2022] Argyle (TX) 19 (27%)

[2016] West Orange-Stark (Orange, TX) 26 (61%), [2022] Port Neches-Groves (Port Neches, TX) 21 (39%)

ne2016 West Orange-Stark (Orange, TX) 21 (53%), [2022] South Oak Cliff (Dallas, TX) 20 (47%)

[2022] Carthage (TX) 31 (74%), [2016] West Orange-Stark (Orange, TX) 21 (26%)

[2022] DeSoto (TX) 42 (90%), [2016] West Orange-Stark (Orange, TX) 21 (10%)

[2022] North Shore (Houston, TX) 42 (95%), [2016] West Orange-Stark (Orange, TX) 17 (5%)

[2022] Duncanville (TX) 38 (96%), [2016] West Orange-Stark (Orange, TX) 10 (4%)

[2022] Westlake (Austin, TX) 38 (87%), [2016] West Orange-Stark (Orange, TX) 20 (13%)

[2022] Aledo (TX) 31 (74%), [2016] West Orange-Stark (Orange, TX) 21 (26%)

[2016] West Orange-Stark (Orange, TX) 28 (57%), [2022] College Station (TX) 26 (43%)

[2022] Vandegrift (Austin, TX) 28 (73%), [2016] West Orange-Stark (Orange, TX) 19 (27%)

[2022] China Spring (TX) 28 (57%), [2016] West Orange-Stark (Orange, TX) 26 (43%)

[2016] West Orange-Stark (Orange, TX) 28 (57%), [2022] Boerne (TX) 26 (43%)

[2016] West Orange-Stark (Orange, TX) 22 (53%), [2022] Gunter (TX) 21 (47%)

[2016] West Orange-Stark (Orange, TX) 38 (90%), [2022] Poth (TX) 17 (10%)

[2016] West Orange-Stark (Orange, TX) 28 (65%), [2022] Brock (TX) 21 (35%)

[2016] West Orange-Stark (Orange, TX) 28 (57%), [2022] Franklin (TX) 26 (43%)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Posted
1 minute ago, LCMAlumtiger32 said:

Someone please find WOS a new head coach. These people need to win asap

Where's Todd Dodge when you need him.............. I'm sure he can find them one. But they gotta be able to eat more than turkey burgers. 

Posted
Just now, Mr. Buddy Garrity said:

Where's Todd Dodge when you need him.............. I'm sure he can find them one. But they gotta be able to eat more than turkey burgers. 

If they would have left CT alone they would have had a winning year imo. I hear CT is gonna be making come back😉

Posted
2 hours ago, LCMAlumtiger32 said:

If they would have left CT alone they would have had a winning year imo. I hear CT is gonna be making come back😉

CT wanted one more year with that team.Was very optimistic about a possible state appearance with all the returning players.Sorry but can't mention the source I heard it from. 

Posted
33 minutes ago, GUNHO said:

CT wanted one more year with that team.Was very optimistic about a possible state appearance with all the returning players.Sorry but can't mention the source I heard it from. 

I have guess who you heard from. But ill support where-ever he goes. I know some of his kids. I hear wants to get back on the field!

Posted

Geez...it was just for fun...everyone calm down! This thread has NOTHING to do with PNG. I hope they win state...would be good for the area! I live in San Antonio so NO ONE here is talking about WOS or even know they exist...so pump the brakes on that. And if you actually went down the list...there were quite a few losses predicted.

Posted

You asked...here's 2017 Newton vs 2022 teams

[2022] Aledo (TX) 41 (88%), [2017] Newton (TX) 21 (12%)
[2022] College Station (TX) 35 (73%), [2017] Newton (TX) 26 (27%)

[2022] North Shore (Houston, TX) 49 (98%), [2017] Newton (TX) 14 (2%)

[2022] Duncanville (TX) 48 (>99%), [2017] Newton (TX) 7 (<1%)

[2022] Port Neches-Groves (Port Neches, TX) 31 (61%), [2017] Newton (TX) 26 (39%)

[2022] South Oak Cliff (Dallas, TX) 28 (65%), [2017] Newton (TX) 21 (35%)

[2022] Franklin (TX) 35 (65%), [2017] Newton (TX) 28 (35%)

[2022] Boerne (TX) 35 (72%), [2017] Newton (TX) 27 (28%)

[2022] Westlake (Austin, TX) 48 (97%), [2017] Newton (TX) 19 (3%)

[2022] DeSoto (TX) 50 (97%), [2017] Newton (TX) 19 (3%)
[2022] China Spring (TX) 35 (75%), [2017] Newton (TX) 24 (25%)

[2017] Newton (TX) 35 (72%), [2022] Poth (TX) 27 (28%)

[2022] Brock (TX) 31 (60%), [2017] Newton (TX) 27 (40%)

[2022] Gunter (TX) 31 (74%), [2017] Newton (TX) 21 (26%)

 

 


 

Posted
2 minutes ago, 3rdone said:

You asked...here's 2017 Newton vs 2022 teams

[2022] Aledo (TX) 41 (88%), [2017] Newton (TX) 21 (12%)
[2022] College Station (TX) 35 (73%), [2017] Newton (TX) 26 (27%)

[2022] North Shore (Houston, TX) 49 (98%), [2017] Newton (TX) 14 (2%)

[2022] Duncanville (TX) 48 (>99%), [2017] Newton (TX) 7 (<1%)

[2022] Port Neches-Groves (Port Neches, TX) 31 (61%), [2017] Newton (TX) 26 (39%)

[2022] South Oak Cliff (Dallas, TX) 28 (65%), [2017] Newton (TX) 21 (35%)

[2022] Franklin (TX) 35 (65%), [2017] Newton (TX) 28 (35%)

[2022] Boerne (TX) 35 (72%), [2017] Newton (TX) 27 (28%)

[2022] Westlake (Austin, TX) 48 (97%), [2017] Newton (TX) 19 (3%)

[2022] DeSoto (TX) 50 (97%), [2017] Newton (TX) 19 (3%)
[2022] China Spring (TX) 35 (75%), [2017] Newton (TX) 24 (25%)

[2017] Newton (TX) 35 (72%), [2022] Poth (TX) 27 (28%)

[2022] Brock (TX) 31 (60%), [2017] Newton (TX) 27 (40%)

[2022] Gunter (TX) 31 (74%), [2017] Newton (TX) 21 (26%)

 

 


 

Newton isnt  scoring that high on most of those teams lol

Posted
17 hours ago, LCMAlumtiger32 said:

I have guess who you heard from. But ill support where-ever he goes. I know some of his kids. I hear wants to get back on the field!

This is quite interesting. 

Posted

This year should have some people really doing some thinking… those guys who believed WOS “bloodlines” are the reason for so much success and the guys who thought that PNG couldn’t compete demographically were both proven wrong. 
 

i think that these two programs will be pointed out in the future during those conversations about the importance of coaching in high school football. It’s a big component… a huge one. Definitely not an afterthought. 

Posted
43 minutes ago, CardinalBacker said:

This year should have some people really doing some thinking… those guys who believed WOS “bloodlines” are the reason for so much success and the guys who thought that PNG couldn’t compete demographically were both proven wrong. 
 

i think that these two programs will be pointed out in the future during those conversations about the importance of coaching in high school football. It’s a big component… a huge one. Definitely not an afterthought. 

Agreed. It's a mix of everything though. Coaches, players and the peripheral components (community that backs the school district spending money on the program, for one).

Posted

I go back and look and the loss to PN-G and it does not look so bad now.     
I was standing on the sidelines on Newton’s 4 th down and 5 yds and when they took the measurement Newton got the 1 st down by 1 inch. One inch shorter and WOS wins that game.    
WO-S is still WO-S.  They are not done yet. The negative needs to stop and give this new system a chance.   I can remember a time ago when some of the fans were after CT .

 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,283
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    Malachi
    Newest Member
    Malachi
    Joined


×
×
  • Create New...