Jump to content

How good was that 2016 WOS team??

3rdone

By 3rdone
in High School Football

 Share

Recommended Posts

3rdone

3rdone

Posted
Posted

After having an argument about past teams....how does Calpreps have WOS chances with that 2016 defensive team vs 2022 state finalist teams?

Just for entertainment...some of these predicted outcomes are interesting

[2016] West Orange-Stark (Orange, TX) 28 (73%), [2022] Argyle (TX) 19 (27%)

[2016] West Orange-Stark (Orange, TX) 26 (61%), [2022] Port Neches-Groves (Port Neches, TX) 21 (39%)

ne2016 West Orange-Stark (Orange, TX) 21 (53%), [2022] South Oak Cliff (Dallas, TX) 20 (47%)

[2022] Carthage (TX) 31 (74%), [2016] West Orange-Stark (Orange, TX) 21 (26%)

[2022] DeSoto (TX) 42 (90%), [2016] West Orange-Stark (Orange, TX) 21 (10%)

[2022] North Shore (Houston, TX) 42 (95%), [2016] West Orange-Stark (Orange, TX) 17 (5%)

[2022] Duncanville (TX) 38 (96%), [2016] West Orange-Stark (Orange, TX) 10 (4%)

[2022] Westlake (Austin, TX) 38 (87%), [2016] West Orange-Stark (Orange, TX) 20 (13%)

[2022] Aledo (TX) 31 (74%), [2016] West Orange-Stark (Orange, TX) 21 (26%)

[2016] West Orange-Stark (Orange, TX) 28 (57%), [2022] College Station (TX) 26 (43%)

[2022] Vandegrift (Austin, TX) 28 (73%), [2016] West Orange-Stark (Orange, TX) 19 (27%)

[2022] China Spring (TX) 28 (57%), [2016] West Orange-Stark (Orange, TX) 26 (43%)

[2016] West Orange-Stark (Orange, TX) 28 (57%), [2022] Boerne (TX) 26 (43%)

[2016] West Orange-Stark (Orange, TX) 22 (53%), [2022] Gunter (TX) 21 (47%)

[2016] West Orange-Stark (Orange, TX) 38 (90%), [2022] Poth (TX) 17 (10%)

[2016] West Orange-Stark (Orange, TX) 28 (65%), [2022] Brock (TX) 21 (35%)

[2016] West Orange-Stark (Orange, TX) 28 (57%), [2022] Franklin (TX) 26 (43%)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
GUNHO

GUNHO

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, LCMAlumtiger32 said:

If they would have left CT alone they would have had a winning year imo. I hear CT is gonna be making come back😉

CT wanted one more year with that team.Was very optimistic about a possible state appearance with all the returning players.Sorry but can't mention the source I heard it from. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Tiger33

Tiger33

Posted
Posted
33 minutes ago, GUNHO said:

CT wanted one more year with that team.Was very optimistic about a possible state appearance with all the returning players.Sorry but can't mention the source I heard it from. 

I have guess who you heard from. But ill support where-ever he goes. I know some of his kids. I hear wants to get back on the field!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
3rdone

3rdone

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Geez...it was just for fun...everyone calm down! This thread has NOTHING to do with PNG. I hope they win state...would be good for the area! I live in San Antonio so NO ONE here is talking about WOS or even know they exist...so pump the brakes on that. And if you actually went down the list...there were quite a few losses predicted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
3rdone

3rdone

Posted
  • Author
Posted

You asked...here's 2017 Newton vs 2022 teams

[2022] Aledo (TX) 41 (88%), [2017] Newton (TX) 21 (12%)
[2022] College Station (TX) 35 (73%), [2017] Newton (TX) 26 (27%)

[2022] North Shore (Houston, TX) 49 (98%), [2017] Newton (TX) 14 (2%)

[2022] Duncanville (TX) 48 (>99%), [2017] Newton (TX) 7 (<1%)

[2022] Port Neches-Groves (Port Neches, TX) 31 (61%), [2017] Newton (TX) 26 (39%)

[2022] South Oak Cliff (Dallas, TX) 28 (65%), [2017] Newton (TX) 21 (35%)

[2022] Franklin (TX) 35 (65%), [2017] Newton (TX) 28 (35%)

[2022] Boerne (TX) 35 (72%), [2017] Newton (TX) 27 (28%)

[2022] Westlake (Austin, TX) 48 (97%), [2017] Newton (TX) 19 (3%)

[2022] DeSoto (TX) 50 (97%), [2017] Newton (TX) 19 (3%)
[2022] China Spring (TX) 35 (75%), [2017] Newton (TX) 24 (25%)

[2017] Newton (TX) 35 (72%), [2022] Poth (TX) 27 (28%)

[2022] Brock (TX) 31 (60%), [2017] Newton (TX) 27 (40%)

[2022] Gunter (TX) 31 (74%), [2017] Newton (TX) 21 (26%)

 

 


 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Tiger33

Tiger33

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, 3rdone said:

You asked...here's 2017 Newton vs 2022 teams

[2022] Aledo (TX) 41 (88%), [2017] Newton (TX) 21 (12%)
[2022] College Station (TX) 35 (73%), [2017] Newton (TX) 26 (27%)

[2022] North Shore (Houston, TX) 49 (98%), [2017] Newton (TX) 14 (2%)

[2022] Duncanville (TX) 48 (>99%), [2017] Newton (TX) 7 (<1%)

[2022] Port Neches-Groves (Port Neches, TX) 31 (61%), [2017] Newton (TX) 26 (39%)

[2022] South Oak Cliff (Dallas, TX) 28 (65%), [2017] Newton (TX) 21 (35%)

[2022] Franklin (TX) 35 (65%), [2017] Newton (TX) 28 (35%)

[2022] Boerne (TX) 35 (72%), [2017] Newton (TX) 27 (28%)

[2022] Westlake (Austin, TX) 48 (97%), [2017] Newton (TX) 19 (3%)

[2022] DeSoto (TX) 50 (97%), [2017] Newton (TX) 19 (3%)
[2022] China Spring (TX) 35 (75%), [2017] Newton (TX) 24 (25%)

[2017] Newton (TX) 35 (72%), [2022] Poth (TX) 27 (28%)

[2022] Brock (TX) 31 (60%), [2017] Newton (TX) 27 (40%)

[2022] Gunter (TX) 31 (74%), [2017] Newton (TX) 21 (26%)

 

 


 

Newton isnt  scoring that high on most of those teams lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CardinalBacker

CardinalBacker

Posted
Posted

This year should have some people really doing some thinking… those guys who believed WOS “bloodlines” are the reason for so much success and the guys who thought that PNG couldn’t compete demographically were both proven wrong. 
 

i think that these two programs will be pointed out in the future during those conversations about the importance of coaching in high school football. It’s a big component… a huge one. Definitely not an afterthought. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SmashMouth

SmashMouth

Posted
Posted
43 minutes ago, CardinalBacker said:

This year should have some people really doing some thinking… those guys who believed WOS “bloodlines” are the reason for so much success and the guys who thought that PNG couldn’t compete demographically were both proven wrong. 
 

i think that these two programs will be pointed out in the future during those conversations about the importance of coaching in high school football. It’s a big component… a huge one. Definitely not an afterthought. 

Agreed. It's a mix of everything though. Coaches, players and the peripheral components (community that backs the school district spending money on the program, for one).

Link to comment
Share on other sites
purpleeagle

purpleeagle

Posted
Posted

I go back and look and the loss to PN-G and it does not look so bad now.     
I was standing on the sidelines on Newton’s 4 th down and 5 yds and when they took the measurement Newton got the 1 st down by 1 inch. One inch shorter and WOS wins that game.    
WO-S is still WO-S.  They are not done yet. The negative needs to stop and give this new system a chance.   I can remember a time ago when some of the fans were after CT .

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Member Statistics

    46,203
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    bfr_341-
    Newest Member
    bfr_341-
    Joined


×
×
  • Create New...