Bobcat1 Posted December 19, 2022 Report Posted December 19, 2022 This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Quote
Reagan Posted December 19, 2022 Report Posted December 19, 2022 2 hours ago, Bobcat1 said: This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up LOL! They must REALLY be afraid of this man. But this means nothing because there's nothing there. I believe it was a lawyer who said that "you can indict a ham sandwich!" So -- more TDS on parade! SMH! PS -- They have been after Trump for, what, 6 years now and they have NOTHING. All they could do is make up stuff that has proven to be 100% false! If they actually had something, like the J 6 committee, they would have already put it out there for charges. But, again -- NOTHING! LumRaiderFan and Unwoke 2 Quote
BS Wildcats Posted December 20, 2022 Report Posted December 20, 2022 Did anyone expect anything else? The Dems were after him before he was ever inaugurated. Quote
UT alum Posted December 20, 2022 Report Posted December 20, 2022 3 hours ago, Reagan said: LOL! They must REALLY be afraid of this man. But this means nothing because there's nothing there. I believe it was a lawyer who said that "you can indict a ham sandwich!" So -- more TDS on parade! SMH! PS -- They have been after Trump for, what, 6 years now and they have NOTHING. All they could do is make up stuff that has proven to be 100% false! If they actually had something, like the J 6 committee, they would have already put it out there for charges. But, again -- NOTHING! He who laughs last…. And, I will be laughing last. Quote
BS Wildcats Posted December 20, 2022 Report Posted December 20, 2022 1 minute ago, UT alum said: He who laughs last…. And, I will be laughing last. He will not serve day of prison. Keep laughing!! Quote
tvc184 Posted December 20, 2022 Report Posted December 20, 2022 1. Congress has no authority to bring charges on anyone. In that scope they are nothing more than private citizens. As an example, if someone in this forum believes they’re aware of or can show a civil rights violation, they can contact the FBI and pass on the information. In that respect, Congress can pass on the information, but that is it. 2. The United States Attorney (USA) for that district in Washington has to accept charges and seek a federal indictment. The same USA on his own discretion could have investigated Trump at any time in the last two years with actual law-enforcement authority, and not under a recommendation from Congress. 3. This was just a committee and not the entire House of Representatives. It was basically a Star Chamber were a defense was not allowed and the Republicans weren’t allowed to participate or call witnesses. It was an example of a kangaroo court. 4. The entire House voted during Obama‘s term to seek criminal contempt charges against Attorney General Eric Holder for contempt of Congress. The USA did not seek an indictment. Another Democrat committee in 2019 voted to ask the USA to indict then Trump Attorney General William Barr for criminal contempt. Nothing was done. 5. The Democrats have had two years of “investigations” and their term and committees (and any proposed laws) ends in a few days. Once a Congress ends its term and a new Congress is seated in odd years on January 3, all previous bills end and any investigations start anew but in this case, under Republican control. That means anything not passed or finished in the next few days, ends. This was their parting shot. This was the Democrat’s participation trophy to themselves. It was now or never so their last official act was to say, we would sure like to see Trump indicted. NO KIDDING?? 6. The USA could, at his discretion, seek an indictment on recommendations from Congress but it is not an automatic as I showed above. 7. I would normally say that this is a non-issue and will go nowhere. Under the current, hyper partisan dog and pony show that we are watching right now, I would not disregard that It might happen, however. Bobcat1 1 Quote
Unwoke Posted December 20, 2022 Report Posted December 20, 2022 4 hours ago, Reagan said: LOL! They must REALLY be afraid of this man. But this means nothing because there's nothing there. I believe it was a lawyer who said that "you can indict a ham sandwich!" So -- more TDS on parade! SMH! PS -- They have been after Trump for, what, 6 years now and they have NOTHING. All they could do is make up stuff that has proven to be 100% false! If they actually had something, like the J 6 committee, they would have already put it out there for charges. But, again -- NOTHING! Funny thing about it is everytime they make up something about Trump we find more Democrat Corruption. 😂 Ty Cobb 1 Quote
BS Wildcats Posted December 20, 2022 Report Posted December 20, 2022 6 minutes ago, Unwoke said: Funny thing about it is everytime they make up something about Trump we find more Democrat Corruption. 😂 Schiff head needs to dig into the biden’s! Yea right🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣This committee proves Dems are a joke and have nothing better to do. If they would have put as much effort into choosing a better candidate than biden, as they did trying get Trump out of office, maybe we wouldn’t be in the shape we are now. They wasted 6 years doing nothing but trying to overthrow Trump. I would say that was a coup attempt. Is that the same thing as what the Dems call an insurrection? Quote
LumRaiderFan Posted December 20, 2022 Report Posted December 20, 2022 1 hour ago, BS Wildcats said: Schiff head needs to dig into the biden’s! Yea right🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣This committee proves Dems are a joke and have nothing better to do. If they would have put as much effort into choosing a better candidate than biden, as they did trying get Trump out of office, maybe we wouldn’t be in the shape we are now. They wasted 6 years doing nothing but trying to overthrow Trump. I would say that was a coup attempt. Is that the same thing as what the Dems call an insurrection? A proper insurrection requires at least two flagpoles and a fire extinguisher. Quote
UT alum Posted December 20, 2022 Report Posted December 20, 2022 4 hours ago, BS Wildcats said: He will not serve day of prison. Keep laughing!! Doesn’t mean he won’t be convicted. Quote
Reagan Posted December 20, 2022 Report Posted December 20, 2022 5 hours ago, UT alum said: He who laughs last…. And, I will be laughing last. Only if you are not on the side of actual rule of law! Quote
UT alum Posted December 20, 2022 Report Posted December 20, 2022 4 hours ago, tvc184 said: 1. Congress has no authority to bring charges on anyone. In that scope they are nothing more than private citizens. As an example, if someone in this forum believes they’re aware of or can show a civil rights violation, they can contact the FBI and pass on the information. In that respect, Congress can pass on the information, but that is it. 2. The United States Attorney (USA) for that district in Washington has to accept charges and seek a federal indictment. The same USA on his own discretion could have investigated Trump at any time in the last two years with actual law-enforcement authority, and not under a recommendation from Congress. 3. This was just a committee and not the entire House of Representatives. It was basically a Star Chamber were a defense was not allowed and the Republicans weren’t allowed to participate or call witnesses. It was an example of a kangaroo court. 4. The entire House voted during Obama‘s term to seek criminal contempt charges against Attorney General Eric Holder for contempt of Congress. The USA did not seek an indictment. Another Democrat committee in 2019 voted to ask the USA to indict then Trump Attorney General William Barr for criminal contempt. Nothing was done. 5. The Democrats have had two years of “investigations” and their term and committees (and any proposed laws) ends in a few days. Once a Congress ends its term and a new Congress is seated in odd years on January 3, all previous bills end and any investigations start anew but in this case, under Republican control. That means anything not passed or finished in the next few days, ends. This was their parting shot. This was the Democrat’s participation trophy to themselves. It was now or never so their last official act was to say, we would sure like to see Trump indicted. NO KIDDING?? 6. The USA could, at his discretion, seek an indictment on recommendations from Congress but it is not an automatic as I showed above. 7. I would normally say that this is a non-issue and will go nowhere. Under the current, hyper partisan dog and pony show that we are watching right now, I would not disregard that It might happen, however. It is under grand jury investigation, and the current DOJ has two years minimum to complete its investigation, indict and prosecute. Even Trump got the reds at McCarthy for not replacing Jordan and the other traitor I can’t remember his name. He could have had 4 republicans on there and chose not to. Picked up his ball and went home when he didn’t get his way. I venture to guess, and would be willing to wager there will be indictments, and ordinary citizens like you and me will sit on a jury, hear the evidence, and convict the ex president of at least one charge. Big girl 1 Quote
Reagan Posted December 20, 2022 Report Posted December 20, 2022 Alan Dershowitz dismisses Jan. 6 committee’s Trump referral: ‘Worthless piece of paper’! And he's a Democrat! Not many logical ones left! This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Quote
tvc184 Posted December 20, 2022 Report Posted December 20, 2022 12 minutes ago, Reagan said: Alan Dershowitz dismisses Jan. 6 committee’s Trump referral: ‘Worthless piece of paper’! And he's a Democrat! Not many logical ones left! This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Hahaha…. He must have read my comments of it being a kangaroo court. if he mentions participation trophy, I want credit or I will accuse him of plagiarism. 😃 Quote
UT alum Posted December 20, 2022 Report Posted December 20, 2022 13 minutes ago, tvc184 said: Hahaha…. He must have read my comments of it being a kangaroo court. if he mentions participation trophy, I want credit or I will accuse him of plagiarism. 😃 You don’t know a shill when you see one? Quote
UT alum Posted December 20, 2022 Report Posted December 20, 2022 29 minutes ago, Reagan said: Alan Dershowitz dismisses Jan. 6 committee’s Trump referral: ‘Worthless piece of paper’! And he's a Democrat! Not many logical ones left! This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up You don’t know a shill when you see one? Obfuscation reigns in the conservative bubble. Your guys make three card monty look like a game of checkers. Quote
BS Wildcats Posted December 20, 2022 Report Posted December 20, 2022 3 hours ago, UT alum said: Doesn’t mean he won’t be convicted. A token conviction, just like the sham impeachments. Quote
Unwoke Posted December 20, 2022 Report Posted December 20, 2022 The DOJ is gonna indict Trump and they’re gonna arrest him and they’re gonna do it ON CAMERA and if any of that shocks you, you haven’t been paying attention to what’s happening in this country. Quote
Unwoke Posted December 20, 2022 Report Posted December 20, 2022 4 hours ago, UT alum said: You don’t know a shill when you see one? Obfuscation reigns in the conservative bubble. Your guys make three card monty look like a game of checkers. Says the Government Seal with his little Ball. Quote
Eagle11 Posted December 20, 2022 Report Posted December 20, 2022 A committee made of of Trump haters pushed this forward. Liz Cheney cannot go away and hide in her daddies basement fast enough. If this Congress were serious about going after criminals, that presidents crackhead son would be in prison already and he would not be far behind. Unwoke 1 Quote
BS Wildcats Posted December 20, 2022 Report Posted December 20, 2022 24 minutes ago, Eagle11 said: A committee made of of Trump haters pushed this forward. Liz Cheney cannot go away and hide in her daddies basement fast enough. If this Congress were serious about going after criminals, that presidents crackhead son would be in prison already and he would not be far behind. He and the big guy get a pass from the DOJ, FBI, CIA and any other government entity. Can you imagine if this were one of Trump’s sons? Of course , there would be no cover up any governmental law enforcement agency, as they have done with the biden’s. You won’t hear a word out of UTalum or Big girl about the biden’s corruption. Their TDS has them blinded as to what is actually going on in the government. And this started during obama’s reign. Quote
LumRaiderFan Posted December 20, 2022 Report Posted December 20, 2022 7 hours ago, UT alum said: Doesn’t mean he won’t be convicted. Just give them 6 MORE years, they'll come up with something. Quote
baddog Posted December 20, 2022 Report Posted December 20, 2022 Dems are a waste of time and money. Stupidest bunch of yo-yos on earth. BS Wildcats 1 Quote
Reagan Posted December 20, 2022 Report Posted December 20, 2022 15 hours ago, UT alum said: You don’t know a shill when you see one? Obfuscation reigns in the conservative bubble. Your guys make three card monty look like a game of checkers. I'm sure Alan Dershowitz has been called many things but I'm reasonably sure a "Republican Shill" is not one of them! Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.