Jump to content

George Santos - NY Representative


Bobcat1

Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...

 if he was a democrat this thread would be 6 pages long by now.  Literally one conservative on the site halfway condemns him? I haven't really spent any time in the political thread in a couple of weeks, but I thought surely there would be a lively thread on George Santos.  Boy was I wrong.  What an embarrassment this guy is, and this is way beyond the typical lies a politician tells to get elected.   He has no business serving a single day as a representative.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, bullets13 said:

 if he was a democrat this thread would be 6 pages long by now.  Literally one conservative on the site halfway condemns him? I haven't really spent any time in the political thread in a couple of weeks, but I thought surely there would be a lively thread on George Santos.  Boy was I wrong.  What an embarrassment this guy is, and this is way beyond the typical lies a politician tells to get elected.   He has no business serving a single day as a representative.  

What do you expect coming from NY voters? As far as a thread being 6 pages long, imagine if it were Trump Jr with a laptop full of dirt on himself and President Trump.  The Dems would have a thread a 100 pages long.  So, it goes both ways.  Santos needs to go, but needs to replaced by an R, for sure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, baddog said:

Santos needs to talk with Liz Warren and Joe Biden on how to pull off big lies. They are all POS. How’s that? I’ve always aligned with Republucans because they reflect my conservative views. I, nor any other conservative on this board,  have ever claimed there are no scoundrels amongst us.

 Instead of you condemning this, you turn it on the other side saying "well, if they did it, then it's ok". 

It's ridiclous how both sides on this board use the same excuse. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Bobcat1 said:

 Instead of you condemning this, you turn it on the other side saying "well, if they did it, then it's ok". 

It's ridiclous how both sides on this board use the same excuse. 

You read stuff in there that just isn’t there. I condemned them all. Stop reaching. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Bobcat1 said:

 Instead of you condemning this, you turn it on the other side saying "well, if they did it, then it's ok". 

It's ridiclous how both sides on this board use the same excuse. 

It’s the textbook trumptard response

 

”but HWAT about Obama/Hillary’s emails/hunters laptop/Biden” etc 

 

it’s a cult 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, DonTheCon2024 said:

It’s the textbook trumptard response

 

”but HWAT about Obama/Hillary’s emails/hunters laptop/Biden” etc 

 

it’s a cult 

Typical comeback from someone who doesn’t care about right and wrong, just cares about getting Trump. What a mindset. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, baddog said:

Of course this keeps you in the clear….. coward. 

Well DUH! Why on earth would I blindly pledge alliance to a political party like you guys do? Makes zero sense.
 

But I guess that’s why y’all keep falling for the nonsense (don’t worry 2024 is the year, and I mean it this time!)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, baddog said:

So align with no party…. You have no right to complain either way. Just sit there on your high horse and watch the communists take over. Of course that won’t affect someone like you. 

1 minute you’re telling us about the uniparty..

 

Next minute you’re telling us we have to pick a side.. 

 

Come on mannnnnn 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, DonTheCon2024 said:

1 minute you’re telling us about the uniparty..

 

Next minute you’re telling us we have to pick a side.. 

 

Come on mannnnnn 

I’ve never said anything about uniparty. You’re also a liar, but I guess that goes hand in hand. 
But that was a good retort. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Bobcat1 changed the title to George Santos - NY Representative

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,201
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    JBarry68
    Newest Member
    JBarry68
    Joined



  • Posts

    • naw, maaaaybe 7, definitely not 8 deep.  today im avoiding sitting by #10s parents, had to move away yesterday.   "put my son back in jub, put my son back in"  and then crying on every little touch of someone.    lets ball out today ktz!    
    • Very close game until the 2nd half (mostly the 4th) when Orangefield came unraveled. Worse defensive effort I have seen out of the Bobcats in three years. This team has to get back on D and quit getting beat over the top when pressing. Offensively, non ball handlers continually turn it over and their shot selection is poor. Basic basketball, such as: defensive hustle, boxing out, and taking care of the basketball are the areas the Bobcats need to work on most. Whitmire will get them on point, but he shouldn't have to coach effort at the Varsity Level.  We'll be at McNeese this Friday night at 6pm.
    • I don’t benefit from it, that’s not my area.  But the average cost to imprison someone is around $15k per year (on average in the US) and capital cases cost somewhere between $1.5-$3M with over half being overturned or reduced to life in prison anyway.  These numbers may be inflated since the last report I read but I’m sure it would be on both sides and higher on the DP side if anything. So what’s the point?  We feel better because we got to return the favor on someone (hopefully) who committed a heinous crime?  And I don’t know I can say we have “complicated” it. Which appeal should we cut out?  Our justice system has a pecking order and we have higher courts for a reason. When we are about to impose the ultimate judgment, should we cut steps that other cases have to save a buck?  Or do we not pay for an indigent person’s experts at the trial court level because it’s too expensive? Or do we just lock them up and throw away the key (unless we later find out they weren’t actually guilty, in which case we have a key and a life we haven’t unjustly ended) and save a ton of money?  Seems to me to be an obvious solution but I’m more of a pragmatist.
    • 1 thing for certain. Coach Earned 3 more years to figure it out lol
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...