purpleeagle Posted February 5, 2023 Report Posted February 5, 2023 18 hours ago, Mr. Thornton Melon said: Normally you wouldn't but this is Vidor we're talking about here They could not afford Dodge. Tiger33 1 Quote
AggiesAreWe Posted February 5, 2023 Report Posted February 5, 2023 7 hours ago, WOSdrummer99 said: DWAYNE DUBOIS 9 years 45-51-0 ---staff, Vidor-- 2013 Hardin-Jefferson 8-5-0 T 2014 Hardin-Jefferson 11-2-0 R 2015 Bridge City 7-4-0 T 2016 Bridge City 9-3-0 2017 Bridge City 1-7-0 2018 Hardin-Jefferson 2-8-0 2019 Hardin-Jefferson 1-9-0 F 2020 Hardin-Jefferson 5-5-0 T 2021 Hardin-Jefferson 1-8-0 ALVIN CREDEUR 7 years 34-39-0 2013 Lumberton 4-6-0 2014 Lumberton 11-2-0 C 2015 Lumberton 8-2-0 C 2016 Lumberton 5-5-0 2017 Lumberton 5-5-0 2018 Lumberton 1-9-0 2019 Lumberton 0-10-0 This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Credeur coached Lumberton back in 2007. He hasn't coached at Lumberton since 2015 I believe. Quote
setxathlete14 Posted February 5, 2023 Report Posted February 5, 2023 15 minutes ago, AggiesAreWe said: Credeur coached Lumberton back in 2007. He hasn't coached at Lumberton since 2015 I believe. He has been an assistant at vidor though correct? Quote
AggiesAreWe Posted February 5, 2023 Report Posted February 5, 2023 3 minutes ago, setxathlete14 said: He has been an assistant at vidor though correct? Correct Quote
WOSdrummer99 Posted February 5, 2023 Report Posted February 5, 2023 30 minutes ago, AggiesAreWe said: Credeur coached Lumberton back in 2007. He hasn't coached at Lumberton since 2015 I believe. Thanks for the correction. Lol fixed it Quote
Separation Scientist Posted February 6, 2023 Report Posted February 6, 2023 On 1/26/2023 at 8:02 AM, oldschool2 said: There are always and will always be exceptions to the rule. Especially when a school gets a run of D1 commits through the program. Either way.. it's documented that household income, school tax base, and poverty correlate to success in athletics. To ignore that is just naïve. You should take a field trip to other areas of the state and look at what poor schools are competing with. State of art facilities, immaculate neighborhoods, brand new businesses, etc. Player A (6'4 220) has two working parents, attends summer camps/workouts around the country, has a dietician, has a personal trainer, has a private tutor, has 24hr access to the nicest facilities money can buy, has 3+ of the most nutritious meals imaginable that are specifically designed for health/performance, and has a team full of friends/teammates with the same exact life. Player B (6'4 220) has to work summers/weekends to help around the house, can't afford sports camp, eats whatever happens to be in the house, lifts/trains alone in a 30 year old weight room when he can find a ride, has zero teammates willing to put in extra work with him. Who has the head start, Player A or Player B? If you don't think that and similar scenarios play out across the state... you're either ignorant or stubborn. This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up So is there any correlation to athleticism??? I ask because people whine about "money always wins" which is totally false, but never seem to acknowledge that many "poor" school have overwhelming athleticism. Isn't that a huge, huge advantage? Look at North Shore, one of the most impoverished communities around, they won 3 of the last 4 6A Championships. Your example should compare a 5'10", 185lb "rich kid" who runs a 5.3 with a 15in. vertical, to a 6'1" 190lb "poor kid" who runs a 4.5 with a 22in. vertical. Who would you start? Quote
Setx fan Posted February 6, 2023 Report Posted February 6, 2023 3 hours ago, Separation Scientist said: Your example should compare a 5'10", 185lb "rich kid" who runs a 5.3 with a 15in. vertical, to a 6'1" 190lb "poor kid" who runs a 4.5 with a 22in. vertical. Who would you start? The 5'10" kid will probably have a hard time getting playing time anywhere with that 5.3 40. 😂 I don't think that's the norm Quote
Separation Scientist Posted February 6, 2023 Report Posted February 6, 2023 17 minutes ago, Setx fan said: The 5'10" kid will probably have a hard time getting playing time anywhere with that 5.3 40. 😂 I don't think that's the norm You are just trying to poke a hole in my example. Let me rephrase for YOU: Your example should compare a 5'11", 190lb "rich kid" who runs a 5.1 with a 16in. vertical, to a 6'1" 190lb "poor kid" who runs a 4.5 with a 22in. vertical. Who would you start? Happy now? Setx fan 1 Quote
Setx fan Posted February 6, 2023 Report Posted February 6, 2023 2 minutes ago, Separation Scientist said: You are just trying to poke a hole in my example. Let me rephrase for YOU: Your example should compare a 5'11", 190lb "rich kid" who runs a 5.1 with a 16in. vertical, to a 6'1" 190lb "poor kid" who runs a 4.5 with a 22in. vertical. Who would you start? Happy now? Maybe that'll get it done in 6 man 😂 Quote
Mr. Thornton Melon Posted February 6, 2023 Report Posted February 6, 2023 12 hours ago, WOSdrummer99 said: DWAYNE DUBOIS 9 years 45-51-0 ---staff, Vidor-- 2013 Hardin-Jefferson 8-5-0 T 2014 Hardin-Jefferson 11-2-0 R 2015 Bridge City 7-4-0 T 2016 Bridge City 9-3-0 2017 Bridge City 1-7-0 2018 Hardin-Jefferson 2-8-0 2019 Hardin-Jefferson 1-9-0 F 2020 Hardin-Jefferson 5-5-0 T 2021 Hardin-Jefferson 1-8-0 ALVIN CREDEUR 7 years 34-39-0 2006 Lumberton 4-6-0 2007 Lumberton 11-2-0 C 2008 Lumberton 8-2-0 C 2009 Lumberton 5-5-0 2010 Lumberton 5-5-0 2011 Lumberton 1-9-0 2012 Lumberton 0-10-0 This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up These would be perfect hires for Mathews. If he hired a good coach that had instant success with this program using a different offensive strategy ,then that would prove his philosophy was wrong all along. He knows what he's doing plus all the homeboy assistants get to keep their jobs. He was below .500 doing it his way. It's time for him let it go man, he had his chance and it didn't work. Reagan 1 Quote
oldschool2 Posted February 6, 2023 Report Posted February 6, 2023 13 hours ago, Separation Scientist said: So is there any correlation to athleticism??? I ask because people whine about "money always wins" which is totally false, but never seem to acknowledge that many "poor" school have overwhelming athleticism. Isn't that a huge, huge advantage? Look at North Shore, one of the most impoverished communities around, they won 3 of the last 4 6A Championships. Your example should compare a 5'10", 185lb "rich kid" who runs a 5.3 with a 15in. vertical, to a 6'1" 190lb "poor kid" who runs a 4.5 with a 22in. vertical. Who would you start? In a way, it does correlate to athleticism. Because players with access to money, state of the art facilities, personal trainers, proper nutrition, adequate sleep habits, etc. will likely be in better physical shape than a kid without access to those. It's not the RULE, but it definitely makes it more likely. By the way, and I've been clear about this, it's referring to a LIKLIHOOD. There are always and will always be exceptions. I don't understand why that's so hard to understand. By the way.. which years are you talking about? 20-21 was Austin Westlake and Katy. 21-22 was Northshore and Austin Westlake. Include the 5A champions... Aledo, Guyer, Katy Paetow... you not familiar with the areas? Even if you're correct about 3 out of 4 including this year, look at the last 10 years. Or 15.. list the football state champions for 4A/5A/6A and tell me the percentage of those communities that have an average household income higher than the state average. Not to mention the state champs in all other sports. If you don't see that communities with money have a higher likelihood of success in athletics (not to be confused with athleticism), then your eyes are closed. Quote
CardinalBacker Posted February 6, 2023 Report Posted February 6, 2023 50 minutes ago, oldschool2 said: In a way, it does correlate to athleticism. Because players with access to money, state of the art facilities, personal trainers, proper nutrition, adequate sleep habits, etc. will likely be in better physical shape than a kid without access to those. It's not the RULE, but it definitely makes it more likely. By the way, and I've been clear about this, it's referring to a LIKLIHOOD. There are always and will always be exceptions. I don't understand why that's so hard to understand. By the way.. which years are you talking about? 20-21 was Austin Westlake and Katy. 21-22 was Northshore and Austin Westlake. Include the 5A champions... Aledo, Guyer, Katy Paetow... you not familiar with the areas? Even if you're correct about 3 out of 4 including this year, look at the last 10 years. Or 15.. list the football state champions for 4A/5A/6A and tell me the percentage of those communities that have an average household income higher than the state average. Not to mention the state champs in all other sports. If you don't see that communities with money have a higher likelihood of success in athletics (not to be confused with athleticism), then your eyes are closed. Why don't you use some local examples. Say.... WOS and Newton. Certainly there must have been some affluent school districts in 3A and 4A during those years, right? People use the "facilities" argument as an excuse. I mean, now that you mention it, Newton claimed that they lost that one year because they had to ride Yellow Dogs to Dallas and the competition (Lord, the Competition) got to ride charters. Quote
AthleticSupporter - Jock Posted February 6, 2023 Report Posted February 6, 2023 16 hours ago, AggiesAreWe said: Credeur coached Lumberton back in 2007. He hasn't coached at Lumberton since 2015 I believe. I might be remembering wrong but I believe Credeur's last football season in Lumberton was indeed 2012. 2013 & 2014 were Larry Haynes. Babin started as HC/AD for the 2015 season. Quote
oldschool2 Posted February 6, 2023 Report Posted February 6, 2023 2 hours ago, CardinalBacker said: Why don't you use some local examples. Say.... WOS and Newton. Certainly there must have been some affluent school districts in 3A and 4A during those years, right? People use the "facilities" argument as an excuse. I mean, now that you mention it, Newton claimed that they lost that one year because they had to ride Yellow Dogs to Dallas and the competition (Lord, the Competition) got to ride charters. Even though money can have less impact the smaller the classification... because one or a handful of stud players can change an entire season.. Let's see who knocked out Newton and WOS going back to 2010 10-11 Newton- C.H. Yoe 11-12 Newton- Crockett 12-13 Newton- C.H. Yoe 13-14 Newton- White Oak 14-15 Newton- Waskom 15-16 Newton- Franklin 16-17 Newton- Arp 17-18 Newton- State Title over Gunter 18-19 Newton- State Title over Canadian 19-20 Newton- Daingerfield 20-21 Newton- Omaha Paul Pewitt 21-22 Newton- Waskom 22-23 Newton- Harmony 10-11 WOS- Brookshire-Royal 11-12 WOS- Coldspring 12-13 WOS- Navasota 13-14 WOS- Carthage 14-15 WOS- Gilmer 15-16 WOS- State Title over Celina 16-17 WOS- State Title over Sweetwater 17-18 WOS- Pleasant Grove 18-19 WOS- Silsbee 19-20 WOS- Silsbee 20-21 WOS- China Spring 21-22 WOS- China Spring 22-23 WOS- Bellville You really wanna compare facilities of many of these schools that made them exit? Not all.. but many.. Quote
AggiesAreWe Posted February 6, 2023 Report Posted February 6, 2023 1 hour ago, AthleticSupporter - Jock said: I might be remembering wrong but I believe Credeur's last football season in Lumberton was indeed 2012. 2013 & 2014 were Larry Haynes. Babin started as HC/AD for the 2015 season. Correct. Couldn't remember when Haynes coached those two years. Quote
setxathlete14 Posted February 6, 2023 Report Posted February 6, 2023 15 hours ago, Mr. Thornton Melon said: These would be perfect hires for Mathews. If he hired a good coach that had instant success with this program using a different offensive strategy ,then that would prove his philosophy was wrong all along. He knows what he's doing plus all the homeboy assistants get to keep their jobs. He was below .500 doing it his way. It's time for him let it go man, he had his chance and it didn't work. Offensive strategy does not dictate success Quote
Separation Scientist Posted February 6, 2023 Report Posted February 6, 2023 6 hours ago, oldschool2 said: In a way, it does correlate to athleticism. Because players with access to money, state of the art facilities, personal trainers, proper nutrition, adequate sleep habits, etc. will likely be in better physical shape than a kid without access to those. It's not the RULE, but it definitely makes it more likely. By the way, and I've been clear about this, it's referring to a LIKLIHOOD. There are always and will always be exceptions. I don't understand why that's so hard to understand. By the way.. which years are you talking about? 20-21 was Austin Westlake and Katy. 21-22 was Northshore and Austin Westlake. Include the 5A champions... Aledo, Guyer, Katy Paetow... you not familiar with the areas? Even if you're correct about 3 out of 4 including this year, look at the last 10 years. Or 15.. list the football state champions for 4A/5A/6A and tell me the percentage of those communities that have an average household income higher than the state average. Not to mention the state champs in all other sports. If you don't see that communities with money have a higher likelihood of success in athletics (not to be confused with athleticism), then your eyes are closed. So what exactly are you proposing to help the "poor" teams loaded with D1 athletes, so it will be "fair enough" for them to play affluent schools? What exactly do you think should be done? Endlessly whining about finacial disparaties is not accomplishing anything. Give us specific examples what you think should be done to help out the poor North Shores, WOS's, and Newtons of the world. Do you suggest the UIL should provide cash payments to help out the "poor" 4.5 40 kids? Should the UIL assign a nutritionist to each "poor" athlete? Maybe a state of the art NFL type training facility be built at every "poor" school? Tell us. Quote
oldschool2 Posted February 6, 2023 Report Posted February 6, 2023 56 minutes ago, Separation Scientist said: So what exactly are you proposing to help the "poor" teams loaded with D1 athletes, so it will be "fair enough" for them to play affluent schools? What exactly do you think should be done? Endlessly whining about finacial disparaties is not accomplishing anything. Give us specific examples what you think should be done to help out the poor North Shores, WOS's, and Newtons of the world. Do you suggest the UIL should provide cash payments to help out the "poor" 4.5 40 kids? Should the UIL assign a nutritionist to each "poor" athlete? Maybe a state of the art NFL type training facility be built at every "poor" school? Tell us. I'm not proposing anything. I don't know that anything can be done, actually. In fact, one could argue that it was all of the things I mentioned that money buys that made it possible for kids without the God given athleticism to be competitive. It just got out of control in that direction. Suggestions? I don't have any. There will always be haves and have nots unfortunately. Separation Scientist 1 Quote
Separation Scientist Posted February 6, 2023 Report Posted February 6, 2023 That's exactly right. ^^^ Life, and sports are not fair. Some are blessed with speed, some are not. Some have size, some don't. Some have new facilities, some don't. Some have extra money, some don't. Some have better families, some don't. Some have higher IQ's, some don't. It goes on and on. That's just the way the world ticks. I don't see the point of beating the issue to death. Its general knowledge differences exist across the board. The best thing any player and school can do is take responsibility, maximize whatever you can, and live with the result. Quote
Mr. Thornton Melon Posted February 7, 2023 Report Posted February 7, 2023 NO WAY Crueder is even being considered. He got booted from the OC position because he screwed up the offense soOoo bad and it still hasn't recovered. He did some good things at Lumberton for a couple years but he had some great players with Hannah , Beard & company. After those players graduated he was never successful again. DuBois had two good years in Vidor but he had some great players (EX: Montana Quirante & Company). He also had a few good years at HJ but he had some really good players and never emulated the success after they graduated. Mathews having a losing record and recommending other coaches with losing records is preposterous He's sabotaging the process if this is the case. He shouldn't have a say. Reagan 1 Quote
Mr. Thornton Melon Posted February 7, 2023 Report Posted February 7, 2023 This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Is the VISD website the only place this job is posted ? If so, then it's definitely an inside hire. Does anyone know if it's posted on the thsca.com ? Quote
Bobcat1 Posted February 7, 2023 Report Posted February 7, 2023 Is there a list of applicants anywhere? Quote
setxathlete14 Posted February 7, 2023 Report Posted February 7, 2023 4 minutes ago, Bobcat1 said: Is there a list of applicants anywhere? Creaduer/dubois lol Quote
Mr. Thornton Melon Posted February 7, 2023 Report Posted February 7, 2023 3 hours ago, AHUDDLESTON said: It is not on THSCA. They aren't seeking an outsider then. LOL Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.