Jump to content

22-3A All District Picks


Recommended Posts

One could say that a team that had two superlatives should have made the playoffs.

I think this is the first time I have ever seen a team have two superlatives and not make playoffs. Probably has been done before but I'm not aware of it.

Again, got no problem with Sells being MVP but just wouldn't be my choice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, TxHoops said:

Look these things are a train wreck these days more often than not.  But Perrault has the biggest gripe of anyone. Which in itself is shocking. The Kountze kid over Scales is pretty laughable too.  The real question is who all does Joub have compromising pictures of??

I hope you’re being sarcastic.   Or you just don’t know Joub.  He ain’t that guy.   Courts does a lot for Kountze just like Scales.  Courts was the other player for Kountze that averaged double digits.  No one else made 2nd team for them.  
  Difference I saw,  Scales is on a team with multiple talented teammates and senior heavy.  Perhaps he was over looked ,  good thing is he has 3 more years for awards.   
    I figured Sells would get a top award just wasn’t sure which one.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, AggiesAreWe said:

One could say that a team that had two superlatives should have made the playoffs.

I think this is the first time I have ever seen a team have two superlatives and not make playoffs. Probably has been done before but I'm not aware of it.

Again, got no problem with Sells being MVP but just wouldn't be my choice.

Think Sells was MVP last year as well

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, AggiesAreWe said:

One could say that a team that had two superlatives should have made the playoffs.

I think this is the first time I have ever seen a team have two superlatives and not make playoffs. Probably has been done before but I'm not aware of it.

Again, got no problem with Sells being MVP but just wouldn't be my choice.

I’m wondering the same thing, seems a bit odd. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To me it can’t be done. You take sells off kountze and they are in no different place when the playoffs come. At home watching like us.  You take pete or parrualt off ec or orangefield and things are completely different. To give it to a non playoff team is a disservice to the award. This is not an award to say who the best player in the district in one on one is to me. Maybe I’m wrong 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Knox34 said:

To me it can’t be done. You take sells off kountze and they are in no different place when the playoffs come. At home watching like us.  You take pete or parrualt off ec or orangefield and things are completely different. To give it to a non playoff team is a disservice to the award. This is not an award to say who the best player in the district in one on one is to me. Maybe I’m wrong 

Take sells away and they aren’t finishing tied for 4th I can promise you that…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Knox34 said:

Next time I go to a kountze game I’ll be looking for that tied for 4th play in game banner hanging in the gym 😂

My point was he is the most valuable to his team out of any of the others… as far as banners you wouldn’t find any ties for fourth there… you’d find some state championships and deep playoff runs though 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, BBfan061 said:

My point was he is the most valuable to his team out of any of the others… as far as banners you wouldn’t find any ties for fourth there… you’d find some state championships and deep playoff runs though 

No offense, but being on a team that tied for fourth and you being the best on that team shouldn’t mean you’re the district MVP. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,201
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    JBarry68
    Newest Member
    JBarry68
    Joined



  • Posts

    • naw, maaaaybe 7, definitely not 8 deep.  today im avoiding sitting by #10s parents, had to move away yesterday.   "put my son back in jub, put my son back in"  and then crying on every little touch of someone.    lets ball out today ktz!    
    • Very close game until the 2nd half (mostly the 4th) when Orangefield came unraveled. Worse defensive effort I have seen out of the Bobcats in three years. This team has to get back on D and quit getting beat over the top when pressing. Offensively, non ball handlers continually turn it over and their shot selection is poor. Basic basketball, such as: defensive hustle, boxing out, and taking care of the basketball are the areas the Bobcats need to work on most. Whitmire will get them on point, but he shouldn't have to coach effort at the Varsity Level.  We'll be at McNeese this Friday night at 6pm.
    • I don’t benefit from it, that’s not my area.  But the average cost to imprison someone is around $15k per year (on average in the US) and capital cases cost somewhere between $1.5-$3M with over half being overturned or reduced to life in prison anyway.  These numbers may be inflated since the last report I read but I’m sure it would be on both sides and higher on the DP side if anything. So what’s the point?  We feel better because we got to return the favor on someone (hopefully) who committed a heinous crime?  And I don’t know I can say we have “complicated” it. Which appeal should we cut out?  Our justice system has a pecking order and we have higher courts for a reason. When we are about to impose the ultimate judgment, should we cut steps that other cases have to save a buck?  Or do we not pay for an indigent person’s experts at the trial court level because it’s too expensive? Or do we just lock them up and throw away the key (unless we later find out they weren’t actually guilty, in which case we have a key and a life we haven’t unjustly ended) and save a ton of money?  Seems to me to be an obvious solution but I’m more of a pragmatist.
    • 1 thing for certain. Coach Earned 3 more years to figure it out lol
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...