Beaumont United 53 Clear Falls 48/FINAL

[Steve M.]

On 3/4/2023 at 4:29 PM, TexazBall said:

I could be wrong but It has BU playing Brennan and not Desoto

The UIL went by ranking not by record.

[BEARCPA]

1 hour ago, Steve M. said:

The UIL went by ranking not by record.

Well they got the 2A and 5A pairings wrong then going by your logic.

[Kowboy98]

1 hour ago, Steve M. said:

The UIL went by ranking not by record.

Which ranking?

[AggiesAreWe]

2 hours ago, Steve M. said:

The UIL went by ranking not by record.

UIL goes by win percentage, not rankings 

[Steve M.]

2 hours ago, AggiesAreWe said:

UIL goes by win percentage, not rankings 

This time they didn't. Look at the final rankings. 1. LH 2. United 3.(14. Brennan) 4.(16. De Soto).

[AggiesAreWe]

1 minute ago, Steve M. said:

This time they didn't. Look at the final rankings. 1. LH 2. United 3.(14. Brennan) 4.(16. De Soto).

Still went by win percentage. Top two teams are seeded off win percentage, then a coin flip decides who those two play.

If you look at the other classification match ups, you will see they did not use rankings.

This is how UIL has done the pairings for years.

[Kowboy98]

17 hours ago, AggiesAreWe said:

Still went by win percentage. Top two teams are seeded off win percentage, then a coin flip decides who those two play.

If you look at the other classification match ups, you will see they did not use rankings.

This is how UIL has done the pairings for years.

Had San Marcos made it.. BU would’ve potentially played Lake Highlands in the Friday semifinals with a better overall record (39-3) and SM would’ve been the 2 seed

[AggiesAreWe]

14 minutes ago, Kowboy98 said:

Had San Marcos made it.. BU would’ve potentially played Lake Highlands in the Friday semifinals with a better overall record (39-3) and SM would’ve been the 2 seed

Correct