Winningest programs in Texas High School Football history

[dme1111]

WOS sits on top!!

 

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

[WOSdrummer99]

Just a small bit of information for those who believed this would last forever. All it would take for WOS to lose this distinction is 11 games. WOS goes 0-11 and SLC goes 11-0. I don't think that's about to happen anytime soon. But it just shows how tight this race is becoming. 

The peak was after the 40 game win streak. In 2017 when we beat Wimberley in the semis it was .807

[Dirty_but_Dazzling]

love em or hate em ya gotta respect the Silver&Blue program.

[oldschool2]

Hull Daisetta fans enter the conversation in .. 3. .. 2 .. 1 .. 

[WOSdrummer99]

3 hours ago, Dirty_but_Dazzling said:

love em or hate em ya gotta respect the Silver&Blue program.

I know u love us. But I'm still jealous of the Dawgs. Who knows? Year 2 could be different for us both.

[Bigdog]

5 hours ago, oldschool2 said:

Hull Daisetta fans enter the conversation in .. 3. .. 2 .. 1 .. 

?? with a 58% win percentage??

[CardinalBacker]

 

6 hours ago, WOSdrummer99 said:

Just a small bit of information for those who believed this would last forever. All it would take for WOS to lose this distinction is 11 games. WOS goes 0-11 and SLC goes 11-0. I don't think that's about to happen anytime soon. But it just shows how tight this race is becoming. 

The peak was after the 40 game win streak. In 2017 when we beat Wimberley in the semis it was .807

Where are you finding those win/loss records?  

[Bigdog]

3 minutes ago, CardinalBacker said:

 

Where are you finding those win/loss records?  

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

[CardinalBacker]

6 minutes ago, Bigdog said:

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

I'm no sure that Drummer's math is on point.

WOS   440/109/3.... 0.7971

SLC   584/157/8.... 0.7797

 

I'm too lazy to math out how many games would actually have to be won/lost to make a percentage change to favor SLC, but last year the records were 5-6 to 13-1.  Since SLC has played so many more games than WOS over history, it's harder for SLC to gain ground by winning, but easier for WOS to lose ground by losing.  Another 5-6 season would have WOS at 445/158/8, or 0.790.

[purpleeagle]

Do you think WO-S will rebound next year or did they lose a lot of starters?

[WOSdrummer99]

53 minutes ago, CardinalBacker said:

I'm no sure that Drummer's math is on point.

WOS   440/109/3.... 0.7971

SLC   584/157/8.... 0.7797

 

I'm too lazy to math out how many games would actually have to be won/lost to make a percentage change to favor SLC, but last year the records were 5-6 to 13-1.  Since SLC has played so many more games than WOS over history, it's harder for SLC to gain ground by winning, but easier for WOS to lose ground by losing.  Another 5-6 season would have WOS at 445/158/8, or 0.790.

Trust the #s

           Wins    Total     Win %
WOS   440    552    0.7971
SLC    584    749    0.7797
            
0-1    440    553    0.7957
1-0    585    750    0.7800
            
0-2    440    554    0.7942
2-0    586    751    0.7803
            
0-3    440    555    0.7928
3-0    587    752    0.7806
            
0-4    440    556    0.7914
4-0    588    753    0.7809
            
0-5    440    557    0.7899
5-0    589    754    0.7812
            
0-6    440    558    0.7885
6-0    590    755    0.7815
            
0-7    440    559    0.7871
7-0    591    756    0.7817
            
0-8    440    560    0.7857
8-0    592    757    0.7820
            
0-9    440    561    0.7843
9-0    593    758    0.7823
            
0-10    440    562    0.7829
10-0    594    759    0.7826
            
0-11    440    563    0.7815
11-0    595    760    0.7829

[WOSdrummer99]

1 hour ago, CardinalBacker said:

but last year the records were 5-6 to 13-1

Now this way takes 2 seasons...

wos        440    552    0.7971
slc          584    749    0.7797
 W    L            
  5    6    445    563    0.7904
13    1    597    763    0.7824
                
  5    6    450    574    0.7840
13    1    610    777    0.7851

[CardinalBacker]

21 minutes ago, WOSdrummer99 said:

Trust the #s

           Wins    Total     Win %
WOS   440    552    0.7971
SLC    584    749    0.7797
            
0-1    440    553    0.7957
1-0    585    750    0.7800
            
0-2    440    554    0.7942
2-0    586    751    0.7803
            
0-3    440    555    0.7928
3-0    587    752    0.7806
            
0-4    440    556    0.7914
4-0    588    753    0.7809
            
0-5    440    557    0.7899
5-0    589    754    0.7812
            
0-6    440    558    0.7885
6-0    590    755    0.7815
            
0-7    440    559    0.7871
7-0    591    756    0.7817
            
0-8    440    560    0.7857
8-0    592    757    0.7820
            
0-9    440    561    0.7843
9-0    593    758    0.7823
            
0-10    440    562    0.7829
10-0    594    759    0.7826
            
0-11    440    563    0.7815
11-0    595    760    0.7829

Nice work. 
 

 

[CardinalBacker]

18 minutes ago, WOSdrummer99 said:

Now this way takes 2 seasons...

wos        440    552    0.7971
slc          584    749    0.7797
 W    L            
  5    6    445    563    0.7904
13    1    597    763    0.7824
                
  5    6    450    574    0.7840
13    1    610    777    0.7851

I don’t think it happens in two years, but three-four isn’t unrealistic. 
 

Do the faithful have anything to say about the upcoming season? I was thinking that WOS graduated a bunch of starters, but you’d know better than me. 

[wo-s#1]

36 minutes ago, CardinalBacker said:

I don’t think it happens in two years, but three-four isn’t unrealistic. 
 

Do the faithful have anything to say about the upcoming season? I was thinking that WOS graduated a bunch of starters, but you’d know better than me. 

Had enough return last year to make a difference and as we all know it didn’t!Returning players are irrelevant unless scheme changes imo,hopefully something changes.

[WOSdrummer99]

41 minutes ago, CardinalBacker said:

I don’t think it happens in two years, but three-four isn’t unrealistic. 
 

Do the faithful have anything to say about the upcoming season? I was thinking that WOS graduated a bunch of starters, but you’d know better than me. 

Year 2 will be very interesting. 2 things have to happen. Kids have to be learning the system. System has to be learning the kids. Coaches had their rookie learning curve. Now they know what didn't work. Should be easy. 

[Mr. Buddy Garrity]

30 minutes ago, wo-s#1 said:

Had enough return last year to make a difference and as we all know it didn’t!Returning players are irrelevant unless scheme changes imo,hopefully something changes.

 

9 minutes ago, WOSdrummer99 said:

Year 2 will be very interesting. 2 things have to happen. Kids have to be learning the system. System has to be learning the kids. Coaches had their rookie learning curve. Now they know what didn't work. Should be easy. 

I don't think year 2 will go like year 1, too much talent there. 

 

If they spice up the turkey burgers it might be another special season 🤷🏾‍♂️😁

[wo-s#1]

50 minutes ago, Mr. Buddy Garrity said:

 

I don't think year 2 will go like year 1, too much talent there. 

 

If they spice up the turkey burgers it might be another special season 🤷🏾‍♂️😁

No spice..cut em out completely!Lettuce burgers are it…

[Dirty_but_Dazzling]

Jasper sits at the 87th spot on top win %. 

596-358-30 = .6057

something isn't right though because we are listed as the #33 spot on all time win list with 663.

Both list say they are current thru the 2022 season.

[AggiesAreWe]

1 minute ago, Dirty_but_Dazzling said:

Jasper sits at the 87th spot on top win %. 

596-358-30 = .6057

something isn't right though because we are listed as the #33 spot on all time win list with 663.

Both list say they are current thru the 2022 season.

I have found over the years that the more sites you visit on records, the more differences each show.

If I found two with the same numbers, I went with that.

[WOSdrummer99]

3 hours ago, Dirty_but_Dazzling said:

Jasper sits at the 87th spot on top win %. 

596-358-30 = .6057

something isn't right though because we are listed as the #33 spot on all time win list with 663.

Both list say they are current thru the 2022 season.

No it's right. The numbers just don't line up on the win % list. Jasper is 10 up from the bottom of this list.

663-394-38 = .6055

[Bigdog]

10 hours ago, AggiesAreWe said:

I have found over the years that the more sites you visit on records, the more differences each show.

If I found two with the same numbers, I went with that.

I tend to use the site I linked, since it is using Joe Lee Smiths numbers and he was a known historian of the game and usually pretty accurate.

[Dirty_but_Dazzling]

38 minutes ago, Bigdog said:

I tend to use the site I linked, since it is using Joe Lee Smiths numbers and he was a known historian of the game and usually pretty accurate.

the numbers I posted come from there.

[Dirty_but_Dazzling]

Just now, Dirty_but_Dazzling said:

the numbers I posted come from there.

the most trusted reference I use for Texas Highschool football. 

[oldschool2]

15 hours ago, Bigdog said:

?? with a 58% win percentage??

It was a joke.. you know how they like to throw around the past.  I just figured somebody might say something about historical something in bobcat land (still might).