Justice Clarence Thomas accepted several luxury trips paid for by GOP megadonor, ProPublica report finds

[Bobcat1]

I'm torn on this - Should he NOT be able to travel with his friends because he's a GOP donor? 

 

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

[WOSdrummer99]

21 minutes ago, Bobcat1 said:

I'm torn on this - Should be NOT be able to travel with his friends because he's a GOP donor? 

 

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

No need to be torn over this. More like squeezed.

From the article...

Key Senate Democrats were previously mulling using this year’s funding legislation for the Supreme Court to pressure the justices to adopt some sort of ethics code.

[Bobcat1]

It's not his fault he has rich friends. 

[tvc184]

1. Did he break any rules?

2. Have other justices done or were allowed to the same consideration?

[Separation Scientist]

And Dim Eric Swalwell has sex with a Chineese SPY named Christine Fang, and its willfully ignored by the media and the public.

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

  

[LumRaiderFan]

7 hours ago, tvc184 said:

1. Did he break any rules?

2. Have other justices done or were allowed to the same consideration?

Agree, these are the questions to be asked.

cnn putting their unbiased due diligence on display.

[Bobcat1]

New report states that the same donor bouth three homes of Thomas and family....That's a bit odd. 

[UT alum]

On 4/6/2023 at 1:30 PM, Bobcat1 said:

I'm torn on this - Should he NOT be able to travel with his friends because he's a GOP donor? 

 

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

He should report it at the very least.  Clarence Thomas lacks ethics. I don’t think that of any other Justice, conservative or liberal. 

[DonTheCon2024]

10 minutes ago, Bobcat1 said:

New report states that the same donor bouth three homes of Thomas and family....That's a bit odd. 

Blatant and obvious corruption but hunter Biden is a crackhead so it evens out.. let’s focus on that instead 

[baddog]

1 hour ago, UT alum said:

He should report it at the very least.  Clarence Thomas lacks ethics. I don’t think that of any other Justice, conservative or liberal. 

I’ll bet he can define a woman.

[DonTheCon2024]

10 minutes ago, baddog said:

I’ll bet he can define a woman.

Wow very clever, good job traitordog! 

[UT alum]

2 hours ago, baddog said:

I’ll bet he can define a woman.

No doubt. He sexually harassed plenty of them. I’ll bet he lets Crow call him “boy”.

[thetragichippy]

3 hours ago, UT alum said:

He should report it at the very least.  Clarence Thomas lacks ethics. I don’t think that of any other Justice, conservative or liberal. 

Why should he report something that is not required? Let alone never been a issue until now.

[thetragichippy]

2 hours ago, DonTheCon2024 said:

Wow very clever, good job traitordog! 

Why do you have to name call directly to members? Is it a personal issue or what?

[baddog]

18 minutes ago, UT alum said:

No doubt. He sexually harassed plenty of them. I’ll bet he lets Crow call him “boy”.

Was he convicted or are these just your accusations? My previous answer was to show how trivial your answer was.

[DonTheCon2024]

57 minutes ago, thetragichippy said:

Why should he report something that is not required? Let alone never been a issue until now.

Transparency? Conflicts of interest?

Not that any of that matters anymore, obviously 

[DonTheCon2024]

58 minutes ago, thetragichippy said:

Why do you have to name call directly to members? Is it a personal issue or what?

Oh come on man the conservatives on here have infinite name calls but you’re on my case now for traitordog?

It’s like when not a single person cared about “libtard” for literal yearssss.. until I started using “magatard” 🤔

[thetragichippy]

2 hours ago, DonTheCon2024 said:

Oh come on man the conservatives on here have infinite name calls but you’re on my case now for traitordog?

It’s like when not a single person cared about “libtard” for literal yearssss.. until I started using “magatard” 🤔

Posting is optional if you don't like the rules.  We also allow general calls outs "libtards" and even "magtards".....you went directly to him......just chill with those type remarks and you will be fine......

[Unwoke]

3 hours ago, baddog said:

Was he convicted or are these just your accusations? My previous answer was to show how trivial your answer was.

You want get an answer because the diarrhea coming out of his mouth has zero fact to support it. Just like the Kavanaugh situation. 
 

[baddog]

2 hours ago, Unwoke said:

You want get an answer because the diarrhea coming out of his mouth has zero fact to support it. Just like the Kavanaugh situation. 
 

Funny how mis-placed priorities some people possess. Condemning a conservative justice for private jet fees, whereas you hear nothing about John Kerry, aka. Climate Czar and biggest polluter in the world. 
 

Let’s see……who would I rather have passing judgement on a SC case……a man who may have questionable funds for a jet flight, or a woman who doesn’t have the capacity to define a woman. Give me a second……duh.

Petty nit picking vs. unbelievable oversight.

[Unwoke]

Has the Supreme Court Leaker been found yet? 

[BS Wildcats]

3 hours ago, Unwoke said:

Has the Supreme Court Leaker been found yet? 

Nah, he/she is a Demoncrat!  

[UT alum]

On 4/14/2023 at 1:14 PM, thetragichippy said:

Why should he report something that is not required? Let alone never been a issue until now.

Real estate transactions grater than $1000 are required.

[UT alum]

On 4/14/2023 at 1:16 PM, baddog said:

Was he convicted or are these just your accusations? My previous answer was to show how trivial your answer was.

Heresay in general, though  Anita Hill was under oath. Indicates a pattern. Kinda like “ grab ‘em by the...

[baddog]

2 hours ago, UT alum said:

Heresay in general, though  Anita Hill was under oath. Indicates a pattern. Kinda like “ grab ‘em by the...

No comparison at all.