Jump to content

Why Did Fake News Settle for $800 Million Payment, Then Fire Tucker Carlson?


DonTheCon2024

Recommended Posts

The red hatter experts told me Fox News would win the lawsuit easily as they had all the proof the election was stolen.. but then folded like a lawn chair in court and agreed to pay $800 million, andddd then canned their most watched entertainment show hosted by tucker carlson

 

whyd fake news Fox News do this? Did the liberals infiltrate the company? Will the red hatters ever get their head outta their?? 
 

How on earth do the red hatters keep falling for one scam after another?!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DonTheCon2024 said:

The red hatter experts told me Fox News would win the lawsuit easily as they had all the proof the election was stolen.. but then folded like a lawn chair in court and agreed to pay $800 million, andddd then canned their most watched entertainment show hosted by tucker carlson

 

whyd fake news Fox News do this? Did the liberals infiltrate the company? Will the red hatters ever get their head outta their?? 
 

How on earth do the red hatters keep falling for one scam after another?!

I like folded like a cheap suit. Rupert obviously builds court settlements into cost-benefit analysis of how he presents news.  I really believe he canned him because of the disparaging emails about him, Lachlan, and other senior management. Pride overrode profit. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DonTheCon2024 said:

The red hatter experts told me Fox News would win the lawsuit easily as they had all the proof the election was stolen.. but then folded like a lawn chair in court and agreed to pay $800 million, andddd then canned their most watched entertainment show hosted by tucker carlson

 

whyd fake news Fox News do this? Did the liberals infiltrate the company? Will the red hatters ever get their head outta their?? 
 

How on earth do the red hatters keep falling for one scam after another?!

Blackrock owns 59.M shares of Dominion.

Blackrock owns 45.7M shares of Fox.

Blackrock sued itself and fired

TuckerCarlson as part of that lawsuit.

FIGURED IT OUT YET?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Unwoke said:

Blackrock owns 59.M shares of Dominion.

Blackrock owns 45.7M shares of Fox.

Blackrock sued itself and fired

TuckerCarlson as part of that lawsuit.

FIGURED IT OUT YET?

What are you even talking about? BlackRock is the world’s largest asset manager. An investment fund. That’s what they do. Buy and sell stocks and bonds. They don’t tell companies how to operate. They invest in them according to their anticipated performance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, UT alum said:

What are you even talking about? BlackRock is the world’s largest asset manager. An investment fund. That’s what they do. Buy and sell stocks and bonds. They don’t tell companies how to operate. They invest in them according to their anticipated performance.

Do your homework.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DonTheCon2024 said:

You got trump bucks, Biden bucks, and still in debt lmao

 

bless your heart twitter man 

Don’t really know what that’s suppose to mean but bless little heart and I hope you get to move out of mom and dad’s house one day. 😘

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, tvc184 said:

FN didn’t want Carlson to take the stand.

To stop that from happening, they offered to settle for less that half of the suit was asking for. Part of the settlement was to get rid of Carlson. 

I wonder why they wouldn’t want Tucker to take the stand? We wouldn’t want to open up the book of Discovery. I mean Dominion is all on the up and up. Lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Separation Scientist said:

They can easily afforsd the SMALL part they will pay. Insurance will cover most of it, then the massive amount of advertizing revenue Fox gets will easily pay for the rest of it. I think Fox had higher ratings then all the commie / leftie news, COMBINED. 

Duh Fox News is the literal definition of main stream media. #1 channel.

Yet the redhatters jump through hoops trying to explain how the it isn’t main stream media.

If the scum bags are on record for lying to drive ratings, and you still watch/believe/support, then what does that make you? Well, it makes you the biggest SUCKERS on earth 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DonTheCon2024 said:

Duh Fox News is the literal definition of main stream media. #1 channel.

Yet the redhatters jump through hoops trying to explain how the it isn’t main stream media.

If the scum bags are on record for lying to drive ratings, and you still watch/believe/support, then what does that make you? Well, it makes you the biggest SUCKERS on earth 

I am not a "red hatter" at all. I have clearly said this before but you still don't get it. Trump DERANGEMENT syndrome will do that to you. Sorry but I will never vote for a Democrat party that thrives on perversion, immorality, and hate of America. 

Have a blessed day. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Separation Scientist said:

I am not a "red hatter" at all. I have clearly said this before but you still don't get it. Trump DERANGEMENT syndrome will do that to you. Sorry but I will never vote for a Democrat party that thrives on perversion, immorality, and hate of America. 

Have a blessed day. 

You are delusional (and a sucker)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/25/2023 at 10:31 AM, DonTheCon2024 said:

The red hatter experts told me Fox News would win the lawsuit easily as they had all the proof the election was stolen.. but then folded like a lawn chair in court and agreed to pay $800 million, andddd then canned their most watched entertainment show hosted by tucker carlson

 

whyd fake news Fox News do this? Did the liberals infiltrate the company? Will the red hatters ever get their head outta their?? 
 

How on earth do the red hatters keep falling for one scam after another?!

Ummmmm..... because he just cost them 800 million for spreading lies, and was a complete jerk to everyone in the building, apparently.  

Also the fact that, while his ratings were good, high-profile advertisers refused to have their ads ran during Tucker's program because they'd undoubtedly fact backlash every time he blasted on his dog whistle or just outright lied like he did regarding election fraud. His program didn't generate advertising revenue like a show with that type of ratings typically does.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,201
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    JBarry68
    Newest Member
    JBarry68
    Joined


  • Posts

    • naw, maaaaybe 7, definitely not 8 deep.  today im avoiding sitting by #10s parents, had to move away yesterday.   "put my son back in jub, put my son back in"  and then crying on every little touch of someone.    lets ball out today ktz!    
    • Very close game until the 2nd half (mostly the 4th) when Orangefield came unraveled. Worse defensive effort I have seen out of the Bobcats in three years. This team has to get back on D and quit getting beat over the top when pressing. Offensively, non ball handlers continually turn it over and their shot selection is poor. Basic basketball, such as: defensive hustle, boxing out, and taking care of the basketball are the areas the Bobcats need to work on most. Whitmire will get them on point, but he shouldn't have to coach effort at the Varsity Level.  We'll be at McNeese this Friday night at 6pm.
    • I don’t benefit from it, that’s not my area.  But the average cost to imprison someone is around $15k per year (on average in the US) and capital cases cost somewhere between $1.5-$3M with over half being overturned or reduced to life in prison anyway.  These numbers may be inflated since the last report I read but I’m sure it would be on both sides and higher on the DP side if anything. So what’s the point?  We feel better because we got to return the favor on someone (hopefully) who committed a heinous crime?  And I don’t know I can say we have “complicated” it. Which appeal should we cut out?  Our justice system has a pecking order and we have higher courts for a reason. When we are about to impose the ultimate judgment, should we cut steps that other cases have to save a buck?  Or do we not pay for an indigent person’s experts at the trial court level because it’s too expensive? Or do we just lock them up and throw away the key (unless we later find out they weren’t actually guilty, in which case we have a key and a life we haven’t unjustly ended) and save a ton of money?  Seems to me to be an obvious solution but I’m more of a pragmatist.
    • 1 thing for certain. Coach Earned 3 more years to figure it out lol
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...