Jump to content

SCOTUS slaps down Bidens deadbeat student loan scheme!


Recommended Posts

26 minutes ago, CardinalBacker said:

Like I said… I see a success story.  Jesse Jackson was with MLK in Memphis the day he was killed… he later sat on the platform when the first black President was sworn in… what a great story. You say “oh, yeah, but why is that the only black President we’ve ever had. The next 40 should all be black, too…. We deserve it.” You never can escape from being a victim. I agree with you, though… Obama was a fine politician. He got himself elected and re-elected…. And trump is an idiot… but apparently a lot of idiots like him, too. 

Obama was a fine politician...but a horrible President.  I would have to say the true idiots are those can can be swayed to overlook poor policies with even poorer results simply because they are presented with a smooth delivery.

But I didn't mean to get you sidetracked, back to your berating of the Black community.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, LumRaiderFan said:

Obama was a fine politician...but a horrible President.  I would have to say the true idiots are those can can be swayed to overlook poor policies with even poorer results simply because they are presented with a smooth delivery.

But I didn't mean to get you sidetracked, back to your berating of the Black community.

It’s just the world we live in. I was watching CBS News a couple of weeks ago and they were talking with the MLB commissioner. Keep in mind that 3 of the 4 talking heads in the morning are black. The news guy hopped straight over the big news about the upcoming season to ask about any plans that the MLB has to “fix” the lack of diversity in the big leagues. Like… that’s what you want to ask about? Are we just going to pretend that the NBA isn’t almost completely comprised of black millionaires? The makeup of the nfl doesn’t reflect our racial percentages, either… but we gotta do something about baseball!!!

I’m not berating the black community… I’m berating stupidity. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/4/2023 at 11:32 AM, Big girl said:

How did they have the same opportunities? Did your parents have to ride in the back of the bus, were their family members lynched? Could they eat at restaurants, could they stay at any hotel that they wished? Yes, my parents did not have that luxery. Were your parents denied opportunities because of their race? Were they told they were not good enough, because of their skin color? You should be ashamed of yourself, you cannot erase the past or minimize what my parents have endured.

Ma’am, while I’ll take your stories as true, the atrocities you speak of are in the past. Let me ask you this. Is it fair for a more qualified candidate based only on merit to NOT be admitted based solely on his hot her race?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, CardinalBacker said:

It’s just the world we live in. I was watching CBS News a couple of weeks ago and they were talking with the MLB commissioner. Keep in mind that 3 of the 4 talking heads in the morning are black. The news guy hopped straight over the big news about the upcoming season to ask about any plans that the MLB has to “fix” the lack of diversity in the big leagues. Like… that’s what you want to ask about? Are we just going to pretend that the NBA isn’t almost completely comprised of black millionaires? The makeup of the nfl doesn’t reflect our racial percentages, either… but we gotta do something about baseball!!!

I’m not berating the black community… I’m berating stupidity. 

This is the hidden content, please

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, SmashMouth said:

Ma’am, while I’ll take your stories as true, the atrocities you speak of are in the past. Let me ask you this. Is it fair for a more qualified candidate based only on merit to NOT be admitted based solely on his hot her race?

Nope.The fact that unqualified whites get jobs merely because of their race infuriates me. It works both ways. You act like blacks are the only group this applies to. White people have always had the upper hand. Jobs should be based on merit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, CardinalBacker said:

It’s just the world we live in. I was watching CBS News a couple of weeks ago and they were talking with the MLB commissioner. Keep in mind that 3 of the 4 talking heads in the morning are black. The news guy hopped straight over the big news about the upcoming season to ask about any plans that the MLB has to “fix” the lack of diversity in the big leagues. Like… that’s what you want to ask about? Are we just going to pretend that the NBA isn’t almost completely comprised of black millionaires? The makeup of the nfl doesn’t reflect our racial percentages, either… but we gotta do something about baseball!!!

I’m not berating the black community… I’m berating stupidity. 

Unless you are black and grew up before the Civil Rights Act you don't have a right to tell me that blacks and whites had the same opportunities, and that only a few blacks experienced racism. The unmitigated gall of some of you people. (CardinalBacker)

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Big girl said:

Unless you are black and grew up before the Civil Rights Act you don't have a right to tell me that blacks and whites had the same opportunities, and that only a few blacks experienced racism. The unmitigated gall of some of you people. (CardinalBacker)

 

 

 

What gives you the right to tell anybody anything?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Big girl said:

Nope.The fact that unqualified whites get jobs merely because of their race infuriates me. It works both ways. You act like blacks are the only group this applies to. White people have always had the upper hand. Jobs should be based on merit.

Not sure what the argument is here, you seem to agree that jobs / college admission should be awarded to the most qualified applicant and race should play no part in the decision making process, correct?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LumRaiderFan said:

Not sure what the argument is here, you seem to agree that jobs / college admission should be awarded to the most qualified applicant and race should play no part in the decision making process, correct?

Yes. What affirmative action entails is the issue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Big girl said:

Nope.The fact that unqualified whites get jobs merely because of their race infuriates me. It works both ways. You act like blacks are the only group this applies to. White people have always had the upper hand. Jobs should be based on merit.

Why do you say I act in that manner? I merely asked you a question. 
Does it bother you that an Asian may get passed up by a less qualified black person for college admission?

I think that the selection process should be based solely on merit and never based on race…even if that means a white person is passed over by a more qualified minority. Do you agree?
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Big girl said:

Unless you are black and grew up before the Civil Rights Act you don't have a right to tell me that blacks and whites had the same opportunities, and that only a few blacks experienced racism. The unmitigated gall of some of you people. (CardinalBacker)

The Civil Rights act was passed in 1964.....I was born in 1965 and I feel I'm older than you.....so you didn't grow up before the civil rights act either......so we are BOTH making our opinions based on research.......You being black does not give you some knowledge about it I don't have. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SmashMouth said:

Why do you say I act in that manner? I merely asked you a question. 
Does it bother you that an Asian may get passed up by a less qualified black person for college admission?

I think that the selection process should be based solely on merit and never based on race…even if that means a white person is passed over by a more qualified minority. Do you agree?
 

That's exactly what was happening and as to why an Asian-American family was the one who was suing to get it changed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Big girl said:

Yes. What affirmative action entails is the issue.

Funny how you people screamed integration for years, now that you have accomplished that, you scream for segregation. Make up your freaking mind. I’m sick of your crying. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Big girl said:

This is the hidden content, please

They’re comparing apples to oranges. They’re basically saying that things are much better now for blacks than in the 1960s, but since blacks as a group lag behind, it’s proof of racism. You know who has done fantastically in the same timeframe? Africans who migrated here since 1964 and married black couples… their numbers are identical or better than white peoples’. Why does racism only seem to affect single parent black households and not two-parent households like yours? Certainly there must be some reason… oh, I forgot… “racism.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, CardinalBacker said:

They’re comparing apples to oranges. They’re basically saying that things are much better now for blacks than in the 1960s, but since blacks as a group lag behind, it’s proof of racism. You know who has done fantastically in the same timeframe? Africans who migrated here since 1964 and married black couples… their numbers are identical or better than white peoples’. Why does racism only seem to affect single parent black households and not two-parent households like yours? Certainly there must be some reason… oh, I forgot… “racism.”

Thank you! You beat me to it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Big girl said:

Nope.The fact that unqualified whites get jobs merely because of their race infuriates me. It works both ways. You act like blacks are the only group this applies to. White people have always had the upper hand. Jobs should be based on merit.

First, you don’t know who was unqualified or qualified. 
 

Let’s say that a job opening pops up. 10 people apply, and they match the population perfectly. 6 whites, three Hispanics, and one black all apply… and a white person gets the job. In your mind, the white person got the job because they were white. What about the other five white guys and the three Hispanics that didn’t get hired? Doesn’t matter to you, the guy that got hired was hired because he was white. 
 

But further, Affirmative Action argues that the job belongs to the black guy, even if he was the worst qualified-because he’s black. 
 

The NFL has the Rooney Rule for coaches. At least one minority candidate must be interviewed any time that a coaching opening comes available. Sounds great… even if it is a little unnecessary because most organizations are already interviewing multiple minority candidates. But that’s where the problem comes in… let’s say that you’re Jerry Jones and you know that you want Jason Garrett to be the next head coach… but you do a few interviews to appease the nfl/minorities even though you’ve already got your guy picked out. Now everybody is mad because you wasted minority applicants’ time when you had no intention of hiring them. You literally can’t win. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CardinalBacker said:

First, you don’t know who was unqualified or qualified. 
 

Let’s say that a job opening pops up. 10 people apply, and they match the population perfectly. 6 whites, three Hispanics, and one black all apply… and a white person gets the job. In your mind, the white person got the job because they were white. What about the other five white guys and the three Hispanics that didn’t get hired? Doesn’t matter to you, the guy that got hired was hired because he was white. 
 

But further, Affirmative Action argues that the job belongs to the black guy, even if he was the worst qualified-because he’s black. 
 

The NFL has the Rooney Rule for coaches. At least one minority candidate must be interviewed any time that a coaching opening comes available. Sounds great… even if it is a little unnecessary because most organizations are already interviewing multiple minority candidates. But that’s where the problem comes in… let’s say that you’re Jerry Jones and you know that you want Jason Garrett to be the next head coach… but you do a fewnot interviews to appease the nfl/minorities even though you’ve already got your guy picked out. Now everybody is mad because you wasted minority applicants’ time when you had no intention of hiring them. You literally can’t win. 

Not true.

This is the hidden content, please

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, Big girl said:

Not true.

This is the hidden content, please

This is straight off the link above. Click the About Us in the Menu Button.

“Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion at Upstate

Employers with diverse employees get fresh ideas and different perspectives. The leadership at SUNY

Upstate Medical University promotes and supports a diverse workforce.

SUNY Upstate Medical University maintains

Affirmative Action Programs, which assist in achieving diversity, preventing discrimination, and ensuring equal employment opportunity.”

This /\ /\

Sounds like a Racist Organization to me.
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, SmashMouth said:

Why do you say I act in that manner? I merely asked you a question. 
Does it bother you that an Asian may get passed up by a less qualified black person for college admission?

I think that the selection process should be based solely on merit and never based on race…even if that means a white person is passed over by a more qualified minority. Do you agree?
 

Or a less qualified white person. Does that bother you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Unwoke said:

This is straight off the link above. Click the About Us in the Menu Button.

“Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion at Upstate

Employers with diverse employees get fresh ideas and different perspectives. The leadership at SUNY

Upstate Medical University promotes and supports a diverse workforce.

SUNY Upstate Medical University maintains

Affirmative Action Programs, which assist in achieving diversity, preventing discrimination, and ensuring equal employment opportunity.”

This /\ /\

Sounds like a Racist Organization to me.
 

Preventing discrimination against qualified minority applicants.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,201
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    JBarry68
    Newest Member
    JBarry68
    Joined



  • Posts

    • Very close game until the 2nd half (mostly the 4th) when Orangefield came unraveled. Worse defensive effort I have seen out of the Bobcats in three years. This team has to get back on D and quit getting beat over the top when pressing. Offensively, non ball handlers continually turn it over and their shot selection is poor. Basic basketball, such as: defensive hustle, boxing out, and taking care of the basketball are the areas the Bobcats need to work on most. Whitmire will get them on point, but he shouldn't have to coach effort at the Varsity Level. 
    • I don’t benefit from it, that’s not my area.  But the average cost to imprison someone is around $15k per year (on average in the US) and capital cases cost somewhere between $1.5-$3M with over half being overturned or reduced to life in prison anyway.  These numbers may be inflated since the last report I read but I’m sure it would be on both sides and higher on the DP side if anything. So what’s the point?  We feel better because we got to return the favor on someone (hopefully) who committed a heinous crime?  And I don’t know I can say we have “complicated” it. Which appeal should we cut out?  Our justice system has a pecking order and we have higher courts for a reason. When we are about to impose the ultimate judgment, should we cut steps that other cases have to save a buck?  Or do we not pay for an indigent person’s experts at the trial court level because it’s too expensive? Or do we just lock them up and throw away the key (unless we later find out they weren’t actually guilty, in which case we have a key and a life we haven’t unjustly ended) and save a ton of money?  Seems to me to be an easy and obvious solution but I’m more of a pragmatist.
    • 1 thing for certain. Coach Earned 3 more years to figure it out lol
    • @CIS_org National Security Senior Fellow @BensmanTodd tells Steve Bannon how the U.S. State Department and USAID have been sending American taxpayer funds to religious nonprofits to facilitate mass immigration to our southern border. Bensman says 248 nonprofits are participating in the United Nations’ 2024 agenda to distribute $1.6 billion in cash, transportation, food, and shelter to U.S.-bound immigrants across Mexico and Latin America.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...