Pronoun felony

[5GallonBucket]

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

 

sexual deviants galore.

that’s where we are headed

how bout I just refer to you as “it”

[LumRaiderFan]

10 minutes ago, 5GallonBucket said:

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

 

sexual deviants galore.

that’s where we are headed

how bout I just refer to you as “it”

🤦‍♂️ Good grief!

[baddog]

How  does one know which pronoun to use? Serious question. I agree with 5 gallon, after male and female ( which are not pronouns) anything else is “It”.

[5GallonBucket]

6 hours ago, baddog said:

How  does one know which pronoun to use? Serious question. I agree with 5 gallon, after male and female ( which are not pronouns) anything else is “It”.

They want us to know what pronoun to use but they themselves don’t even know what they are.

[baddog]

Seems to me that the left is looking to pin frivolous felonies on people so they can be denied gun ownership.

[tvc184]

It seems like a stupid law but using the “wrong” pronoun is not a crime in the proposed law. If it was, it would be nullified by the First Amendment.

Basically they want to add pronouns to hate crimes. 

[baddog]

4 hours ago, tvc184 said:

It seems like a stupid law but using the “wrong” pronoun is not a crime in the proposed law. If it was, it would be nullified by the First Amendment.

Basically they want to add pronouns to hate crimes. 

Yes sir. I read the article and agree about First Amendment violations, but from the article:

A recently passed bill in Michigan could make it a felony to intimidate someone by intentionally using the wrong gender pronouns, according to some legal experts.

Under the new bill, offenders are "guilty of a felony punishable by imprisonment for not more than 5 years, or by a fine of not more than $10,000."

 

[5GallonBucket]

1 hour ago, baddog said:

Yes sir. I read the article and agree about First Amendment violations, but from the article:

A recently passed bill in Michigan could make it a felony to intimidate someone by intentionally using the wrong gender pronouns, according to some legal experts.

Under the new bill, offenders are "guilty of a felony punishable by imprisonment for not more than 5 years, or by a fine of not more than $10,000."

 

Liberals at its finest just causing more red tape

law should be made for lying about what gender you really are….the one your born with.

 

 

[tvc184]

8 hours ago, baddog said:

Yes sir. I read the article and agree about First Amendment violations, but from the article:

A recently passed bill in Michigan could make it a felony to intimidate someone by intentionally using the wrong gender pronouns, according to some legal experts.

Under the new bill, offenders are "guilty of a felony punishable by imprisonment for not more than 5 years, or by a fine of not more than $10,000."

 

Therein lies the problem of relying on articles for court rulings.

 The “some legal experts” (whatever those are) is a clue. Some legal experts think that the Second Amendment doesn’t apply to private gun ownership. See how that works. 

 The proposed law ( it is not a law as of yet)  doesn’t say anything about pronouns. It says that intimidation of another person due to sex, race, religion, age, sexual orientation, gender identity, etc., is a hate crime. That’s it. 

So apparently some people would have you believe that it is perhaps okay to file charges on a person if he is intimidating or threatening another person due to his sex, or sexual orientation, or race, etc., but if you do the same because a man wants to dress in dresses, it is okay.

Here if the proposed law….

It is a crime to use force or violence against a person, cause bodily injury, intimidate, damage-destroy or deface property or threaten any of those actions. 

That is the proposed law.

I generally don’t like hate laws but this discussion (news articles) has a lot of political spin from the “experts”.