Jump to content

2023 Participation Numbers


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, MrFleet23 said:

A head scratcher. That 8th grade team last year was packed football and bball. 

Yeah, probably had over 40 kids on B team alone last year. We still have a lot of talent left in the class even after the three major transfers, no doubt all three had a huge impact though. Little Jerry would’ve probably been the backup varsity QB and there’s a good chance the freshman receiver that transferred to North Shore would’ve started in that spread offense we used to run. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Cougar14.2 said:

Yeah, probably had over 40 kids on B team alone last year. We still have a lot of talent left in the class even after the three major transfers, no doubt all three had a huge impact though. Little Jerry would’ve probably been the backup varsity QB and there’s a good chance the freshman receiver that transferred to North Shore would’ve started in that spread offense we used to run. 

the way these kids transfer around now you would think this is a college football.   What's next?   Teams changing divisions or classifications for more TV money?? LOL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Bigdog said:

the way these kids transfer around now you would think this is a college football.   What's next?   Teams changing divisions or classifications for more TV money?? LOL.

It’s just part of the game now, especially at these metro area schools. You can either get with it or complain while you’re getting rolled over. Those Dallas County all-star teams won 3 of the 4 5A/6A state titles. Aledo won the other one and what do you know, they just got a big time running back in the offseason. Even teams that you consider more homegrown like SLC just got a big time running back transfer denied. I’m not a fan but looking around the country the Texas transfer rules seem to be a lot more strict than some of the other around the country. 

I guarantee you if TV money ever got seriously integrated into THSF the UIL would cease to exist, kind of like the NCAA doesn’t now since they started to let conference commissioners negotiate their own TV contracts. You could probably get a six figure payout from the local Jefferson County TV station for the rights to the PNG/NED/PAM/BMT games.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Cougar14.2 said:

It’s just part of the game now, especially at these metro area schools. You can either get with it or complain while you’re getting rolled over. Those Dallas County all-star teams won 3 of the 4 5A/6A state titles. Aledo won the other one and what do you know, they just got a big time running back in the offseason. Even teams that you consider more homegrown like SLC just got a big time running back transfer denied. I’m not a fan but looking around the country the Texas transfer rules seem to be a lot more strict than some of the other around the country. 

I guarantee you if TV money ever got seriously integrated into THSF the UIL would cease to exist, kind of like the NCAA doesn’t now since they started to let conference commissioners negotiate their own TV contracts. You could probably get a six figure payout from the local Jefferson County TV station for the rights to the PNG/NED/PAM/BMT games.  

Yep.  Is agree about the NCAA it is irrelevant as entity other than maybe some enforcement.  As far as TV/streaming here local, there are already 3rd party companies that stream games for ISDs especially after the UIL relaxed the rules during Covid and then left them that way. KLVI has had Ned football for years on the radio and now works with Sheffield to stream.  92.5 has PNG for radio for years,  I don’t know who streams their games. I’m sure the Districts get a cut of that.  Just leaves TV rights whenever the UIL finally allows it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Bigdog said:

Yep.  Is agree about the NCAA it is irrelevant as entity other than maybe some enforcement.  As far as TV/streaming here local, there are already 3rd party companies that stream games for ISDs especially after the UIL relaxed the rules during Covid and then left them that way. KLVI has had Ned football for years on the radio and now works with Sheffield to stream.  92.5 has PNG for radio for years,  I don’t know who streams their games. I’m sure the Districts get a cut of that.  Just leaves TV rights whenever the UIL finally allows it.

Png games can be seen on Texan Live. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Bigdog said:

Yep.  Is agree about the NCAA it is irrelevant as entity other than maybe some enforcement.  As far as TV/streaming here local, there are already 3rd party companies that stream games for ISDs especially after the UIL relaxed the rules during Covid and then left them that way. KLVI has had Ned football for years on the radio and now works with Sheffield to stream.  92.5 has PNG for radio for years,  I don’t know who streams their games. I’m sure the Districts get a cut of that.  Just leaves TV rights whenever the UIL finally allows it.

I know you can currently catch streams, TV games or radio broadcasts. What I'm saying is if you could negotiate the rights to those games there would be financial incentives for the schools. Every Crosby game is streamed on Texan Live, Texan Live makes money off Crosby games since people pay for subscriptions to the streaming service. Crosby makes 0 dollars off the stream though. If Crosby owned the rights to those games then in theory Crosby could make Texan Live pay for the privilege of of  broadcasting them similar to the way the SEC owns the rights to their games and CBS pays them $100's of millions a year to to broadcast them. Right now for the most part those games are being shown for free because the school just likes the fact they're on whatever media platform wants them. 

If the Jefferson County schools told all the media platforms "No, you can't broadcast our event without compensation" there's absolutely a local channel that would pay for the rights to show them. That channel would make significant add revenue, relative to high school sports, if that was the ONLY place you could see them.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, Cougar14.2 said:

I know you can currently catch streams, TV games or radio broadcasts. What I'm saying is if you could negotiate the rights to those games there would be financial incentives for the schools. Every Crosby game is streamed on Texan Live, Texan Live makes money off Crosby games since people pay for subscriptions to the streaming service. Crosby makes 0 dollars off the stream though. If Crosby owned the rights to those games then in theory Crosby could make Texan Live pay for the privilege of of  broadcasting them similar to the way the SEC owns the rights to their games and CBS pays them $100's of millions a year to to broadcast them. Right now for the most part those games are being shown for free because the school just likes the fact they're on whatever media platform wants them. 

If the Jefferson County schools told all the media platforms "No, you can't broadcast our event without compensation" there's absolutely a local channel that would pay for the rights to show them. That channel would make significant add revenue, relative to high school sports, if that was the ONLY place you could see them.  

Texan Live paid Crosby ISD for the regular season rights. Any school that Texan Live streams during the regular season on a regular basis has negotiated a contract with TL. I know for a fact that East Chambers and Silsbee, two teams that TL streams all their home games plus some away games, signed contracts with Texan Live and got paid.

Playoff games are a different story. TL paid the UIL for those rights.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, AggiesAreWe said:

Texan Live paid Crosby ISD for the regular season rights. Any school that Texan Live streams during the regular season on a regular basis has negotiated a contract with TL. I know for a fact that East Chambers and Silsbee, two teams that TL streams all their home games plus some away games, signed contracts with Texan Live and got paid.

Playoff games are a different story. TL paid the UIL for those rights.

That's interesting. Whenever I asked one of our administrators last year why we still have to do so many fundraisers for basic necessities and just can't use the money we make from streams or home games to cover the expenses his exact answer to me was "The money is for all programs, not just football and we don't get bleep off of those streams." I was particularly asking because our game with FB Marshall was on our local CW station. Maybe he meant not getting anything as in a low dollar value but my impression was that he meant we don't get anything at all.

You can also watch Crosby's games on the NFHS network along with thousands of other schools, tough to see how a steaming service that can't even get a good feed all the time can pay 1,000's of high schools across the country for the rights to show their games or maybe they just pay the equivalent to the UIL in each one of those states? Either way, what I was pointing out is that if Crosby or district 8-5A-D1 solely owned those rights they could be sold for a lot more than they're receiving now. I'm sure to be a member of the UIL schools have to give up a certain level of autonomy though. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Silsbee92 said:

Back on topic for a sec..

No exact #s but word I got was about the same from last year ~100 players 

Silsbee Senior Class is bulk of Varsity w/ about 30+ Freshman.

I saw a team pic of the varsity earlier this week. Had 45 in the pic. That number will probably reduce by 8 or so by week 1.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At the parent meeting today Coach Willis said we only have about 125 kids in the entire program. Said for comparison at Colleyville Heritage he had about 185. Crosby like a lot of other schools is having to adjust to the largest population in their enrollment basically not even participating in football. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,201
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    JBarry68
    Newest Member
    JBarry68
    Joined


  • Posts

    • Very close game until the 2nd half (mostly the 4th) when Orangefield came unraveled. Worse defensive effort I have seen out of the Bobcats in three years. This team has to get back on D and quit getting beat over the top when pressing. Offensively, non ball handlers continually turn it over and their shot selection is poor. Basic basketball, such as: defensive hustle, boxing out, and taking care of the basketball are the areas the Bobcats need to work on most. Whitmire will get them on point, but he shouldn't have to coach effort at the Varsity Level. 
    • I don’t benefit from it, that’s not my area.  But the average cost to imprison someone is around $15k per year (on average in the US) and capital cases cost somewhere between $1.5-$3M with over half being overturned or reduced to life in prison anyway.  These numbers may be inflated since the last report I read but I’m sure it would be on both sides and higher on the DP side if anything. So what’s the point?  We feel better because we got to return the favor on someone (hopefully) who committed a heinous crime?  And I don’t know I can say we have “complicated” it. Which appeal should we cut out?  Our justice system has a pecking order and we have higher courts for a reason. When we are about to impose the ultimate judgment, should we cut steps that other cases have to save a buck?  Or do we not pay for an indigent person’s experts at the trial court level because it’s too expensive? Or do we just lock them up and throw away the key (unless we later find out they weren’t actually guilty, in which case we have a key and a life we haven’t unjustly ended) and save a ton of money?  Seems to me to be an easy and obvious solution but I’m more of a pragmatist.
    • 1 thing for certain. Coach Earned 3 more years to figure it out lol
    • @CIS_org National Security Senior Fellow @BensmanTodd tells Steve Bannon how the U.S. State Department and USAID have been sending American taxpayer funds to religious nonprofits to facilitate mass immigration to our southern border. Bensman says 248 nonprofits are participating in the United Nations’ 2024 agenda to distribute $1.6 billion in cash, transportation, food, and shelter to U.S.-bound immigrants across Mexico and Latin America.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...