Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

If anyone doesn’t know, Dershowitz is a fairly hardcore Democrat. A Harvard law professor, he supported Hillary Clinton and Barak Obama. He is in most accounts, a well respected attorney.

 This is his take on the indictment after reading it.

 The prosecutor lied on the indictment by omission and could be indicted… but won’t be. Part of the indictment was a statement by Trump which clearly puts his comment in the protection of the First Amendment and free speech. So the prosecutor who signed the affidavit under oath, altered Trump’s statement to make it look different. The prosecutor in the indictment left out where Trump said for the people to protest “peacefully and patriotically” but the prosecutor altered the statement by omitting those key words.

The video is about 30 minutes long but watch as least the first 3.5-4 minutes.

 

 

 

Posted

What the left sack of Nutz on this forum need to realize is The First Amendment doesn't just include a right to freedom of speech. It also includes a right to petition the government for redress of grievances. Now, Jack Smith wants to criminalize the act of contesting an election through the courts and by lobbying legislators. Every step of this indictment is a war on the Constitution.

Posted
4 hours ago, tvc184 said:

If anyone doesn’t know, Dershowitz is a fairly hardcore Democrat. A Harvard law professor, he supported Hillary Clinton and Barak Obama. He is in most accounts, a well respected attorney.

 This is his take on the indictment after reading it.

 The prosecutor lied on the indictment by omission and could be indicted… but won’t be. Part of the indictment was a statement by Trump which clearly puts his comment in the protection of the First Amendment and free speech. So the prosecutor who signed the affidavit under oath, altered Trump’s statement to make it look different. The prosecutor in the indictment left out where Trump said for the people to protest “peacefully and patriotically” but the prosecutor altered the statement by omitting those key words.

The video is about 30 minutes long but watch as least the first 3.5-4 minutes.

 

 

 

Proof that you can indict a ham sandwich. This is nothing more than political Lawfare to create election interference and politically bludgeon Trump during his presidential campaign. This sets a very dangerous precedent going forward if it is allowed to stand. This 💩 has been going on since 2015 an is just ridiculous but the crazy thing about it is the left Nutz on this site are too blind and ignorant to see it. When all is said in done Trump will end up suing everyone of the POS involved in this witch hunt an I don’t blame him. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,282
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    Unknown472929300
    Newest Member
    Unknown472929300
    Joined


×
×
  • Create New...