Jump to content

Alan Dershowitz on latest Trump indictment

tvc184

By tvc184
in Political Forum

 Share

Recommended Posts

tvc184

tvc184

Posted
Posted

If anyone doesn’t know, Dershowitz is a fairly hardcore Democrat. A Harvard law professor, he supported Hillary Clinton and Barak Obama. He is in most accounts, a well respected attorney.

 This is his take on the indictment after reading it.

 The prosecutor lied on the indictment by omission and could be indicted… but won’t be. Part of the indictment was a statement by Trump which clearly puts his comment in the protection of the First Amendment and free speech. So the prosecutor who signed the affidavit under oath, altered Trump’s statement to make it look different. The prosecutor in the indictment left out where Trump said for the people to protest “peacefully and patriotically” but the prosecutor altered the statement by omitting those key words.

The video is about 30 minutes long but watch as least the first 3.5-4 minutes.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Unwoke

Unwoke

Posted
Posted

What the left sack of Nutz on this forum need to realize is The First Amendment doesn't just include a right to freedom of speech. It also includes a right to petition the government for redress of grievances. Now, Jack Smith wants to criminalize the act of contesting an election through the courts and by lobbying legislators. Every step of this indictment is a war on the Constitution.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Unwoke

Unwoke

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, tvc184 said:

If anyone doesn’t know, Dershowitz is a fairly hardcore Democrat. A Harvard law professor, he supported Hillary Clinton and Barak Obama. He is in most accounts, a well respected attorney.

 This is his take on the indictment after reading it.

 The prosecutor lied on the indictment by omission and could be indicted… but won’t be. Part of the indictment was a statement by Trump which clearly puts his comment in the protection of the First Amendment and free speech. So the prosecutor who signed the affidavit under oath, altered Trump’s statement to make it look different. The prosecutor in the indictment left out where Trump said for the people to protest “peacefully and patriotically” but the prosecutor altered the statement by omitting those key words.

The video is about 30 minutes long but watch as least the first 3.5-4 minutes.

 

 

 

Proof that you can indict a ham sandwich. This is nothing more than political Lawfare to create election interference and politically bludgeon Trump during his presidential campaign. This sets a very dangerous precedent going forward if it is allowed to stand. This 💩 has been going on since 2015 an is just ridiculous but the crazy thing about it is the left Nutz on this site are too blind and ignorant to see it. When all is said in done Trump will end up suing everyone of the POS involved in this witch hunt an I don’t blame him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Member Statistics

    46,202
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    Aclark1510
    Newest Member
    Aclark1510
    Joined


  • Posts

    • Big girl
      Juicy Smollett conviction overturned by Illinois Supreme Court

      By Big girl · Posted

      Thanks for the explanation.
    • BOSoxfan4life
      To the Fans Who Complain About Referees

      By BOSoxfan4life · Posted

      Preach
    • Preach
      To the Fans Who Complain About Referees

      By Preach · Posted

      I get it!!  I was once in your shoes. I was that person in the stands, loudly complaining about “bad officiating.” Now, with the rise of social media, it’s easier than ever to voice these criticisms online.  I thought I could see every call better than the officials on the floor. Then someone said to me, “If you can do better, get in the game.”   That challenge changed my life. Over 20 years ago, I became a basketball official, and what I’ve learned since then is eye-opening.   Officiating is not just about making calls. It’s about managing the game, the players, the coaches, and yes, the fans. We face a new generation of student-athletes who have been raised in a culture where everyone gets a trophy and losing is almost taboo. We deal with fans who question our integrity and sometimes become outright hostile.   I acknowledge that officials aren’t perfect; we have off days just like anyone else. However, the increasing hostility from fans is driving many to leave officiating. According to the National Federation of High School Associations, approximately 50,000 high school officials have left the profession since the 2018-19 season, with fan behavior being a significant factor.    Here’s the reality: without officials, there is no game.   So, instead of tearing down the people who make your games possible, here’s a suggestion:   • Thank the officials for being part of the game. • Thank them for the countless hours they spend studying rules, mastering mechanics, and working to improve. • Thank them for their patience with privilege-minded athletes and overly aggressive fans.   Next time you see an official, instead of criticizing, take a moment to say, “Thank you.” They’re out there to make the game happen, and trust me, it’s not as easy as it looks from the stands.   If you think you can do better, take the challenge like I did. Get in the game. You might just discover how much it takes to blow that whistle.
    • AggiesAreWe
      *LATEXO TOURNAMENT THREAD*/Post updates here

      By AggiesAreWe · Posted

      Friday schedule: 9:20am             Neches vs. Corrigan (last pool game)   Bronze bracket 12pm          New Waverly vs. Warren 2:40pm       Alpha Omega vs. Neches/Corrigan loser (OG) Silver Bracket 2:40pm       Slocum vs. Normangee  (NG) 5:20pm        Kennard vs. Neches/Corrigan winner (OG) Gold Bracket 1:20pm        Alto vs. Trinity 5:20pm        Onalaska vs. Latexo  (NG)    
    • mat
      Susan Smith

      By mat · Posted

      So you’re saying we need to reform our appeal process?🤔

  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...