Jump to content

After a Five-Month Investigation, Texas Special Prosecutors Can’t Locate Evidence of Ken Paxton’s Alleged Bribery!


Reagan

Recommended Posts

From the article:  "“After an investigation spanning five months in both the Texas House of Representatives and the Texas Senate, interviewing over a dozen witnesses and reviewing almost 300,000 pages of documents, the two special prosecutors who were handed a blank check at taxpayers’ expense to find Ken Paxton’s bribe can’t locate one- because it never happened."

This is the hidden content, please

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Reagan said:

From the article:  "“After an investigation spanning five months in both the Texas House of Representatives and the Texas Senate, interviewing over a dozen witnesses and reviewing almost 300,000 pages of documents, the two special prosecutors who were handed a blank check at taxpayers’ expense to find Ken Paxton’s bribe can’t locate one- because it never happened."

This is the hidden content, please

What the freak do you expect Paxton’s lawyer to say?

 

18 hours ago, Reagan said:

From the article:  "“After an investigation spanning five months in both the Texas House of Representatives and the Texas Senate, interviewing over a dozen witnesses and reviewing almost 300,000 pages of documents, the two special prosecutors who were handed a blank check at taxpayers’ expense to find Ken Paxton’s bribe can’t locate one- because it never happened."

This is the hidden content, please

Here’s more:  

This is the hidden content, please

“You want evidence?”, the managers say. “Here’s 4,000 pages in advance of discovery.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Amongst the evidence released:

  • An interview with Paxton’s former personal aide who said he ferried documents to Paul on Paxton’s behalf and witnessed conversations about the renovations to Paxton’s home that suggested Paul had paid for it.
  • Emails showing how Paul and his lawyer directed a special prosecutor authorized by Paxton to investigate Paul’s business rivals and law enforcement officials that had raided his home.
  • Memoranda documenting numerous instances where Paxton’s senior advisers unsuccessfully urged him to cut ties with Paul, whom they suspected was a liar and criminal.
  • Trip records obtained from Uber showing an account Paul created under the alias “Dave P” which Paxton used to travel to the home of Paul and the apartment of the woman with whom the attorney general was having an extramarital affair.
  • An employment contract proving Paul hired Paxton’s mistress to work at his business.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, bullets13 said:

Amongst the evidence released:

  • An interview with Paxton’s former personal aide who said he ferried documents to Paul on Paxton’s behalf and witnessed conversations about the renovations to Paxton’s home that suggested Paul had paid for it.
  • Emails showing how Paul and his lawyer directed a special prosecutor authorized by Paxton to investigate Paul’s business rivals and law enforcement officials that had raided his home.
  • Memoranda documenting numerous instances where Paxton’s senior advisers unsuccessfully urged him to cut ties with Paul, whom they suspected was a liar and criminal.
  • Trip records obtained from Uber showing an account Paul created under the alias “Dave P” which Paxton used to travel to the home of Paul and the apartment of the woman with whom the attorney general was having an extramarital affair.
  • An employment contract proving Paul hired Paxton’s mistress to work at his business.

But other than that what do you have? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Proof That the Bribery of AG Paxton Never Happened!  

From the article:  

"The impeachment trial of Ken Paxton gets more ridiculous each day. The hearsay accusations are being disproven one by one. So far, the prosecutors don’t have any evidence. The prosecutor brought this case with no evidence.

Mr. Paxton’s attorney destroys every so-called witness they have.

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton’s personal assistant, Drew Wicker, alleged that Texas donor Nate Paul funded a kitchen remodel for Paxton for political influence.

During cross-examination, Drew Wicker admitted the kitchen remodel never took place.

Paxton’s attorney, Tony Buzbee, showed Drew Wicker pictures of the kitchen taken three years ago and some taken last month.  There was never any remodeling work completed, which is the central point of the alleged bribery."

This is the hidden content, please

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,206
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    Ceb2000
    Newest Member
    Ceb2000
    Joined


×
×
  • Create New...