UT alum Posted August 28, 2023 Report Posted August 28, 2023 I been telling ya’ll, Meadows will be the key to Trump’s cell. Now he’s gonna sing like a bird for Fani. This time he’s got his own fannie on the line. I don’t think he’ll send himself up to save Trump. Quote
Reagan Posted August 28, 2023 Report Posted August 28, 2023 Benjamin Franklin: "Freedom of speech is a principle pillar of a free government; when this support is taken away, the constitution of a free society is dissolved, and tyranny is erected on its ruins." What you have here in these cases are two different things. One is the freedom of speech. And, with the Georgia case, the criminalization of the practice of law. Nothing in any of these cases have been illegal. In Georgia, they indicted Trump and all of his lawyers. It's not going anywhere. They just needed a photo op which is backfiring on them. Now I hear that the judge for the Washington, DC case has set the trial date for March 4, 2024. Guess what date Super Tuesday is???? March 5, 2024. Talk about more evidence of collusion on the other side!! @Big girl @UT alum @DonTheCon2024 Quote
LumRaiderFan Posted August 28, 2023 Report Posted August 28, 2023 1 hour ago, UT alum said: I been telling ya’ll, Meadows will be the key to Trump’s cell. Now he’s gonna sing like a bird for Fani. This time he’s got his own fannie on the line. I don’t think he’ll send himself up to save Trump. WE GOT HIM THIS TIME!!!!!!! 🤞🤞🤞🤞🤞🤞🤞🤞🤞 lol Quote
DonTheCon2024 Posted August 28, 2023 Report Posted August 28, 2023 RED WAVE 2024 I WAS KIDDING THE LAST 2 ELECTIONS BUT I MEAN IT THIS TIME Quote
Big girl Posted August 29, 2023 Report Posted August 29, 2023 46 minutes ago, DonTheCon2024 said: RED WAVE 2024 I WAS KIDDING THE LAST 2 ELECTIONS BUT I MEAN IT THIS TIME Lol Quote
5GallonBucket Posted August 29, 2023 Report Posted August 29, 2023 3 hours ago, DonTheCon2024 said: RED WAVE 2024 I WAS KIDDING THE LAST 2 ELECTIONS BUT I MEAN IT THIS TIME The country better hope so Reagan 1 Quote
UT alum Posted August 29, 2023 Author Report Posted August 29, 2023 20 hours ago, Reagan said: Benjamin Franklin: "Freedom of speech is a principle pillar of a free government; when this support is taken away, the constitution of a free society is dissolved, and tyranny is erected on its ruins." What you have here in these cases are two different things. One is the freedom of speech. And, with the Georgia case, the criminalization of the practice of law. Nothing in any of these cases have been illegal. In Georgia, they indicted Trump and all of his lawyers. It's not going anywhere. They just needed a photo op which is backfiring on them. Now I hear that the judge for the Washington, DC case has set the trial date for March 4, 2024. Guess what date Super Tuesday is???? March 5, 2024. Talk about more evidence of collusion on the other side!! @Big girl @UT alum @DonTheCon2024 What’s your definition of free speech? Quote
Reagan Posted September 1, 2023 Report Posted September 1, 2023 On 8/29/2023 at 12:39 PM, UT alum said: What’s your definition of free speech? Freedom of speech is in the Constitution. Now, is it absolute? Of course not. Unless it's obvious, the burden of proof concerning whether or not free speech has been violated falls on the plaintiff. Yelling fire in a crowed theater is obvious not free speech. So, how is it separated? To not fall in the category of free speech, there has to be proven ill intent and malice. Yelling fire easily falls into this category. But, when it's not obvious, how do you know what's in the head of the accused? Like Trump and him being indicted for saying the 2020 election was rigged. The malice part would be Trump believed 100% that the election was not rigged and went and tried to forcefully stop the transfer of power. But there's no doubt he feels it was 100% rigged so there's no malice in what he's done. And talking about alternate electors is all legal. I believe Hillary did the same thing. Oh, and BTW -- didn't AlGore challenge the 2000 election? It got so stupid with the hanging chads and pregnant chads that the Supreme Court had to eventually step in and stop it. But, yes, he had to the to challenge if he wanted to. It just went to far. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.