adminbaberuth Posted November 23, 2007 Report Posted November 23, 2007 Last week Calprep was 9-0 which isn’t saying much as all our teams were pretty much favored: This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up WB 42 South Houston 28 (CP) picked WB 38 South Houston 19This week CP has WB 31 Fort Bend 30PNG 33 Galena Park 0 (CP) picked PNG 28 Galena Park 7This week CP has Lamar Consolidated 28 PNG 19Dayton 49 Crosby 7 (CP) picked Dayton 38 Crosby 10This week CP has Dayton 26 Texas City 14Lumberton 35 Smiley 7 (CP) picked Lum 41 Smiley 12This week CP has LaMarque 22 Lumberton 21WOS 51 Coldsprings 14 (CP) picked WOS 41 Coldsprings 14This week CP has Giddings 21 WOS 17Kirbyville 24 Cleveland 14 (CP) picked Kirbyville 35 Cleveland 8This week CP has Caldwell 40 Kirbyville 26Jasper 49 Splendora 14 (CP) picked Jasper 35 Splendora 14This week CP has Navasota 31 Jasper 21Newton 55 Buna 10 (CP) picked Newton 40 Buna 20This week CP has Newton 35 Mc Gregor 21Hardin 51 Hemphill 28 (CP) picked Hardin 35 Hemphill 28This week CP ha Crawford 35 Hardin 21
82 5A State Champs Posted November 23, 2007 Report Posted November 23, 2007 hmmmmmm.....interesting! I'd take a 31-30 win. it only takes one to win, and a "W" is a "W"!
stangchain Posted November 23, 2007 Report Posted November 23, 2007 You think that computer has watched any games this year?
NedDog Posted November 23, 2007 Report Posted November 23, 2007 I would bet the computer is basing that prediction on Giddings having Fitz at QB (at 100%). With that not being the case, WOS will roll. Go Stangs!
adminbaberuth Posted November 23, 2007 Author Report Posted November 23, 2007 Last week Calprep was 9-0 which isn’t saying much as all our teams were pretty much favored: This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up WB 42 South Houston 28 (CP) picked WB 38 South Houston 19This week CP has WB 31 Fort Bend 30PNG 33 Galena Park 0 (CP) picked PNG 28 Galena Park 7This week CP has Lamar Consolidated 28 PNG 19Dayton 49 Crosby 7 (CP) picked Dayton 38 Crosby 10This week CP has Dayton 26 Texas City 14Lumberton 35 Smiley 7 (CP) picked Lum 41 Smiley 12This week CP has LaMarque 22 Lumberton 21WOS 51 Coldsprings 14 (CP) picked WOS 41 Coldsprings 14This week CP has Giddings 21 WOS 17Kirbyville 24 Cleveland 14 (CP) picked Kirbyville 35 Cleveland 8This week CP has Caldwell 40 Kirbyville 26Jasper 49 Splendora 14 (CP) picked Jasper 35 Splendora 14This week CP has Navasota 31 Jasper 21Newton 55 Buna 10 (CP) picked Newton 40 Buna 20This week CP has Newton 35 Mc Gregor 21Hardin 51 Hemphill 28 (CP) picked Hardin 35 Hemphill 28This week CP ha Crawford 35 Hardin 21FinalsCrawford 35 Hardin 15Newton 35 Mc Gregor 14
PNG Proud Posted November 23, 2007 Report Posted November 23, 2007 Pretty smart computer...I gotta get me one of those!
Mr. Buddy Garrity Posted November 23, 2007 Report Posted November 23, 2007 FinalsCrawford 35 Hardin 15Newton 35 Mc Gregor 14 hey what does it say for stephenville and Rider?
adminbaberuth Posted November 23, 2007 Author Report Posted November 23, 2007 Rider 31 Stephenville 28
Mr. Buddy Garrity Posted November 23, 2007 Report Posted November 23, 2007 Rider 31 Stephenville 28YES! ROHO!!! ;D
adminbaberuth Posted November 24, 2007 Author Report Posted November 24, 2007 FinalsNavasota 42 Jasper 40Crawford 35 Hardin 15Newton 35 Mc Gregor 14WOS 28 Giddings 19Dayton 42 Texas City 10
BigWolf10 Posted November 24, 2007 Report Posted November 24, 2007 So much for that computer huh? The stangs are defying the odds.
Guest BIG HOUSE Posted November 24, 2007 Report Posted November 24, 2007 COMPUTER can't measure HEART.......L-TRAIN STILL ROLLING ;D ;D ;D
adminbaberuth Posted November 25, 2007 Author Report Posted November 25, 2007 Last Week- Calprep was 5-4Dayton-42 Texas City-10CP- Dayton 26 Texas city 14Lumberton-24 LaMarque-21CP- LaMarque 22 Lumberton 21WO-S-28 Giddings-19CP- Giddings 21 WOS17Navasota-42 Jasper-40CP- Navasota 31 Jasper 21Newton-35 McGregor-14CP- Newton 35 McGregor 21Crawford-35 Hardin-15CP- Crawford 35 Hardin 21Clements-36 West Brook-33CP-Westbrook 31 Fort Bend 30Lamar Consolidated-26 PN-G-7CP- Lamar Cons 28 PNG 19Kirbyville-49 Caldwell-28CP- Caldwell 40 Kirbyville 26This Week Calprep hasDayton 34 Livingston 14Lumberton 21 Waller 22 WO-S 21 Waco La Vega 28Kirbyville 26 China Spring 31Newton 31 Tatum 27
24 over par Posted November 25, 2007 Report Posted November 25, 2007 hope the computer is 2-3 this week and all 5 local teams advance
raiders4 Posted November 25, 2007 Report Posted November 25, 2007 Watch out the L train can't be stopped
Guest maverick24 Posted November 25, 2007 Report Posted November 25, 2007 Let me geuss the PC says Raidernation is too slow, Played a weak Pre-District Schedule and Waller has that tradition and playoff experience STUFF. Do you think if the LM (crybabies) would have won that waller would have been picked?? NO!! HEY PC we have a Generator on board so go ahead and get on the L-Train you will look much Smarter!
MrUmp1 Posted November 25, 2007 Report Posted November 25, 2007 Where do these computer picks come from? I went to calprep.com and did not see anything like this. Someone help this old blind ump out.
Bobcatfan4life Posted November 25, 2007 Report Posted November 25, 2007 http://www.calpreps.com/cgi-bin/2007/project_matchup.pl
newtonkicker112004 Posted November 25, 2007 Report Posted November 25, 2007 well according to the projection and it hanst been wrong much newton can throw tha duce as they ride byeNewton41tatum31
newtonkicker112004 Posted November 25, 2007 Report Posted November 25, 2007 mrump int ther red text click the word here find your state (texas) scroll to find date of game then click on the blue text(ex 2a- playoff) it will bring up a bracket type screen with matchups and projections
daytonbronco555 Posted November 26, 2007 Report Posted November 26, 2007 Last Week- Calprep was 5-4Dayton-42 Texas City-10CP- Dayton 26 Texas city 14Lumberton-24 LaMarque-21CP- LaMarque 22 Lumberton 21WO-S-28 Giddings-19CP- Giddings 21 WOS17Navasota-42 Jasper-40CP- Navasota 31 Jasper 21Newton-35 McGregor-14CP- Newton 35 McGregor 21Crawford-35 Hardin-15CP- Crawford 35 Hardin 21Clements-36 West Brook-33CP-Westbrook 31 Fort Bend 30Lamar Consolidated-26 PN-G-7CP- Lamar Cons 28 PNG 19Kirbyville-49 Caldwell-28CP- Caldwell 40 Kirbyville 26This Week Calprep hasDayton 34 Livingston 14Lumberton 21 Waller 22 WO-S 21 Waco La Vega 28Kirbyville 26 China Spring 31Newton 31 Tatum 27i take it that the computer isnt much of a lumberton fan
raideroldtimer Posted November 26, 2007 Report Posted November 26, 2007 You know Calpreps is a pretty handy tool, only one problem, it can't factor in heart and determination, that's why last week it only had a 5 out of 9 prediction rate. Hook that computer up to an L-Train heart and see it explode.....lol
adminbaberuth Posted December 3, 2007 Author Report Posted December 3, 2007 Last Week- Calprep was 5-4Dayton-42 Texas City-10CP- Dayton 26 Texas city 14Lumberton-24 LaMarque-21CP- LaMarque 22 Lumberton 21WO-S-28 Giddings-19CP- Giddings 21 WOS17Navasota-42 Jasper-40CP- Navasota 31 Jasper 21Newton-35 McGregor-14CP- Newton 35 McGregor 21Crawford-35 Hardin-15CP- Crawford 35 Hardin 21Clements-36 West Brook-33CP-Westbrook 31 Fort Bend 30Lamar Consolidated-26 PN-G-7CP- Lamar Cons 28 PNG 19Kirbyville-49 Caldwell-28CP- Caldwell 40 Kirbyville 26This Week Calprep hasDayton 34 Livingston 14Lumberton 21 Waller 22 WO-S 21 Waco La Vega 28Kirbyville 26 China Spring 31Newton 31 Tatum 27Calprep went 3-2This week Dayton 28 Waller 19
Englebert Posted December 3, 2007 Report Posted December 3, 2007 It flat out amazes me how someone can add the word computer to their "pick" and have many people think that some kind of science or superior intelligence is involved. The fact of the matter is that computer formulas are "tweaked" or modified every week to get the results the programer wants, which makes them no better than two drunks in a bar debating the next state champion (doesn't matter what week of the season). There are an infinite number of factors that decides who wins a game. The human brain is far superior on some factors, the computer is lightning speed faster on other factors. It is still a guessing game. We are not even a millionith of a fraction of being able to write a computer code that can accurately predict the outcome of a football game.Just like the BCS computer rankings, so-called gurus try to give credibility to their computer rankings, but refuse to publish their code. They claim to not publish their code for fear that someone will steal their ideas, but the truth is they refuse to publish it because it would get shredded in any public debate by the most unintelligent arm-chair quarterbacks.I dare anyone who thinks they have a "good" computer program for predicting football scores (or any sport for that matter) to wrap their code in an application or executable and publish it before the season starts (I promise not to disassemble it). Then we can see how an unmodified code will work. I will say with a 100% confidence that the code will be no better than .600, but probably under .500. That's about the same odds I would give to any person that has an IQ over 80.
Recommended Posts