Jump to content

Computer Picks


Recommended Posts

Last week Calprep was 9-0 which isn’t saying  much as all our teams were pretty much favored:

This is the hidden content, please

WB 42 South Houston 28    (CP) picked WB 38 South Houston  19

This week CP has WB 31 Fort Bend 30

PNG 33 Galena Park 0    (CP) picked  PNG 28 Galena Park 7

This week CP has Lamar Consolidated 28 PNG 19

Dayton 49 Crosby 7  (CP) picked Dayton 38 Crosby 10

This week CP has Dayton 26 Texas City 14

Lumberton 35 Smiley 7  (CP) picked Lum 41 Smiley 12

This week CP has LaMarque 22 Lumberton 21

WOS 51 Coldsprings 14  (CP) picked WOS 41 Coldsprings 14

This week CP has Giddings 21 WOS 17

Kirbyville 24 Cleveland 14  (CP) picked Kirbyville 35 Cleveland 8

This week CP has Caldwell 40 Kirbyville 26

Jasper 49 Splendora 14  (CP) picked Jasper 35 Splendora 14

This week CP has Navasota 31 Jasper 21

Newton 55 Buna 10  (CP) picked Newton 40 Buna 20

This week CP has Newton 35 Mc Gregor 21

Hardin 51 Hemphill 28  (CP) picked Hardin 35 Hemphill 28

This week CP ha Crawford 35 Hardin 21

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Last week Calprep was 9-0 which isn’t saying  much as all our teams were pretty much favored:

This is the hidden content, please

WB 42 South Houston 28    (CP) picked WB 38 South Houston  19

This week CP has WB 31 Fort Bend 30

PNG 33 Galena Park 0     (CP) picked  PNG 28 Galena Park 7

This week CP has Lamar Consolidated 28 PNG 19

Dayton 49 Crosby 7   (CP) picked Dayton 38 Crosby 10

This week CP has Dayton 26 Texas City 14

Lumberton 35 Smiley 7  (CP) picked Lum 41 Smiley 12

This week CP has LaMarque 22 Lumberton 21

WOS 51 Coldsprings 14  (CP) picked WOS 41 Coldsprings 14

This week CP has Giddings 21 WOS 17

Kirbyville 24 Cleveland 14  (CP) picked Kirbyville 35 Cleveland 8

This week CP has Caldwell 40 Kirbyville 26

Jasper 49 Splendora 14  (CP) picked Jasper 35 Splendora 14

This week CP has Navasota 31 Jasper 21

Newton 55 Buna 10  (CP) picked Newton 40 Buna 20

This week CP has Newton 35 Mc Gregor 21

Hardin 51 Hemphill 28  (CP) picked Hardin 35 Hemphill 28

This week CP ha Crawford 35 Hardin 21

Finals

Crawford 35 Hardin 15

Newton 35 Mc Gregor 14

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Last Week- Calprep was 5-4

Dayton-42 Texas City-10

CP- Dayton 26 Texas city 14

Lumberton-24 LaMarque-21

CP- LaMarque 22 Lumberton 21

WO-S-28 Giddings-19

CP- Giddings 21 WOS17

Navasota-42 Jasper-40

CP- Navasota 31 Jasper 21

Newton-35 McGregor-14

CP- Newton 35 McGregor 21

Crawford-35 Hardin-15

CP- Crawford 35 Hardin 21

Clements-36 West Brook-33

CP-Westbrook 31 Fort Bend 30

Lamar Consolidated-26 PN-G-7

CP- Lamar Cons 28 PNG 19

Kirbyville-49 Caldwell-28

CP- Caldwell 40 Kirbyville 26

This Week Calprep has

Dayton 34  Livingston 14

Lumberton 21 Waller 22

WO-S 21  Waco La Vega 28

Kirbyville 26  China Spring 31

Newton 31 Tatum 27

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest maverick24

Let me geuss the PC says  Raidernation is too slow, Played a weak Pre-District Schedule and Waller has that tradition and playoff experience STUFF. Do you think if the LM (crybabies) would have won that waller would have been picked?? NO!! HEY PC we have a Generator on board so go ahead and get on the L-Train you will look much Smarter!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Last Week- Calprep was 5-4

Dayton-42 Texas City-10

CP- Dayton 26 Texas city 14

Lumberton-24 LaMarque-21

CP- LaMarque 22 Lumberton 21

WO-S-28 Giddings-19

CP- Giddings 21 WOS17

Navasota-42 Jasper-40

CP- Navasota 31 Jasper 21

Newton-35 McGregor-14

CP- Newton 35 McGregor 21

Crawford-35 Hardin-15

CP- Crawford 35 Hardin 21

Clements-36 West Brook-33

CP-Westbrook 31 Fort Bend 30

Lamar Consolidated-26 PN-G-7

CP- Lamar Cons 28 PNG 19

Kirbyville-49 Caldwell-28

CP- Caldwell 40 Kirbyville 26

This Week Calprep has

Dayton 34  Livingston 14

Lumberton 21 Waller 22

WO-S 21  Waco La Vega 28

Kirbyville 26  China Spring 31

Newton 31 Tatum 27

i take it that the computer isnt much of a lumberton fan

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Last Week- Calprep was 5-4

Dayton-42 Texas City-10

CP- Dayton 26 Texas city 14

Lumberton-24 LaMarque-21

CP- LaMarque 22 Lumberton 21

WO-S-28 Giddings-19

CP- Giddings 21 WOS17

Navasota-42 Jasper-40

CP- Navasota 31 Jasper 21

Newton-35 McGregor-14

CP- Newton 35 McGregor 21

Crawford-35 Hardin-15

CP- Crawford 35 Hardin 21

Clements-36 West Brook-33

CP-Westbrook 31 Fort Bend 30

Lamar Consolidated-26 PN-G-7

CP- Lamar Cons 28 PNG 19

Kirbyville-49 Caldwell-28

CP- Caldwell 40 Kirbyville 26

This Week Calprep has

Dayton 34  Livingston 14

Lumberton 21 Waller 22

WO-S 21  Waco La Vega 28

Kirbyville 26  China Spring 31

Newton 31 Tatum 27

Calprep went 3-2

This week Dayton 28 Waller 19

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It flat out amazes me how someone can add the word computer to their "pick" and have many people think that some kind of science or superior intelligence is involved. The fact of the matter is that computer formulas are "tweaked" or modified every week to get the results the programer wants, which makes them no better than two drunks in a bar debating the next state champion (doesn't matter what week of the season). There are an infinite number of factors that decides who wins a game. The human brain is far superior on some factors, the computer is lightning speed faster on other factors. It is still a guessing game. We are not even a millionith of a fraction of being able to write a computer code that can accurately predict the outcome of a football game.

Just like the BCS computer rankings, so-called gurus try to give credibility to their computer rankings, but refuse to publish their code. They claim to not publish their code for fear that someone will steal their ideas, but the truth is they refuse to publish it because it would get shredded in any public debate by the most unintelligent arm-chair quarterbacks.

I dare anyone who thinks they have a "good" computer program for predicting football scores (or any sport for that matter) to wrap their code in an application or executable and publish it before the season starts (I promise not to disassemble it). Then we can see how an unmodified code will work. I will say with a 100% confidence that the code will be no better than .600, but probably under .500. That's about the same odds I would give to any person that has an IQ over 80.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member Statistics

    46,207
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    JBarry68
    Newest Member
    JBarry68
    Joined


×
×
  • Create New...