mat Posted November 1, 2023 Report Posted November 1, 2023 They indict Trump, all his lawyers and others. Then they offer immunity to all but one. The agenda is clear. Justice is not the goal. Quote
5GallonBucket Posted November 1, 2023 Report Posted November 1, 2023 9 hours ago, UT alum said: Nobody’s scared of a second rate two bit criminal. That kind of a morally bankrupt individual should not be leading or anywhere near any leadership position in the greatest democracy on earth. Go ahead and give the stock reply, trumpers. NO ONE NEEDS IMMUNITY IF NOTHING WRONG HAS BEEN DONE OR WITNESSED. Can that just not penetrate your mind? Your so stuck on Trump that it’s sad and pathetic. this is so much more than about Trump. your own description fits most of a certain party that you support. Quote
UT alum Posted November 1, 2023 Author Report Posted November 1, 2023 3 hours ago, 5GallonBucket said: Your so stuck on Trump that it’s sad and pathetic. this is so much more than about Trump. your own description fits most of a certain party that you support. Did you pass American history? Quote
5GallonBucket Posted November 2, 2023 Report Posted November 2, 2023 20 hours ago, UT alum said: Did you pass American history? Sure did, did you? You used the word Morals not me. Quote
Separation Scientist Posted November 2, 2023 Report Posted November 2, 2023 Biden, Schumer, Pelosi, etc. will all be facing the real JUDGE in the not too distant future, given their age. Those who support them and what they stand for and do will follow at some point. Tic toc, tic toc, tic toc… Chester86, Reagan and baddog 2 1 Quote
baddog Posted November 2, 2023 Report Posted November 2, 2023 21 hours ago, UT alum said: Did you pass American history? Not a requirement today. Today’s high schoolers and college grads can’t even tell you who fought in the American Revolution. All of us 3R people passed American history. Quote
EAGLEFOREVER Posted November 13, 2023 Report Posted November 13, 2023 On 10/30/2023 at 10:47 PM, UT alum said: Meadows was offered immunity for testimony in documents case and January 6 case. Are you saying that is fake reporting? Meadows was held in contempt of Congress for ignoring a supbpoena to testify in the second impeachment trial. Are you saying that is a lie? If there was nothing to turn on, why would he, or any other witness but especially he - the closest person to him on a day to day basis by job description - need immunity? That’s not fake news. That’s what they call logic. I’m not relying on anyone else’s opinion. I’m taking facts recorded in the public record and drawing my own conclusions. You oughtta try it. It’s a lot more productive than listening to someone else tell me whatvthey think about it. I can think for myself. At the end of the day, I’ll be proved either right or wrong. Who believes the media? I certainly don’t Chester86 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.