setxathlete14 Posted January 14 Report Posted January 14 43 minutes ago, CardinalBacker said: Not true. Most of ours never sign up… the ones who actually turn out are in it for the long haul. So you’re wrong again. Well time well tell. Bc just got their coach. Quote
SmashMouth Posted January 14 Report Posted January 14 On 1/13/2024 at 5:40 AM, navydawg31 said: Wrong. “Together, Beaumont, Port Arthur, and Orange form the Golden Triangle, a prominent industrial area on the Texas Gulf Coast…” -beaumonttexas.gov navydawg31 1 Quote
CardinalBacker Posted January 14 Report Posted January 14 1 hour ago, setxathlete14 said: Well time well tell. Bc just got their coach. I’m not in touch with the program much anymore, but I didn’t do a lot of cheering. Everybody knows that BC athletes are far superior to those that OF produces in every way, but we also play in a much tougher district. I don’t expect Smallley to have any better results in BC than he did at OF. Who knows? We might even finish as a four seed sometimes. I mean… if your district is populated by Silsbee, Jasper, HF, and WOS (the old WOS, anyways) you’d want to hire somebody capable of elevating the program to point where you’d be competitive, right? Or not. Quote
setxathlete14 Posted January 14 Report Posted January 14 6 minutes ago, CardinalBacker said: I’m not in touch with the program much anymore, but I didn’t do a lot of cheering. Everybody knows that BC athletes are far superior to those that OF produces in every way, but we also play in a much tougher district. I don’t expect Smallley to have any better results in BC than he did at OF. Who knows? We might even finish as a four seed sometimes. I mean… if your district is populated by Silsbee, Jasper, HF, and WOS (the old WOS, anyways) you’d want to hire somebody capable of elevating the program to point where you’d be competitive, right? Or not. BC will not be in the 4th seed while playing up. Even though they think it's an easier schedule. It will be the same outcomes I believe. Them opting up if true is a sign of weakness not strength Quote
setxathlete14 Posted January 14 Report Posted January 14 4 minutes ago, CardinalBacker said: I’m not in touch with the program much anymore, but I didn’t do a lot of cheering. Everybody knows that BC athletes are far superior to those that OF produces in every way, but we also play in a much tougher district. I don’t expect Smallley to have any better results in BC than he did at OF. Who knows? We might even finish as a four seed sometimes. I mean… if your district is populated by Silsbee, Jasper, HF, and WOS (the old WOS, anyways) you’d want to hire somebody capable of elevating the program to point where you’d be competitive, right? Or not. Care to elaborate? Because that's a hilarious assumption 🤣🤣🤣 Quote
AggiesAreWe Posted January 14 Report Posted January 14 6 minutes ago, CardinalBacker said: I’m not in touch with the program much anymore, but I didn’t do a lot of cheering. Everybody knows that BC athletes are far superior to those that OF produces in every way, but we also play in a much tougher district. I don’t expect Smallley to have any better results in BC than he did at OF. Who knows? We might even finish as a four seed sometimes. I mean… if your district is populated by Silsbee, Jasper, HF, and WOS (the old WOS, anyways) you’d want to hire somebody capable of elevating the program to point where you’d be competitive, right? Or not. But their district doesn't comprise of those teams. Since BC opted up, they play the likes of Lumberton, Vidor, Huffman, LC-M, HJ and Liberty. Quote
navydawg31 Posted January 14 Report Posted January 14 32 minutes ago, CardinalBacker said: I’m not in touch with the program much anymore, but I didn’t do a lot of cheering. Everybody knows that BC athletes are far superior to those that OF produces in every way, but we also play in a much tougher district. I don’t expect Smallley to have any better results in BC than he did at OF. Who knows? We might even finish as a four seed sometimes. I mean… if your district is populated by Silsbee, Jasper, HF, and WOS (the old WOS, anyways) you’d want to hire somebody capable of elevating the program to point where you’d be competitive, right? Or not. BC will not be playing HF, WOS, Jasper, or Silsbee in district play. Quote
setxathlete14 Posted January 14 Report Posted January 14 37 minutes ago, navydawg31 said: BC will not be playing HF, WOS, Jasper, or Silsbee in district play. And still won't be competing for any better placing in district. Quote
navydawg31 Posted January 14 Report Posted January 14 41 minutes ago, setxathlete14 said: And still won't be competing for any better placing in district. Well went from 0% chance to 25% chance imo lol but agreed Quote
CardinalBacker Posted January 14 Report Posted January 14 3 hours ago, AggiesAreWe said: But their district doesn't comprise of those teams. Since BC opted up, they play the likes of Lumberton, Vidor, Huffman, LC-M, HJ and Liberty. Can you verify that BC actually opted up? I’ve seen nothing official. And for what it’s worth, I’d rather get out-athleted in 4aD2 than laid on by fat white kids in that D1 district. Quote
AggiesAreWe Posted January 14 Report Posted January 14 12 minutes ago, CardinalBacker said: Can you verify that BC actually opted up? I’ve seen nothing official. And for what it’s worth, I’d rather get out-athleted in 4aD2 than laid on by fat white kids in that D1 district. They have opted up along with Hardin-Jefferson and Liberty. All mock realignments, including DCTF, have Bridge City in 4A DI. Quote
CardinalBacker Posted January 14 Report Posted January 14 1 hour ago, AggiesAreWe said: They have opted up along with Hardin-Jefferson and Liberty. All mock realignments, including DCTF, have Bridge City in 4A DI. I just don’t understand the thought process behind that decision. setxathlete14 1 Quote
TxHoops Posted January 14 Report Posted January 14 5 hours ago, CardinalBacker said: I’m not in touch with the program much anymore, but I didn’t do a lot of cheering. Everybody knows that BC athletes are far superior to those that OF produces in every way, but we also play in a much tougher district. I don’t expect Smallley to have any better results in BC than he did at OF. Who knows? We might even finish as a four seed sometimes. I mean… if your district is populated by Silsbee, Jasper, HF, and WOS (the old WOS, anyways) you’d want to hire somebody capable of elevating the program to point where you’d be competitive, right? Or not. Same gene pool, just much softer kids who appear to have breast fed inappropriately too long in BC… Back on topic, as long as the Bobcats don’t hire Mike McCarthy or Jimbo Fisher I will be happy. bullets13, QB1, Reagan and 2 others 1 4 Quote
setxathlete14 Posted January 14 Report Posted January 14 58 minutes ago, CardinalBacker said: I just don’t understand the thought process behind that decision. There's no logical reason in my opinion other than thinking it's easier competition in their minds Quote
bullets13 Posted January 15 Report Posted January 15 On 1/13/2024 at 10:05 AM, navydawg31 said: what school that runs the slot t won a ship this year? What offense turns Orangefield into a contender for a state championship? Quote
Reagan Posted January 15 Report Posted January 15 Just now, bullets13 said: What offense turns Orangefield into a contender for a state championship? My friend, it’s not the offense — it’s the coach. Ask the folks at PNG! navydawg31 1 Quote
89Falcon Posted January 15 Report Posted January 15 1 hour ago, bullets13 said: What offense turns Orangefield into a contender for a state championship? None, OF lacks players sufficient for winning a State Championship. SmashMouth and CS. 2 Quote
navydawg31 Posted January 15 Report Posted January 15 1 hour ago, bullets13 said: What offense turns Orangefield into a contender for a state championship? It’s the Coach not the offense scheme. If Orangefield is only putting out there we only want Slot T coaches here, that limits their coaches searches drastically Reagan 1 Quote
QB1 Posted January 15 Report Posted January 15 On 1/13/2024 at 1:06 AM, Reagan said: In your next post you listed 2 different offenses. Neither one was the Spread. So saying they don't have the personnel to run the spread is a little disingenuous. You can pass a lot out of the Pro-I. But did they? I'm not saying you are wrong or right. But think about this: What if since 2004 they had the Spread install and have been working with their kids in this offense since the 7th grade. Would it look totally different? Not sure. This is were good/great coaches start the QB development. But, this is me offering my opinion just like you offered yours. The kids that are in 8th, 9th, and 10th grade grew up throwing the ball, A LOT! We have QB development for several that go to private lessons and play 7 on 7. Of course the Slot T was sprinkled in there just to get them used to it, but they didn't start primarily running that until the 8th Grade. Even in 7th grade ball they threw it a lot. The pieces are there and not just for the next two or three years. They just need to be implemented or at least given an opportunity. Quote
setxathlete14 Posted January 15 Report Posted January 15 1 hour ago, QB1 said: The kids that are in 8th, 9th, and 10th grade grew up throwing the ball, A LOT! We have QB development for several that go to private lessons and play 7 on 7. Of course the Slot T was sprinkled in there just to get them used to it, but they didn't start primarily running that until the 8th Grade. Even in 7th grade ball they threw it a lot. The pieces are there and not just for the next two or three years. They just need to be implemented or at least given an opportunity. Maybe that's the problem. They should be running same stuff. I know peevy worked getting the same concepts for the kids all the way down to the peewee levels at lcm. That's important. Pretty sure WOS has always ran similar systems all the way down too. Quote
SmashMouth Posted January 15 Report Posted January 15 16 minutes ago, setxathlete14 said: Maybe that's the problem. They should be running same stuff. I know peevy worked getting the same concepts for the kids all the way down to the peewee levels at lcm. That's important. Pretty sure WOS has always ran similar systems all the way down too. Wouldn't matter if they were teaching the same system all the way back to the cradle. None of the 3 necessary components exist: coaches, kids & community. All are middle of the road... Quote
setxathlete14 Posted January 15 Report Posted January 15 1 hour ago, SmashMouth said: Wouldn't matter if they were teaching the same system all the way back to the cradle. None of the 3 necessary components exist: coaches, kids & community. All are middle of the road... Well maybe the new AD will come in and work to clear some of these discrepancies. SmashMouth 1 Quote
QB1 Posted January 15 Report Posted January 15 3 hours ago, SmashMouth said: Wouldn't matter if they were teaching the same system all the way back to the cradle. None of the 3 necessary components exist: coaches, kids & community. All are middle of the road... Tell us how you really feel... Quote
SmashMouth Posted January 15 Report Posted January 15 16 minutes ago, QB1 said: Tell us how you really feel... I wasn't being harsh. Just being honest. Do you disagree? Quote
SmashMouth Posted January 15 Report Posted January 15 17 minutes ago, QB1 said: Tell us how you really feel... The same applies for many schools in this area. Not just Orangefield... Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.