Jump to content

Jeffery Breaux named OF’s New AD


Gocats90

Recommended Posts

16 hours ago, Bobcats0809 said:

I still haven’t figured out why OF fans are in such a hurry to run the spread lol. There are lots of really bad teams running the spread, & we won a ton of games with the Slot T over really good programs. The Slot T fit our athletes well. Parents with very little football knowledge hate On the Slot T all the time, I’ve lived in OF for over 40 years, go look at some of the records we had before the Slot T, it wasn’t all sunshine and rainbows. I hope we go 10-0 next year but LCM hasn’t exactly been world beaters. I’m optimistic but I’m also realistic, and I feel the Slot T was very good for OF. 

It’s not the fact that Orangefield is wanting to run the Spread or hated the Wing-T (actually Orangefield ran 60% Power I) it’s the fact of the 95% run offense &  the predictable passing game. 
 

im hoping for a more balanced Offense NOT 95% Air Raid Not Wing T or slot T.
 

is asking for Balance that much of an issue to ole blood Orangefield people ?  
 

going .500 over 12 years may get you a “Ton” of Wins but Orangefield is Better than a 500 winning percentage. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Ty Cobb said:

You are correct on the years but Coach Smalley was the head coach.  Coach Huckaby's last year was the 2011 football season.

According to Maxpreps.. OF beat EC, Woodville, and Jasper in 2011.  And played Silsbee within 4.

I'm pretty sure Huckaby was a Slot-T guy if I remember correctly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, oldschool2 said:

According to Maxpreps.. OF beat EC, Woodville, and Jasper in 2011.  And played Silsbee within 4.

I'm pretty sure Huckaby was a Slot-T guy if I remember correctly.

Correct, look at before huckaby when it was Morrison with the spread 😂

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Bobcat101 said:

It’s not the fact that Orangefield is wanting to run the Spread or hated the Wing-T (actually Orangefield ran 60% Power I) it’s the fact of the 95% run offense &  the predictable passing game. 
 

im hoping for a more balanced Offense NOT 95% Air Raid Not Wing T or slot T.
 

is asking for Balance that much of an issue to ole blood Orangefield people ?  
 

going .500 over 12 years may get you a “Ton” of Wins but Orangefield is Better than a 500 winning percentage. 

I don’t know what you’re talking about, the spread isn’t really a balanced offense, I’d be all about a pro style power I system, but that ain’t happening. Orangefield turned things around BIG TIME, when we went to the slot T, again, just look at the records in the 90’s & 2000’s lol only a handful of winning seasons. I obviously hope we win every game, but hating on the Slot T makes zero sense because we were relatively successful with it, & we literally have no clue if we have their personnel that can effectively run the spread.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Bobcat101 said:

It’s not the fact that Orangefield is wanting to run the Spread or hated the Wing-T (actually Orangefield ran 60% Power I) it’s the fact of the 95% run offense &  the predictable passing game. 
 

im hoping for a more balanced Offense NOT 95% Air Raid Not Wing T or slot T.
 

is asking for Balance that much of an issue to ole blood Orangefield people ?  
 

going .500 over 12 years may get you a “Ton” of Wins but Orangefield is Better than a 500 winning percentage. 

I'm not sure about Orangefield running 60% Power I. I believe the switched back and forth between Slot T and Wing T (there is a difference).

The Slot-t is the south Texas version of the wing-t, where backs are much closer to LOS and they basically never pass. The wing-t is multiple and incorporates misdirection, option and attacks defense at all levels in the rushing and passing game and has motion.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Sports86 said:

I'm not sure about Orangefield running 60% Power I. I believe the switched back and forth between Slot T and Wing T (there is a difference).

The Slot-t is the south Texas version of the wing-t, where backs are much closer to LOS and they basically never pass. The wing-t is multiple and incorporates misdirection, option and attacks defense at all levels in the rushing and passing game and has motion.

 

That's why I like watching Texarkana Pleasant Grove offense. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Sports86 said:

I'm not sure about Orangefield running 60% Power I. I believe the switched back and forth between Slot T and Wing T (there is a difference).

The Slot-t is the south Texas version of the wing-t, where backs are much closer to LOS and they basically never pass. The wing-t is multiple and incorporates misdirection, option and attacks defense at all levels in the rushing and passing game and has motion.

 

🤣 hilarious

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Mr. Buddy Garrity said:

That's why I like watching Texarkana Pleasant Grove offense. 

Even they don’t really run the Wing T anymore I don’t think… People get bent outta shape about what system to run but if you have the jimmys and Joe’s what offense you run doesn’t necessarily matter for the most part IMO. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, BBfan061 said:

Even they don’t really run the Wing T anymore I don’t think… People get bent outta shape about what system to run but if you have the jimmys and Joe’s what offense you run doesn’t necessarily matter for the most part IMO. 

Going strictly by what their own HC said in an interview recently along with footage (I posted the article earlier last season after someone suggested they ran slot-T.) 🤷🏾‍♂️  

 

They had the kid that's going to Arkansas at QB and went more shotgun in the games I watched last season though. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, BBfan061 said:

Even they don’t really run the Wing T anymore I don’t think… People get bent outta shape about what system to run but if you have the jimmys and Joe’s what offense you run doesn’t necessarily matter for the most part IMO. 

It is pretty funny to listen to people talk about scheme and how important it is.

If you have the athletes, any scheme can be successful.

The key is not the scheme, but rather the ability to coach it, make adjustments and the ability of play callers. Every scheme has the ability to run the ball and the opportunity to throw it. Really, it is all about the ability and willingness to call the plays and when to call them. Plenty of pass plays in the wing-t and slot-t playbooks. Coaching matters, but if you don't have the DUDES......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, PlayActionPass said:

It is pretty funny to listen to people talk about scheme and how important it is.

If you have the athletes, any scheme can be successful.

The key is not the scheme, but rather the ability to coach it, make adjustments and the ability of play callers. Every scheme has the ability to run the ball and the opportunity to throw it. Really, it is all about the ability and willingness to call the plays and when to call them. Plenty of pass plays in the wing-t and slot-t playbooks. Coaching matters, but if you don't have the DUDES......

Don't let a certain Coaching Philosopher on here see this in bold, his head might blow its top 😂

Link to comment
Share on other sites

List of Applicants thru a Public Information Request with OISD

35 applicants total:

Jason Ferguson

Lawrence Ellison

William Brewton

Blake Schmidt

Quentin Cody Nelson

Brandon Prouse

Derek Hayes

Beau Blair

Josh Rankin

Marcial Chapa

Daryl Hobbs

James Norman

Mathew Loucks

Joseph Hood

Christopher Jones

Christopher Billings

Taran Hebert

Nathan Byerly

Jeremy Jenkins

James Moore

Henry Willis

Brandon Craus

Christopher Pachuca

Michael Malphrus

Bruce Munden

Danny Ramsey

Robert DeShazo

Christopher Maple

Shea Bolton

Ryan Jones

Robie Robbins

Mathew Pace

Jeff Breaux

Michael Trahan

Parker James

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,201
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    JBarry68
    Newest Member
    JBarry68
    Joined



  • Posts

    • naw, maaaaybe 7, definitely not 8 deep.  today im avoiding sitting by #10s parents, had to move away yesterday.   "put my son back in jub, put my son back in"  and then crying on every little touch of someone.    lets ball out today ktz!    
    • Very close game until the 2nd half (mostly the 4th) when Orangefield came unraveled. Worse defensive effort I have seen out of the Bobcats in three years. This team has to get back on D and quit getting beat over the top when pressing. Offensively, non ball handlers continually turn it over and their shot selection is poor. Basic basketball, such as: defensive hustle, boxing out, and taking care of the basketball are the areas the Bobcats need to work on most. Whitmire will get them on point, but he shouldn't have to coach effort at the Varsity Level.  We'll be at McNeese this Friday night at 6pm.
    • I don’t benefit from it, that’s not my area.  But the average cost to imprison someone is around $15k per year (on average in the US) and capital cases cost somewhere between $1.5-$3M with over half being overturned or reduced to life in prison anyway.  These numbers may be inflated since the last report I read but I’m sure it would be on both sides and higher on the DP side if anything. So what’s the point?  We feel better because we got to return the favor on someone (hopefully) who committed a heinous crime?  And I don’t know I can say we have “complicated” it. Which appeal should we cut out?  Our justice system has a pecking order and we have higher courts for a reason. When we are about to impose the ultimate judgment, should we cut steps that other cases have to save a buck?  Or do we not pay for an indigent person’s experts at the trial court level because it’s too expensive? Or do we just lock them up and throw away the key (unless we later find out they weren’t actually guilty, in which case we have a key and a life we haven’t unjustly ended) and save a ton of money?  Seems to me to be an obvious solution but I’m more of a pragmatist.
    • 1 thing for certain. Coach Earned 3 more years to figure it out lol
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...