Jump to content

Trump ordered to pay over 300 million

Big girl

By Big girl
in Political Forum

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 107
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

LumRaiderFan
LumRaiderFan

This is the hidden content, please Sign In or

LumRaiderFan
LumRaiderFan

He borrowed money from institutions that were happy to lend it to him and paid them all back.  It’s a shame we want to make a criminal of him and allow the deadbeats that stole money from the American

Separation Scientist
Separation Scientist

Its a political/financial assination of Trump. This is exactly what they do in places like Venesuela, Russia, Brazil. The USA is officially a Banana Republic. Just what you would expect from a George

Posted Images

Big girl

Big girl

Posted
  • Author
Posted
1 hour ago, LumRaiderFan said:

I agree with baddog, you don’t even know what this is about, all you see is Trump, must be guilty.

Not to worry, you have lots of folks just like you that have no interest in justice.

Read the article. I hope he has 355 million in cash

Link to comment
Share on other sites
baddog

baddog

Posted
Posted
5 hours ago, Big girl said:

Can you read

Well, I have to get help with some of your verbiage. Other than that, I read better than people with diplomas. I know what Trump was charged with in kangaroo court. I want to hear it from you. Like I said, you can’t put it in your own words. 
What did Trump do that was considered fraudulent?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Big girl

Big girl

Posted
  • Author
Posted
12 hours ago, baddog said:

Once again, BG has no explanation whatsoever. She doesn’t even know who Trump supposedly defrauded. Wouldn’t that be the banks? I saw no banks involved in this lawsuit. 
“There are none so blind as those who will not see.”

 The article clearly states who he defrauded. He inflated his net worth in order to obtain loans. Didn't he admit it? 

Trump and executives at his company, including his sons Donald Trump Jr. and Eric Trump, attempted to blame exaggerated financial statements that were the heart of New York Attorney General Letitia James’ fraud case on the accountants who compiled them. Engoron disagreed..Michael Cohen said that Trump told them to inflate the numbers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Big girl

Big girl

Posted
  • Author
Posted

This is the hidden content, please

Civil enforcement actions are routine for government officials in every U.S. state and local government, and for the federal government. Most kinds of white collar legal violations are predominantly enforced through civil enforcement rather than criminal charges, in part, because this is perceived as less harsh and because it affords the government a wider range of remedies

Link to comment
Share on other sites
baddog

baddog

Posted
Posted
46 minutes ago, Big girl said:

You are an idiot. The article clearly states who he defrauded. He inflated his net worth in order to obtain loans. Didn't he admit it? 

Trump and executives at his company, including his sons Donald Trump Jr. and Eric Trump, attempted to blame exaggerated financial statements that were the heart of New York Attorney General Letitia James’ fraud case on the accountants who compiled them. Engoron disagreed..Michael Cohen said that Trump told them to inflate the numbers.

That’s hearsay right there, and from Cohen the backstabber. You’ll follow anyone won’t you? You let me know when a bank is going to loan money on a property that appraises for less than the loan….. and I’m the idoit. People over value their homes in a daily basis. People sell cars daily for over blue book. 
Your fake diploma is showing your true colors and your brilliance. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LumRaiderFan

LumRaiderFan

Posted
Posted

This is the hidden content, please

I guess it's entertainment for the dopey Trump haters.

From the article:

This past week Judge Arthur Engoron of New York State Supreme Court, the lowest level of courts of general jurisdiction, levied a mammoth fine of some $370 million, including interest, against Donald Trump for purported fraud under a New York statute.  

The term fraud is used loosely since no one was defrauded, an element of a cause of action under common law fraud, and no one was harmed, also an element, and there was no proof of reliance, another element. This is fraud "in the air," as the saying goes: no harm by no one against no one for no loss by anyone.  

No one testified that they lost a penny from the purported fraud, or that they would not have wanted to deal with Trump as a customer. No one came forward to complain, except Attorney General Letitia James. But more about this modern-day Torquemada later in this column.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Big girl

Big girl

Posted
  • Author
Posted
25 minutes ago, baddog said:

That’s hearsay right there, and from Cohen the backstabber. You’ll follow anyone won’t you? You let me know when a bank is going to loan money on a property that appraises for less than the loan….. and I’m the idoit. People over value their homes in a daily basis. People sell cars daily for over blue book. 
Your fake diploma is showing your true colors and your brilliance. 

It is illegal. Period. I don't care who does it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Big girl

Big girl

Posted
  • Author
Posted
24 minutes ago, LumRaiderFan said:

This is the hidden content, please

I guess it's entertainment for the dopey Trump haters.

From the article:

This past week Judge Arthur Engoron of New York State Supreme Court, the lowest level of courts of general jurisdiction, levied a mammoth fine of some $370 million, including interest, against Donald Trump for purported fraud under a New York statute.  

The term fraud is used loosely since no one was defrauded, an element of a cause of action under common law fraud, and no one was harmed, also an element, and there was no proof of reliance, another element. This is fraud "in the air," as the saying goes: no harm by no one against no one for no loss by anyone.  

No one testified that they lost a penny from the purported fraud, or that they would not have wanted to deal with Trump as a customer. No one came forward to complain, except Attorney General Letitia James. But more about this modern-day Torquemada later in this column.

He defrauded banks and insurers. The state can sue in this instance.Civil enforcement actions are routine for government officials in every U.S. state and local government, and for the federal government. Most kinds of white collar legal violations are predominantly enforced through civil enforcement rather than criminal charges, in part, because this is perceived as less harsh and because it affords the government a wider range of remedies

This is the hidden content, please

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Reagan

Reagan

Posted
Posted
45 minutes ago, Big girl said:

Trump's lawyer did not request a jury.

This is the hidden content, please

Fake news!!  Trumps attorney, Alina Habba, is on record, I watched her say it, that the judge WOULD NOT ALLOW this to be tried by a jury.  She said they did not have an option!  This falls in line with what this judge said in, I think it was 2015, that jury's, and I'm paraphrasing, should not be allowed to make decisions.  That the judge knows more and should be the one making the final decision.  It's my understanding that in order to be able to do this he had to use residential fraud.  Well, any sane person knows Trump's situation is commercial.  

And I'll ask you again:  Who was it that filed a suit against Trump claiming fraud?  No one!  The big bank that Trump dealt with testified they were good customers.  Paid loans back on time.   And who would this money he's supposed to pay go to if no one claimed they were hurt?  It's like filing murder charges against someone when there is not a body!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
baddog

baddog

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, Big girl said:

He defrauded banks and insurers. The state can sue in this instance.Civil enforcement actions are routine for government officials in every U.S. state and local government, and for the federal government. Most kinds of white collar legal violations are predominantly enforced through civil enforcement rather than criminal charges, in part, because this is perceived as less harsh and because it affords the government a wider range of remedies

This is the hidden content, please

Did you see any banks or insurance companies as the plaintiffs in this suit? Nope. 
This is not big girl. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Big girl

Big girl

Posted
  • Author
Posted
32 minutes ago, Reagan said:

Fake news!!  Trumps attorney, Alina Habba, is on record, I watched her say it, that the judge WOULD NOT ALLOW this to be tried by a jury.  She said they did not have an option!  This falls in line with what this judge said in, I think it was 2015, that jury's, and I'm paraphrasing, should not be allowed to make decisions.  That the judge knows more and should be the one making the final decision.  It's my understanding that in order to be able to do this he had to use residential fraud.  Well, any sane person knows Trump's situation is commercial.  

And I'll ask you again:  Who was it that filed a suit against Trump claiming fraud?  No one!  The big bank that Trump dealt with testified they were good customers.  Paid loans back on time.   And who would this money he's supposed to pay go to if no one claimed they were hurt?  It's like filing murder charges against someone when there is not a body!!

Bs. She had an option

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Big girl

Big girl

Posted
  • Author
Posted
34 minutes ago, Reagan said:

Fake news!!  Trumps attorney, Alina Habba, is on record, I watched her say it, that the judge WOULD NOT ALLOW this to be tried by a jury.  She said they did not have an option!  This falls in line with what this judge said in, I think it was 2015, that jury's, and I'm paraphrasing, should not be allowed to make decisions.  That the judge knows more and should be the one making the final decision.  It's my understanding that in order to be able to do this he had to use residential fraud.  Well, any sane person knows Trump's situation is commercial.  

And I'll ask you again:  Who was it that filed a suit against Trump claiming fraud?  No one!  The big bank that Trump dealt with testified they were good customers.  Paid loans back on time.   And who would this money he's supposed to pay go to if no one claimed they were hurt?  It's like filing murder charges against someone when there is not a body!!

It doesn't matter if he paid back on time. He still lied.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Member Statistics

    46,202
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    Aclark1510
    Newest Member
    Aclark1510
    Joined


  • Posts

    • Big girl
      Susan Smith

      By Big girl · Posted

      Say that then. Don't just stop at i am pro-life. Thanks for the clarification.
    • Big girl
      Susan Smith

      By Big girl · Posted

      A life is being taken in both instances.
    • Big girl
      Juicy Smollett conviction overturned by Illinois Supreme Court

      By Big girl · Posted

      Thanks for the explanation.
    • BOSoxfan4life
      To the Fans Who Complain About Referees

      By BOSoxfan4life · Posted

      Preach
    • Preach
      To the Fans Who Complain About Referees

      By Preach · Posted

      I get it!!  I was once in your shoes. I was that person in the stands, loudly complaining about “bad officiating.” Now, with the rise of social media, it’s easier than ever to voice these criticisms online.  I thought I could see every call better than the officials on the floor. Then someone said to me, “If you can do better, get in the game.”   That challenge changed my life. Over 20 years ago, I became a basketball official, and what I’ve learned since then is eye-opening.   Officiating is not just about making calls. It’s about managing the game, the players, the coaches, and yes, the fans. We face a new generation of student-athletes who have been raised in a culture where everyone gets a trophy and losing is almost taboo. We deal with fans who question our integrity and sometimes become outright hostile.   I acknowledge that officials aren’t perfect; we have off days just like anyone else. However, the increasing hostility from fans is driving many to leave officiating. According to the National Federation of High School Associations, approximately 50,000 high school officials have left the profession since the 2018-19 season, with fan behavior being a significant factor.    Here’s the reality: without officials, there is no game.   So, instead of tearing down the people who make your games possible, here’s a suggestion:   • Thank the officials for being part of the game. • Thank them for the countless hours they spend studying rules, mastering mechanics, and working to improve. • Thank them for their patience with privilege-minded athletes and overly aggressive fans.   Next time you see an official, instead of criticizing, take a moment to say, “Thank you.” They’re out there to make the game happen, and trust me, it’s not as easy as it looks from the stands.   If you think you can do better, take the challenge like I did. Get in the game. You might just discover how much it takes to blow that whistle.

  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...