What do you think about the new signs in Port Arthur?

[thetragichippy]

They are located on 73/87 coming from Bridge City and Hwy 69 coming from Mid-County.  That is the only two I have seen, are there more?

Thoughts?

Price tag?

[tvc184]

Lipstick on a pig?

It is a ludicrous spending of public money as window dressing that will be taken out soon by a drunk driver. 

[thetragichippy]

49 minutes ago, tvc184 said:

It is a ludicrous spending of public money as window dressing that will be taken out soon by a drunk driver. 

Don't hold back......lol

 

[SmashMouth]

On 2/21/2024 at 11:17 AM, thetragichippy said:

They are located on 73/87 coming from Bridge City and Hwy 69 coming from Mid-County.  That is the only two I have seen, are there more?

Thoughts?

Price tag?

Haven't seen them. Are they simply billboards promoting Port Arthur?

[thetragichippy]

6 hours ago, SmashMouth said:

Haven't seen them. Are they simply billboards promoting Port Arthur?

They are metal (I think) lighted tower looking signs.....maybe 10' tall

 

[SmashMouth]

1 hour ago, thetragichippy said:

They are metal (I think) lighted tower looking signs.....maybe 10' tall

 

I’ll have to look in the morning. Gonna try a little redfishing. 

[tvc184]

3 hours ago, thetragichippy said:

They are metal (I think) lighted tower looking signs.....maybe 10' tall

 

With Port Arthur being sideways…. 

 

[WOSdrummer99]

Another on 73 coming in from Winnie by the levee. Too small to be cool. But definitely noticed them on my trip. Bet they spent way too much for them. 

What about the "side walk" in the median of 73 between PA and Winnie? Looks like another waste. I mean it can really be a side walk. Txdot must have some reason for it. Maybe a divider net.

[WOSdrummer99]

 

Signs looks like this. But the tower is erect 

[SmashMouth]

7 minutes ago, WOSdrummer99 said:

 

Signs looks like this. But the tower is erect 

You said erect. 

[thetragichippy]

On 2/24/2024 at 10:21 AM, WOSdrummer99 said:

What about the "side walk" in the median of 73 between PA and Winnie? Looks like another waste. I mean it can really be a side walk. Txdot must have some reason for it. Maybe a divider net.

I have not noticed this.....maybe a base for a wall or fence?

 

[bullets13]

The first time i passed one I got the impression it was leaning a little bit.  

[WOSdrummer99]

At night it's lit up from within the tower but not clearly recognizable as saying Port Arthur. Seems like a big waste of solor power when they could have used reflective paint.

[baddog]

My wife says they are hideous. I’ll see one tomorrow. 

[tvc184]

16 hours ago, WOSdrummer99 said:

At night it's lit up from within the tower but not clearly recognizable as saying Port Arthur. Seems like a big waste of solor power when they could have used reflective paint.

I saw them a couple of times before I realized that that was the signs that people were talking about. 🤣

[baddog]

Saw the one at 365 exit. Not impressed.

[tvc184]

4 hours ago, baddog said:

Saw the one at 365 exit. Not impressed.

The sign might not be impressive but I bet it sure makes you want to come to Port Arthur now, right?

 Like:

Geez, what have I been missing!!? 

[bullets13]

They’re hollow kind of, but lit up on both sides.  Makes it hard to read 

[tvc184]

1 hour ago, bullets13 said:

They’re hollow kind of, but lit up on both sides.  Makes it hard to read 

WRONG!!

They are of an excellent design, I am sure paid for at a high engineering and consulting cost.

 These signs scream of success!!

Seriously, if you are going to waste money on such an endeavor, that is the best they could come up with?

On the order hand, maybe one of the big oil companies donated the money and it really has no bearing on the taxpayers.

 On the other hand is it any different than the money wasted on the Welkom To Nederland sign? 

[wo-s#1]

There’s one on the corner of Proctor and Memorial also,it doesn’t look as bad as the one I seen on 73& Gulfway

[Reagan]

I've seen these signs.  But to me, the Port ought to be on the top and work down not the bottom and work up.  It looks silly the way it is!

[BMTSoulja1]

Personally, I like the new look, however, I do believe there are more pressing things that should've been addressed beforehand.

[tvc184]

1 hour ago, BMTSoulja1 said:

Personally, I like the new look, however, I do believe there are more pressing things that should've been addressed beforehand.

Like the signs should be about #1,437th on the list of things to do and they are on #7? 

[Mr. Buddy Garrity]

2 hours ago, BMTSoulja1 said:

Personally, I like the new look, however, I do believe there are more pressing things that should've been addressed beforehand.

The design doesn't look right, but I absolutely have no problem with new signs going up, they're actually long overdue like a number of things here. 

[mat]

Sometimes this type of improvement is done with Grant finding. I don’t know if that’s the case with the signs.