Reagan Posted March 6, 2024 Report Posted March 6, 2024 The three-judge panel took a close look at a lower court’s decision to enhance a defendant’s sentence due to “substantial interference with the administration of justice” during the Capitol attack. The catch? The appeals court deemed that the term “administration of justice” doesn’t cover Congress’s role in the electoral certification process. Translation: the enhanced sentences might not be on solid legal ground. This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.