CardinalBacker Posted March 12 Report Posted March 12 2 hours ago, BS Wildcats said: So deep down you know that Trump is/was a far superior potus than biden? No, as evidenced by the fact that Joe clapped Trump’s cheeks in 2020. I mean, other than the border, Biden has done a much better job than Trump by every possible measure-even though his faculties are diminished.
CardinalBacker Posted March 12 Report Posted March 12 3 hours ago, baddog said: Hillary? No…. The Dems could have trotted her back out in 2020, but what’s the point. She’s obviously less likable than even Trump. A political party would have to be especially stupid to run a candidate, lose, then rematch the same guy again four years later, right?
tvc184 Posted March 12 Report Posted March 12 9 hours ago, Big girl said: I agree, but the Republicans run on the platform of family values, which is hilarious. So does a leader of anything represent what you stand for? What do my family values have to do with a president or candidate? Jimmy Carter was probably one of the most down to Earth, decent and very religious leaders to ever hold the office and certainly in my lifetime. He led the country down the drain however and got kicked out by a landslide after one term. Which is better, a devout Christian who almost no one questions his sincerity and personal life but a horrible leader or a person who had some transgressions in his past but whose policies lead to prosperity? Neither stops me from nor leads me to my personal beliefs and values. Does the President, no matter who it is, affect yours?
baddog Posted March 12 Report Posted March 12 6 hours ago, CardinalBacker said: No…. The Dems could have trotted her back out in 2020, but what’s the point. She’s obviously less likable than even Trump. A political party would have to be especially stupid to run a candidate, lose, then rematch the same guy again four years later, right? Grover Cleveland….Democrat.
Big girl Posted March 12 Report Posted March 12 15 hours ago, tvc184 said: So does a leader of anything represent what you stand for? What do my family values have to do with a president or candidate? Jimmy Carter was probably one of the most down to Earth, decent and very religious leaders to ever hold the office and certainly in my lifetime. He led the country down the drain however and got kicked out by a landslide after one term. Which is better, a devout Christian who almost no one questions his sincerity and personal life but a horrible leader or a person who had some transgressions in his past but whose policies lead to prosperity? Neither stops me from nor leads me to my personal beliefs and values. Does the President, no matter who it is, affect yours? The Republicans run on a platform of family values. Why? who knows. Democrats don't. Republicans are hypocrites. Pro birth not Pro life
BS Wildcats Posted March 12 Report Posted March 12 3 hours ago, Big girl said: The Republicans run on a platform of family values. Why? who knows. Democrats don't. Republicans are hypocrites. Pro birth not Pro life Democrats have no family values, thus they can’t run on family values. They are for murdering babies, allowing schools to brainwash kids into thinking they are not the gender they truly are, allowing men to use women’s restrooms with no threat of repercussion, and they want no part of God at their conventions. As far the schools brainwashing the kids into thinking they are a different gender, this is done unbeknownst to the parents. I ask you big girl, would you stand for a school doing this to your kids? Democrats are plain and simple bunch of paganistic heathens. No wonder the Demoncrats don’t run on family values.
BS Wildcats Posted March 12 Report Posted March 12 On 3/11/2024 at 12:31 PM, Big girl said: Was MLK having affairs? Did you look into the Rev. MLK and his womanizing? Maybe Trump did have an affair with a porn star, before he was potus, but he made no claims of being a “minister of the lord” while engaging in adulterous behavior. Seems like you are doing what good Dems do, ignoring the facts.
Big girl Posted March 14 Report Posted March 14 On 3/12/2024 at 6:20 PM, BS Wildcats said: Democrats have no family values, thus they can’t run on family values. They are for murdering babies, allowing schools to brainwash kids into thinking they are not the gender they truly are, allowing men to use women’s restrooms with no threat of repercussion, and they want no part of God at their conventions. As far the schools brainwashing the kids into thinking they are a different gender, this is done unbeknownst to the parents. I ask you big girl, would you stand for a school doing this to your kids? Democrats are plain and simple bunch of paganistic heathens. No wonder the Demoncrats don’t run on family values.
Big girl Posted March 14 Report Posted March 14 On 3/12/2024 at 6:20 PM, BS Wildcats said: Democrats have no family values, thus they can’t run on family values. They are for murdering babies, allowing schools to brainwash kids into thinking they are not the gender they truly are, allowing men to use women’s restrooms with no threat of repercussion, and they want no part of God at their conventions. As far the schools brainwashing the kids into thinking they are a different gender, this is done unbeknownst to the parents. I ask you big girl, would you stand for a school doing this to your kids? Democrats are plain and simple bunch of paganistic heathens. No wonder the Demoncrats don’t run on family values. Yet you are OK with babies starving to death after birth or dying of some preventable disease, because his mother didn't keep her legs closed. Also, you have hate in your heart towards Muslims. God is love, period. You are a hypocrite.
CardinalBacker Posted March 14 Report Posted March 14 On 3/12/2024 at 2:58 AM, baddog said: Grover Cleveland….Democrat. Why'd you skip Richard Nixon, Republican? Oh, wait... because he was not that great of a candidate to begin with and lost to JFK, then public sentiment against the Vietnam conflict got him into office despite being a person of poor character. Then Watergate "happened." The funny thing is that Republican Congressmen approached Nixon and let him know that they WOULD be voting to impeach him if he didn't resign, so he did. And he never ran for office again, unsurprisingly. In 2024 we have another sorry candidate who's already been impeached twice and committed actual crimes much worse than Nixon ever did, but the Rs are in full favor of nominating him to lose again. It's insane. The lunatics are running the asylum, as noted by the immediate firing of 60 employees of the RNC this week. What does that mean? Nobody will be there to stop Trump and his cronies from looting the RNC treasury to pay his fines/legal bills instead of supporting other R candidates up and down the ticket that actually do have a chance of winning their races.
CardinalBacker Posted March 14 Report Posted March 14 On 3/11/2024 at 10:33 PM, tvc184 said: So does a leader of anything represent what you stand for? What do my family values have to do with a president or candidate? Jimmy Carter was probably one of the most down to Earth, decent and very religious leaders to ever hold the office and certainly in my lifetime. He led the country down the drain however and got kicked out by a landslide after one term. Which is better, a devout Christian who almost no one questions his sincerity and personal life but a horrible leader or a person who had some transgressions in his past but whose policies lead to prosperity? Neither stops me from nor leads me to my personal beliefs and values. Does the President, no matter who it is, affect yours? That's the fallacy of your argument... you don't have to pick one or the other. There are literally hundreds of men and women capable of doing the job who are good people AND would install good policies.
thetragichippy Posted March 14 Report Posted March 14 1 hour ago, Big girl said: Yet you are OK with babies starving to death after birth or dying of some preventable disease, because his mother didn't keep her legs closed. Also, you have hate in your heart towards Muslims. God is love, period. You are a hypocrite. LOL......You are ate up with CNN talking points. No one, unless evil is OK with babies starving to death. One could make an argument that someone who has 1 or more babies but can't afford food for them without government assistance is "OK with babies starving". The rest of your comments is nonsense too, but I'm not wasting time addressing it.
BS Wildcats Posted March 14 Report Posted March 14 6 hours ago, Big girl said: Yet you are OK with babies starving to death after birth or dying of some preventable disease, because his mother didn't keep her legs closed. Also, you have hate in your heart towards Muslims. God is love, period. You are a hypocrite. God is love, but those that did not get in the Ark, when he flooded the earth, perished. And those that died, included babies.
BS Wildcats Posted March 14 Report Posted March 14 6 hours ago, Big girl said: Yet you are OK with babies starving to death after birth or dying of some preventable disease, because his mother didn't keep her legs closed. Also, you have hate in your heart towards Muslims. God is love, period. You are a hypocrite. Why not address every part of my post? How about MLK, you just turning a blind eye to that one? I understand why, though you will never admit it.
tvc184 Posted March 15 Report Posted March 15 9 hours ago, CardinalBacker said: That's the fallacy of your argument... you don't have to pick one or the other. There are literally hundreds of men and women capable of doing the job who are good people AND would install good policies. There is no fallacy as it was a question. If I ask you do you like tacos or hamburgers better, that’s not a fallacy because they’re 1000s of other foods. Was Biden was chosen because of hundreds of other candidates weren’t as capable? Sorry but you don’t have hundreds to choose from.
CardinalBacker Posted March 15 Report Posted March 15 1 hour ago, tvc184 said: There is no fallacy as it was a question. If I ask you do you like tacos or hamburgers better, that’s not a fallacy because they’re 1000s of other foods. Was Biden was chosen because of hundreds of other candidates weren’t as capable? Sorry but you don’t have hundreds to choose from. In 2016 there were 16 candidates on the stage for the first debate, and Trump was better qualified than Carly Fiorina… the other 14 were without a doubt better experienced and would have served us more effectively. The sensible argument to make is “so what about experience? He was the right guy, obviously, because he ended up winning.” Except he did a horrible job, then lost, then tried to start a civil war, is facing 91 felony charges, countless civil suits, and needs $545 million dollars just to appeal cases which he’s already lost. By all means, let’s give the job back to that train wreck.
Englebert Posted March 15 Report Posted March 15 7 hours ago, CardinalBacker said: In 2016 there were 16 candidates on the stage for the first debate, and Trump was better qualified than Carly Fiorina… the other 14 were without a doubt better experienced and would have served us more effectively. The sensible argument to make is “so what about experience? He was the right guy, obviously, because he ended up winning.” Except he did a horrible job, then lost, then tried to start a civil war, is facing 91 felony charges, countless civil suits, and needs $545 million dollars just to appeal cases which he’s already lost. By all means, let’s give the job back to that train wreck. You have been spouting some revisionist history. Do you think people fully afflicted with TDS should be allowed to give their highly biased and highly inaccurate accounting of history? It is good for a laugh, but seriously...even you can't believe your own words. It is pretty disgusting that you seem to be in favor of a sitting president imprisoning and going after his political foes. Everyone can easily see that the charges brought against Trump are nothing but made up "crimes" to stifle a political rival. Even you can see it, just will not admit it...and seem to favor it. How do you live with yourself? You can reply with anything you like. I'm sure you will choose your proven path of spouting lies. Make me laugh some more.
CardinalBacker Posted March 15 Report Posted March 15 1 hour ago, Englebert said: You have been spouting some revisionist history. Do you think people fully afflicted with TDS should be allowed to give their highly biased and highly inaccurate accounting of history? It is good for a laugh, but seriously...even you can't believe your own words. It is pretty disgusting that you seem to be in favor of a sitting president imprisoning and going after his political foes. Everyone can easily see that the charges brought against Trump are nothing but made up "crimes" to stifle a political rival. Even you can see it, just will not admit it...and seem to favor it. How do you live with yourself? You can reply with anything you like. I'm sure you will choose your proven path of spouting lies. Make me laugh some more. They aren’t “made up crimes” when he was moving boxes of classified docs around Miralax, then had his attorneys tell the feds that they’d given them all back-those same attorneys resigned immediately when they realized that trump had them lie for him. We all heard trump in his own words/voice telling election officials to “just find him” the exact number of votes to overturn the free and fair election that was held. The fact that the DA is a joke doesn’t take away from the fact that we all heard what he did, and he shouldn’t need to be legally disqualified from ever holding office again-the voters should have enough CHARACTER to cut off support for him. Theyre out to get him, no doubt. That doesn’t mean that he hasn’t done anything wrong. I miss the days when conservatives had character.
baddog Posted March 15 Report Posted March 15 If only he had put them beside the Vette in the garage, we would hear not a peep.
LumRaiderFan Posted March 15 Report Posted March 15 3 minutes ago, baddog said: If only he had put them beside the Vette in the garage, we would hear not a peep. lol, 100% true. TDS appears to even affect some "conservatives".
Englebert Posted March 15 Report Posted March 15 14 minutes ago, CardinalBacker said: They aren’t “made up crimes” when he was moving boxes of classified docs around Miralax, then had his attorneys tell the feds that they’d given them all back-those same attorneys resigned immediately when they realized that trump had them lie for him. We all heard trump in his own words/voice telling election officials to “just find him” the exact number of votes to overturn the free and fair election that was held. The fact that the DA is a joke doesn’t take away from the fact that we all heard what he did, and he shouldn’t need to be legally disqualified from ever holding office again-the voters should have enough CHARACTER to cut off support for him. Theyre out to get him, no doubt. That doesn’t mean that he hasn’t done anything wrong. I miss the days when conservatives had character. Well, we can't call you a Conservative. You are definitely lacking character. Tell us some more lies about how bad the economy was during Trump's tenure. Tell us what you and the Democrats would have done to handle Covid better, especially after all the Blue State (and many Red State) governors shut down their state. We can all use another dose of your comedy routine. And again, made up crimes. Ask Bill Clinton what happened to him for doing worse. Do you even remember? We all heard Trump say in his own words find the votes. For someone to interpret that as "manufacture illegal votes" would have to be severely ate up with TDS. Thus...your post. You have also, on many occasions, accused Trump of instigating an insurrection for stating "march peacefully and patriotically to make your voices heard". So it is abundantly clear you have absolutely no credibility when it comes to interpreting one's speech. In fact, your interpretation is so bad that boisterous laughter can only follow. What is going to happen to this country when you, and people like you, allow the Democrats to persecute and prosecute their political rivals with zero repercussions. Obama did it. Hillary did it. Biden just took it to a new level. And you condone it. You would rather focus on Trump possessing documents that he probably had every right to have. How shameful.
CardinalBacker Posted March 15 Report Posted March 15 1 hour ago, baddog said: If only he had put them beside the Vette in the garage, we would hear not a peep. Wrong again. If Biden had been showing them to reporters, then secreted them away, then lied to the feds about giving them all back, we’d be talking about apples to apples. Also, the fact remains that sometimes people leave with docs and if discovered, they self report and give them back. Trump as much as admitted thst he intended to use them as “insurance” against his “enemies.”
CardinalBacker Posted March 15 Report Posted March 15 4 minutes ago, Englebert said: Well, we can't call you a Conservative. You are definitely lacking character. Tell us some more lies about how bad the economy was during Trump's tenure. Tell us what you and the Democrats would have done to handle Covid better, especially after all the Blue State (and many Red State) governors shut down their state. We can all use another dose of your comedy routine. And again, made up crimes. Ask Bill Clinton what happened to him for doing worse. Do you even remember? We all heard Trump say in his own words find the votes. For someone to interpret that as "manufacture illegal votes" would have to be severely ate up with TDS. Thus...your post. You have also, on many occasions, accused Trump of instigating an insurrection for stating "march peacefully and patriotically to make your voices heard". So it is abundantly clear you have absolutely no credibility when it comes to interpreting one's speech. In fact, your interpretation is so bad that boisterous laughter can only follow. What is going to happen to this country when you, and people like you, allow the Democrats to persecute and prosecute their political rivals with zero repercussions. Obama did it. Hillary did it. Biden just took it to a new level. And you condone it. You would rather focus on Trump possessing documents that he probably had every right to have. How shameful. Everything that you said can be disproven. When you’re worried about political witch hunts, you left out the Clinton Impeachment, or that Trump’s campaign slogan was literally “Lock Her Up.” Trump and his minions are at best, no worse than the Dems on political persecutions. So which is it… either Trump couldn’t find any actual dirt on Hillary or he found it and did nothing? Trump destroyed our economy and exploded the debt, period. And if you want to blame the Dems’ plandemic… then you have to admit that trump was powerless to stop their evil plan, lol. Trumpers worship their guy when he admits to sexually assaulting women as “locker room talk,” but then cry when he’s found responsible for sexually assaulting women as the work of “them dirty democrats!” It should physically hurt when someone is that stupid. Big girl 1
baddog Posted March 15 Report Posted March 15 15 minutes ago, CardinalBacker said: Wrong again. If Biden’s had been showing them to reporters, then secreted them away, then lied to the feds about giving them all back, we’d be talking about apples to apples. Also, the fact remains that sometimes people leave with docs and if discovered, they self report and give them back. Trump as much as admitted thst he intended to use rheum as “insistence”’against his “enemies.” Here’s a good one….. what exactly was in the documents Trump had that was so secret and illegal for him to possess? That too is a secret.
Englebert Posted March 15 Report Posted March 15 5 minutes ago, CardinalBacker said: Everything that you said can be disproven. When you’re worried about political witch hunts, you left out the Clinton Impeachment, or that Trump’s campaign slogan was literally “Lock Her Up.” Trump and his minions are at best, no worse than the Dems on political persecutions. So which is it… either Trump couldn’t find any actual dirt on Hillary or he found it and did nothing? Trump destroyed our economy and exploded the debt, period. And if you want to blame the Dems’ plandemic… then you have to admit that trump was powerless to stop their evil plan, lol. Trumpers worship their guy when he admits to sexually assaulting women as “locker room talk,” but then cry when he’s found responsible for sexually assaulting women as the work of “them dirty democrats!” It should physically hurt when someone is that stupid. More lies, and accusing me of lies. How long will you embarrass yourself. Obama weaponized the IRS against Conservatives. He spied on Fox News (and AP) reporters. Are you denying these facts? I'm sure he probably had something to do with Hillary's "Russia, Russia, Russia" dossier. No telling what else was done. Biden has a new attack almost daily. You even admitted it. So try to disprove these. And for bonus points, start listing those Trump political persecutions being done to Democrats. Maybe there are some. Otherwise, let's see if you must consider calling yourself a liar. Trump did not run on "Lock her up". It was a saying at his rallies that caught on. He did not go after her because it was against form and fashion to go after your political foes. Do you remember when Conservative had character? I wish he would have had her investigated. She would be rotting in prison right now...where she belongs. Trump fought against the spending bills given to him. He even shut down the government because of it. Do you remember that? Can't you get anything right? Again, you are horrible at revising history to fit your TDS filled criteria. You have proven that you cannot analyze other people. It is laughable when you try. And yes, you should feel physically hurt when you are this stupid...if you had character. What lies will you reply with now? Maybe get Big Girl to help you because you are doing a terrible job on your own.
Recommended Posts