Jump to content

BULLS**t From the Pulpit


Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, baddog said:

The thing that gets me is the two-faced women. They are so mature in their thinking that society has let them determine  that, if their pregnancy is unwanted, they can terminate and take a life under some inalienable right. Why can’t these same women make a mature decision before sex and prevent the pregnancy in the first place. I’m sure there are government programs that can help them get the birth control if they can’t afford it. Irresponsible women, making irresponsible decisions, all of a sudden being empowered with the “right” to take an innocent life that they could have prevented. How lame of an attitude. Promiscuous women who weren’t taught that sex has consequences. 99% of the time, sex to a man is yes. It’s the woman who consents……..don’t lie.

Yeah, they’re all just a bunch of whores begging men to jump their bones. If sexism were a crime, you’d be under felony indictment.

Oh yeah, got a number on how many have said yes to you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, UT alum said:

Yeah, they’re all just a bunch of whores begging men to jump their bones. If sexism were a crime, you’d be under felony indictment.

Oh yeah, got a number on how many have said yes to you?

You are ate up with it. Typical liberal response. Do you really think housewives are the majority of baby killers? Whores actually use protection. Promiscuous women have abortions to eliminate their bad decision, you know, their by-product of sex.

Personal attacks mean you are out of ammo. You never had ammo anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, baddog said:

You are ate up with it. Typical liberal response. Do you really think housewives are the majority of baby killers? Whores actually use protection. Promiscuous women have abortions to eliminate their bad decision, you know, their by-product of sex.

Personal attacks mean you are out of ammo. You never had ammo anyway.

Reread your post. All you do is blame the woman. Like she’s always been blamed. “Rape? Nah, she was asking for it. See how she’s dressed?” That was the implicit defense for years that kept women from coming forth with rape charges. You ignore history.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, UT alum said:

Reread your post. All you do is blame the woman. Like she’s always been blamed. “Rape? Nah, she was asking for it. See how she’s dressed?” That was the implicit defense for years that kept women from coming forth with rape charges. You ignore history.

Like I said, you’re ate up with it. Who said anything about rape? Your hiatus didn’t improve your ability to reason. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, UT alum said:

 

You said it all with “plenty of women have manipulated the system to make the male completely at fault”. Blame the woman. Both sexist and ignorant. How do you manipulate a dna test?

I was talking the court system.  

I know of plenty people on both sides …..deadbeat sperm donors and psychotic egg donors

im not blaming all women but don’t act like all women are angels.

Sure let’s castrate them for missing payments so then should women should get Hysterectomy after an abortion (unless it’s for life threatening)so they can’t murder babies anymore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 5GallonBucket said:

I’m referring to yours and many others stance when asked “your ok with murdering babies” and the typical response is “I believe in a woman s choice”

you are ok with it plain and simple

 

Babies aren’t babies until they are born and the curd is cut. They are fetuses with no legal standing under the law.  You prefer the babies to come, then if they are unwanted, neglected, or just born into a world of poverty that gives them a start from the back of the line, tough luck. Don’t look to society for help. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, UT alum said:

Babies aren’t babies until they are born and the curd is cut. They are fetuses with no legal standing under the law.  You prefer the babies to come, then if they are unwanted, neglected, or just born into a world of poverty that gives them a start from the back of the line, tough luck. Don’t look to society for help. 

If a drunk driver kills a pregnant woman, why is he charged with 2 murders?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 5GallonBucket said:

I was talking the court system.  

I know of plenty people on both sides …..deadbeat sperm donors and psychotic egg donors

im not blaming all women but don’t act like all women are angels.

Sure let’s castrate them for missing payments so then should women should get Hysterectomy after an abortion (unless it’s for life threatening)so they can’t murder babies anymore.

Get off the murder jag, dude. You make the women sound like criminals, the men were just flies lured innocently to the honey pot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, UT alum said:

Babies aren’t babies until they are born and the curd is cut. They are fetuses with no legal standing under the law.  You prefer the babies to come, then if they are unwanted, neglected, or just born into a world of poverty that gives them a start from the back of the line, tough luck. Don’t look to society for help. 

If a woman has a miscarriage, why do people cry?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, baddog said:

If a drunk driver kills a pregnant woman, why is he charged with 2 murders?

38 states have such laws. Sort of like forcing an unwanted miscarriage. Even California has such a law. Gives justice to the parents denied their chile by a third party (drunk driver).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, UT alum said:

38 states have such laws. Sort of like forcing an unwanted miscarriage. Even California has such a law. Gives justice to the parents denied their chile by a third party (drunk driver).

BUT IT’S JUST FETUS!!!!! You claim that a fetus has no legal standing under the law. You are apparently wrong. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, UT alum said:

Dreams for the future are crushed. A miscarriage is nothing even remotely similar to abortion. 

Next woman you know who has a miscarriage, you go up and tell her that her dead fetus was simply a dream for the future. It wasn’t really a baby. Yeah, you tell her that smart guy. 
Nothing remotely similar???? How about both fetuses are dead? See the similarity?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, baddog said:

BUT IT’S JUST FETUS!!!!! You claim that a fetus has no legal standing under the law. You are apparently wrong. 

If the mother loses the fetus but not her life is murder charged?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, baddog said:

Next woman you know who has a miscarriage, you go up and tell her that her dead fetus was simply a dream for the future. It wasn’t really a baby. Yeah, you tell her that smart guy. 

I will. Not that coarsely. Again, trying to make apples into oranges. Keep it jumbled. A solution might actually help promote unity in this country, heaven forbid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, UT alum said:

I will. Not that coarsely. Again, trying to make apples into oranges. Keep it jumbled. A solution might actually help promote unity in this country, heaven forbid.

Squirmed out of that one. You won’t do it, but it is easy to say you will. Why not that coarsely? Why change your tune?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/19/2024 at 10:45 AM, UT alum said:

Babies aren’t babies until they are born and the curd is cut. They are fetuses with no legal standing under the law.  You prefer the babies to come, then if they are unwanted, neglected, or just born into a world of poverty that gives them a start from the back of the line, tough luck. Don’t look to society for help. 

 

On 6/19/2024 at 10:45 AM, UT alum said:

It’s not murder. Until the statutes are changed. 

Oh I see the govt controls your conscience….why am I not surprised.  
no need for you to say anymore….i know exactly the type of person you are…..and good luck with that….well actually luck won’t help you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,993
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    PressBox Stats
    Newest Member
    PressBox Stats
    Joined



  • Posts

    • 2.6% play D-1 football.    0.023% make it to the NFL. 99.97% need to make it in real life.    
    • And they still picked Nederland not to make the playoffs.......
    • It’s not that simple.    You just read where UT Alum said that Hardin County was 80% democrat in 1980… but according to you the fabled “switch” was finished by Nixon a decade earlier.    That’s the fallacy of your argument… we can all agree that as far back as the Civil War, Democrats strongly opposed any measure  that would benefit the black community.  That policy continued all of the way up through the 1960s. That’s when there was a shift…. But it’s not what you think.    It’s not like all of the old white bigots said “to heck with this! Let’s go be republicans instead.” My contention is that the Democrat Party of old didn’t hate black people… they needed the votes of white people, and they got them by whipping up racial animosity towards black people.  Right about the time that the civil rights act was passed, the leaders of the democrat party realized that there just wasn’t a whole lot of white on black racial hate to work with… and with the changing demographics in America, they recognized that the next voting block to control would be the minorities, and the best way to harness that vote was by providing them a common enemy… whitey.  That’s why you had guys like Strom Thurman and George Wallace renounce their “racist” ways and pivot to trying to win over the monitorities instead of catering to racist whites.    You fast forward about 30 years and the democrats have convinced their voters that the whites are the source of all of their problems… just like they told whites that the blacks were the source of all of their problems. It’s not that the racist shifted sides… the Dems just shifted their focus because voters didn’t care about the old racism anymore.    But, that same time frame and approach left a void. Suddenly you have white people (who aren’t racist) being told by democrats that  “you don’t even realize how big of a racist you are, and everything you worked for means nothing because it was the result of white privilege, and in fact our voters deserve everything that you have…” and people got tired of it, so the next thing you know you’ve got a lot of people like the ones on this board who will fall in line behind somebody who says “I’ll fight those democrats for you.” He calls immigrants rapists, blows his dog whistle until he passes out, and convinces the tiny group of actual racists and antisemites that it’s safe to come out of hiding.  “Build the wall” is their rallying cry. The democrat response? They open our borders completely, even though they know it’s bad for us… but they need to keep fanning the flames, too. And you can’t be opposed to the guy who wants to build a wall, but then construct one yourself, right? It’s madness, and it’s all about getting “us” to vote against “them” on both sides. And it really, really needs to stop. 
    • Southern Democrats=KKK!  No denying that fact.  You should have also learned that murder was illegal by then, but that doesn’t stop you from supporting abortion.  
    • You’re an embarrassment to the medical profession. Why does anyone refuse a drug test? They have something to hide. Biden needs to be scanned for electronic devices to keep him from being fed the answers.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...