Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

You are correct. Great win for MC Neese. They tried their best to blow it at the end, however I was wrong on 1 and done. Some teams from the ACC are not very strong. Face it, today Clemson had shooters about like A&M, not very good , but you are correct, I blew the call on this game. I am glad they won, however the SLC is still a very weak conference and why only the winner will get a bid for March Madness

Posted

Remember that Lamar had a pretty good record and a good 2nd place finish in the SLC and didn’t even get a sniff to one of the Rinky Dink tournaments. The committee members do not like the SLC and you can rest assured they are not happy with this upset, I just hope Clemson doesn’t fire their coach over this loss like Texas is about to do to Terry!

Posted
29 minutes ago, Separation Scientist said:

I am flipping channels on TV and see UIW playing Illinois St. in the CBI tourney. I don't get it, why wouldn't Lamar be in this? Lamar was clearly the #2 team in the SLC, I think Lamar should have been in the NIT. Why would the CBI pick the 7th place UIW team from the SLC?     

You actually have to pay money to enter the CBI tournament so other than the little bit of exposure you get maybe it is not financially practicable. 

Posted
15 hours ago, snakehead26 said:

You actually have to pay money to enter the CBI tournament so other than the little bit of exposure you get maybe it is not financially practicable. 

This

Posted
On 3/26/2025 at 5:05 AM, Separation Scientist said:

I am flipping channels on TV and see UIW playing Illinois St. in the CBI tourney. I don't get it, why wouldn't Lamar be in this? Lamar was clearly the #2 team in the SLC, I think Lamar should have been in the NIT. Why would the CBI pick the 7th place UIW team from the SLC?     

NIT at least used to give automatic bids to regular season conference champions (who obviously didn’t win their conference tournament and get an NCAA bid).  They did away with that rule before last year’s tournament and this year added some automatic bids for power 5 conference non-NCAA qualifiers.  In short, it has now just become a secondary top-tier conference tournament.  If McNeese had lost in the SLC tournament, they MIGHT have gotten a bid (honestly as much to do with Will Wade, and maybe even more so, that manager who has gone viral) but the NIT will mostly be filled with very average to bad big conference schools.  
 

And as snakehead correctly stated, the other post-season tournaments are just money grabs.  It is my understanding both the men’s and women’s teams turned down postseason bids this year, the women to the inaugural WNIT (which has the old men’s rule about regular season champs).  My guess is the deciding factor on both was $$. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,268
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    DAWG79
    Newest Member
    DAWG79
    Joined
×
×
  • Create New...