Reagan Posted June 29 Report Posted June 29 Allies of Vice President Kamala Harris expressed anger and frustration after she was left out of the conversation as a replacement atop the Democratic ticket following President Joe Biden’s horrific debate performance, according to a Saturday report. This is going to be fun to watch! This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Quote
BS Wildcats Posted June 30 Report Posted June 30 5 hours ago, Reagan said: Allies of Vice President Kamala Harris expressed anger and frustration after she was left out of the conversation as a replacement atop the Democratic ticket following President Joe Biden’s horrific debate performance, according to a Saturday report. This is going to be fun to watch! This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up She’s going to start “blanking” someone to try and get there!! She be a hoe! Quote
baddog Posted June 30 Report Posted June 30 She ran for president and was the first to go. Why should anyone worry about the 3 people who are her allies? Quote
Reagan Posted July 3 Author Report Posted July 3 DELIGHTFUL! Black Democrat Warns ‘We Gon' Blow The Party Up' if They Choose White Man Over Kamala! I told you this is gonna be fun! This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Quote
BS Wildcats Posted July 3 Report Posted July 3 7 hours ago, Reagan said: DELIGHTFUL! Black Democrat Warns ‘We Gon' Blow The Party Up' if They Choose White Man Over Kamala! I told you this is gonna be fun! This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Why in the hell would you pick Kamala? Let’s see, so the Dummycrats can claim the first black woman as potus. Really hasn’t worked out being the first black female VP! All the D’s are worried about is the first of something in office. They may soon have the first Alzheimer’s patient as potus. Let’s hope not, for the sake of the country. Quote
CardinalBacker Posted July 3 Report Posted July 3 Yeah... they kinda made a big ol' poop sandwich when they nominated a VP solely based on her race and gender. That's not just some conspiracy theory, that's what Biden said he was gonna do, and he did. Now the Ds are gonna have to sit down at the table and take a big ol' bite. But at least she'll have immunity as the President if she gets out of line, lol. Quote
CardinalBacker Posted July 3 Report Posted July 3 Oh.... and all of those charges y'all planned on hanging on "The Big Guy?" He was immune as VP, too. Quote
thetragichippy Posted July 3 Report Posted July 3 5 hours ago, CardinalBacker said: Oh.... and all of those charges y'all planned on hanging on "The Big Guy?" He was immune as VP, too. You may want to read the actual ruling versus listen to Mr 9-0 Andrew Weissmann........ Taking and accepting bribes would not be an official act and certainly not be immune..... The VP is also not the President.......VP can't declassify documents...... baddog 1 Quote
tvc184 Posted July 4 Report Posted July 4 7 hours ago, thetragichippy said: You may want to read the actual ruling versus listen to Mr 9-0 Andrew Weissmann........ Taking and accepting bribes would not be an official act and certainly not be immune..... The VP is also not the President.......VP can't declassify documents...... I will add this, the immunity ruling has brought out some of the most ridiculous statements and accusations. Like most times, headlines rule the day and the media sure doesn’t fact check any of that. It would be great for the Facebook fact checkers shut down a majority of the claims with their false information stamp. This example illustrates have fact checking only goes one way. The Supreme Court mentioned three situations. Constitutional authority, executive authority and no authority. Two of the three can potentially have no immunity depending on the situation. So… IMMUNITY- 1. Absolutely 2. Maybe not 3. None People: (a) Get to #1 and quit reading (b) Read and understand it but lie for political reasons (c) Rely on headlines and comments from people in (b) thetragichippy 1 Quote
tvc184 Posted July 4 Report Posted July 4 12 hours ago, CardinalBacker said: Oh.... and all of those charges y'all planned on hanging on "The Big Guy?" He was immune as VP, too. The vp has no constitutional authority except presiding over the Senate to cast a vote only if it breaks a tie and counting ballots after an election. A president under the Constitution is 1. commander-in-chief 2. can issue executive orders 3. has the sole discretion to nominate federal judges and cabinet members 4. has the sole authority to make treaty agreements with foreign governments. The vp has the 1. constitutional authority to vote on the Senate if needed to break a tie. So I guess if someone tried to file charges against the vp for voting in a tied issue, the vp would have immunity from that vote choice. Quote
Big girl Posted July 20 Report Posted July 20 On 7/3/2024 at 6:07 AM, BS Wildcats said: Why in the hell would you pick Kamala? Let’s see, so the Dummycrats can claim the first black woman as potus. Really hasn’t worked out being the first black female VP! All the D’s are worried about is the first of something in office. They may soon have the first Alzheimer’s patient as potus. Let’s hope not, for the sake of the country. What makes you think that Biden has Alzheimer's? Quote
BS Wildcats Posted July 21 Report Posted July 21 2 hours ago, Big girl said: What makes you think that Biden has Alzheimer's? If you don’t think there is some sort of cognitive issue, Alzheimer’s or not, you’re not much of a medical professional. He has no business being potus, and Harris will be much worse! Quote
UT alum Posted July 22 Report Posted July 22 On 6/29/2024 at 4:42 PM, Reagan said: Allies of Vice President Kamala Harris expressed anger and frustration after she was left out of the conversation as a replacement atop the Democratic ticket following President Joe Biden’s horrific debate performance, according to a Saturday report. This is going to be fun to watch! This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up WRONG!!! Quote
tvc184 Posted July 22 Report Posted July 22 Now Nancy Pelosi has endorsed Harris. Harris has secured a commitment from at least half of the delegates date needs for the nomination. Quote
UT alum Posted July 22 Report Posted July 22 6 minutes ago, tvc184 said: Now Nancy Pelosi has endorsed Harris. Harris has secured a commitment from at least half of the delegates date needs for the nomination. I wonder if Trump will agree to weekly debates with her like he challenged Biden to do? That was a rhetorical question. Of course the chicken will back down. He’s already said he won’t even debate her once unless it’s on FOX. Think she’ll back down? Another rhetorical question. LumRaiderFan 1 Quote
tvc184 Posted July 23 Report Posted July 23 1 hour ago, UT alum said: I wonder if Trump will agree to weekly debates with her like he challenged Biden to do? That was a rhetorical question. Of course the chicken will back down. He’s already said he won’t even debate her once unless it’s on FOX. Think she’ll back down? Another rhetorical question. I think that Trump is likely chomping at the bit to debate. Quote
UT alum Posted July 23 Report Posted July 23 3 minutes ago, tvc184 said: I think that Trump is likely chomping at the bit to debate. He’s already crawfishing. He had no problem debating Biden on ABC. Why the sudden animosity towards ABC? He ain’t chomping at nothing but Big Macs and chicken strips. Quote
tvc184 Posted July 23 Report Posted July 23 30 minutes ago, UT alum said: He’s already crawfishing. He had no problem debating Biden on ABC. Why the sudden animosity towards ABC? He ain’t chomping at nothing but Big Macs and chicken strips. So you’re calling it now, Trump won’t debate? It was Biden who threw all the unheard of rules like they get to pick the venue, the time, amount of seconds for rebuttal, not addressing each other directly, no crowds, mics turned off when not speaking, etc. Why? Because that would take away a Trump advantage but Biden held the cards The Dems were probably crowing when Trump had to concede or not debate. HA! We’ve got him now!! Then Biden showed what everyone should have known. Now the ball appears to be in Trump’s court and apparently some Dems might not like it when the shoe is on the other foot. Quote
UT alum Posted July 23 Report Posted July 23 1 hour ago, tvc184 said: So you’re calling it now, Trump won’t debate? It was Biden who threw all the unheard of rules like they get to pick the venue, the time, amount of seconds for rebuttal, not addressing each other directly, no crowds, mics turned off when not speaking, etc. Why? Because that would take away a Trump advantage but Biden held the cards The Dems were probably crowing when Trump had to concede or not debate. HA! We’ve got him now!! Then Biden showed what everyone should have known. Now the ball appears to be in Trump’s court and apparently some Dems might not like it when the shoe is on the other foot. Not by any means. Dems will say if he wants FOX to host it, bring it on. She ain’t the one who’s scared. He won’t do it but once, though. Quote
Reagan Posted July 23 Author Report Posted July 23 7 minutes ago, UT alum said: Not by any means. Dems will say if he wants FOX to host it, bring it on. She ain’t the one who’s scared. He won’t do it but once, though. He’s gonna have to control is laughter every time she cackles! LOL!! Quote
Big girl Posted July 23 Report Posted July 23 18 hours ago, UT alum said: He’s already crawfishing. He had no problem debating Biden on ABC. Why the sudden animosity towards ABC? He ain’t chomping at nothing but Big Macs and chicken strips. 😃😃😃😃😃😃😃😃🤣🤣🤣🤣 UT alum 1 Quote
UT alum Posted July 23 Report Posted July 23 15 hours ago, Reagan said: He’s gonna have to control is laughter every time she cackles! LOL!! He has no self control. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.