VP Harris Allies Fume After Democrats Look Past Her As Biden Replacement!

[Reagan]

Allies of Vice President Kamala Harris expressed anger and frustration after she was left out of the conversation as a replacement atop the Democratic ticket following President Joe Biden’s horrific debate performance, according to a Saturday report.   This is going to be fun to watch!

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

[BS Wildcats]

5 hours ago, Reagan said:

Allies of Vice President Kamala Harris expressed anger and frustration after she was left out of the conversation as a replacement atop the Democratic ticket following President Joe Biden’s horrific debate performance, according to a Saturday report.   This is going to be fun to watch!

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

She’s going to start “blanking” someone to try and get there!!  She be a hoe!

 

[baddog]

She ran for president and was the first to go. Why should anyone worry about the 3 people who are her allies?

[Reagan]

DELIGHTFUL! Black Democrat Warns ‘We Gon' Blow The Party Up' if They Choose White Man Over Kamala!  
I told you this is gonna be fun!  
 

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

[BS Wildcats]

7 hours ago, Reagan said:

DELIGHTFUL! Black Democrat Warns ‘We Gon' Blow The Party Up' if They Choose White Man Over Kamala!  
I told you this is gonna be fun!  
 

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

Why in the hell would you pick Kamala?  Let’s see, so the Dummycrats can claim the first black woman as potus.  Really hasn’t worked out being the first black female VP!  All the D’s are worried about is the first of something in office.  They may soon have the first Alzheimer’s patient as potus.  Let’s hope not, for the sake of the country.

[CardinalBacker]

Yeah... they kinda made a big ol' poop sandwich when they nominated a VP solely based on her race and gender.  That's not just some conspiracy theory, that's what Biden said he was gonna do, and he did.  Now the Ds are gonna have to sit down at the table and take a big ol' bite.  

But at least she'll have immunity as the President if she gets out of line, lol.  

[CardinalBacker]

Oh.... and all of those charges y'all planned on hanging on "The Big Guy?"  He was immune as VP, too. 

[thetragichippy]

5 hours ago, CardinalBacker said:

Oh.... and all of those charges y'all planned on hanging on "The Big Guy?"  He was immune as VP, too. 

You may want to read the actual ruling versus listen to Mr 9-0 Andrew Weissmann........

Taking and accepting bribes would not be an official act and certainly not be immune..... The VP is also not the President.......VP can't declassify documents......

[tvc184]

7 hours ago, thetragichippy said:

You may want to read the actual ruling versus listen to Mr 9-0 Andrew Weissmann........

Taking and accepting bribes would not be an official act and certainly not be immune..... The VP is also not the President.......VP can't declassify documents......

I will add this, the immunity ruling has brought out some of the most ridiculous statements and accusations.

 Like most times, headlines rule the day and the media sure doesn’t fact check any of that. It would be great for the Facebook fact checkers shut down a majority of the claims with their false information stamp.

This example illustrates have fact checking only goes one way.

 The Supreme Court mentioned three situations. Constitutional authority, executive authority and no authority. Two of the three can potentially have no immunity depending on the situation. So…

IMMUNITY-

1. Absolutely 

2. Maybe not

 3. None

People:

(a) Get to #1 and quit reading 

(b) Read and understand it but lie for political reasons 

(c) Rely on headlines and comments from people in (b)

[tvc184]

12 hours ago, CardinalBacker said:

Oh.... and all of those charges y'all planned on hanging on "The Big Guy?"  He was immune as VP, too. 

The vp has no constitutional authority except presiding over the Senate to cast a vote only if it breaks a tie and counting ballots after an election.

A president under the Constitution is

1.  commander-in-chief

2. can issue executive orders

3. has the sole discretion to nominate federal judges and cabinet members

4. has the sole authority to make treaty agreements with foreign governments.

 The vp has the

1. constitutional authority to vote on the Senate if needed to break a tie.

So I guess if someone tried to file charges against the vp for voting in a tied issue, the vp would have immunity from that vote choice. 

[Reagan]

 

 

[LumRaiderFan]

6 hours ago, Reagan said:

 

 

Dumb and Dumber!

[Reagan]

 

True dat!

[Big girl]

On 7/3/2024 at 6:07 AM, BS Wildcats said:

Why in the hell would you pick Kamala?  Let’s see, so the Dummycrats can claim the first black woman as potus.  Really hasn’t worked out being the first black female VP!  All the D’s are worried about is the first of something in office.  They may soon have the first Alzheimer’s patient as potus.  Let’s hope not, for the sake of the country.

What makes you think that Biden has Alzheimer's?

[BS Wildcats]

2 hours ago, Big girl said:

What makes you think that Biden has Alzheimer's?

If you don’t think there is some sort of cognitive issue, Alzheimer’s or not, you’re not much of a medical professional.  He has no business being potus, and Harris will be much worse!

[UT alum]

On 6/29/2024 at 4:42 PM, Reagan said:

Allies of Vice President Kamala Harris expressed anger and frustration after she was left out of the conversation as a replacement atop the Democratic ticket following President Joe Biden’s horrific debate performance, according to a Saturday report.   This is going to be fun to watch!

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

WRONG!!!

[tvc184]

Now Nancy Pelosi has endorsed Harris. Harris has secured a commitment from at least half of the delegates date needs for the nomination. 

[UT alum]

6 minutes ago, tvc184 said:

Now Nancy Pelosi has endorsed Harris. Harris has secured a commitment from at least half of the delegates date needs for the nomination. 

I wonder if Trump will agree to weekly debates with her like he challenged Biden to do? That was a rhetorical question. Of course the chicken will back down. He’s already said he won’t even debate her once unless it’s on FOX. Think she’ll back down? Another rhetorical question.

[tvc184]

1 hour ago, UT alum said:

I wonder if Trump will agree to weekly debates with her like he challenged Biden to do? That was a rhetorical question. Of course the chicken will back down. He’s already said he won’t even debate her once unless it’s on FOX. Think she’ll back down? Another rhetorical question.

I think that Trump is likely chomping at the bit to debate.

[UT alum]

3 minutes ago, tvc184 said:

I think that Trump is likely chomping at the bit to debate.

He’s already crawfishing. He had no problem debating Biden on ABC. Why the sudden animosity towards ABC? He ain’t chomping at nothing but Big Macs and chicken strips.

[tvc184]

30 minutes ago, UT alum said:

He’s already crawfishing. He had no problem debating Biden on ABC. Why the sudden animosity towards ABC? He ain’t chomping at nothing but Big Macs and chicken strips.

So you’re calling it now, Trump won’t debate?

It was Biden who threw all the unheard of rules like they get to pick the venue, the time, amount of seconds for rebuttal, not addressing each other directly, no crowds, mics turned off when not speaking, etc.

Why? Because that would take away a Trump advantage but Biden held the cards  

The Dems were probably crowing when Trump had to concede or not debate. HA! We’ve got him now!!

Then Biden showed what everyone should have known.

Now the ball appears to be in Trump’s court and apparently some Dems might not like it when the shoe is on the other foot. 

[UT alum]

1 hour ago, tvc184 said:

So you’re calling it now, Trump won’t debate?

It was Biden who threw all the unheard of rules like they get to pick the venue, the time, amount of seconds for rebuttal, not addressing each other directly, no crowds, mics turned off when not speaking, etc.

Why? Because that would take away a Trump advantage but Biden held the cards  

The Dems were probably crowing when Trump had to concede or not debate. HA! We’ve got him now!!

Then Biden showed what everyone should have known.

Now the ball appears to be in Trump’s court and apparently some Dems might not like it when the shoe is on the other foot. 

Not by any means. Dems will say if he wants FOX to host it, bring it on. She ain’t the one who’s scared. He won’t do it but once, though.

[Reagan]

7 minutes ago, UT alum said:

Not by any means. Dems will say if he wants FOX to host it, bring it on. She ain’t the one who’s scared. He won’t do it but once, though.

He’s gonna have to control is laughter every time she cackles! LOL!!

[Big girl]

18 hours ago, UT alum said:

He’s already crawfishing. He had no problem debating Biden on ABC. Why the sudden animosity towards ABC? He ain’t chomping at nothing but Big Macs and chicken strips.

😃😃😃😃😃😃😃😃🤣🤣🤣🤣

[UT alum]

15 hours ago, Reagan said:

He’s gonna have to control is laughter every time she cackles! LOL!!

He has no self control.