Reagan Posted August 7 Report Share Posted August 7 More about the socialist running mate of Obamala: The policies indicate what ideas a potential Harris-Walz administration would prioritize if Democrats defeat former President Donald Trump in November. The policies include: This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up taxes by adding a one percent surtax on net investment income above $1 million. This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up about 81,000 illegal migrants eligible for driver’s licenses. This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up taxpayer funding for free college tuition for illegal migrants. This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up a 20-week taxpayer-paid family and medical leave program. This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up that utilities generate 80 percent carbon-free electricity by 2030. This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up taxpayer funds to subsidize a mandate requiring electric vehicle charging stations with newly constructed buildings. This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up abortion laws, essentially allowing no limits and no age consideration for minors. This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up that Minnesota be a “trans refuge.” This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up election integrity laws by enacting automatic voter registration and a permanent absentee ballot option. This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up a bill to require schools to stock period products in boys’ bathrooms. This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up to allegedly anticipate and react to riots in Minneapolis after the death of George Floyd. Honorable mention: Walz attempted to This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up President Joe Biden’s state of fitness for office in January. @Big girl @UT alum @CardinalBacker @Boyz N Da Hood Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CardinalBacker Posted August 7 Report Share Posted August 7 31 minutes ago, Reagan said: @CardinalBacker @UT alum Trump went to ‘Nam, didn’t he? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TxHoops Posted August 7 Report Share Posted August 7 19 hours ago, LumRaiderFan said: Do any of you liberals have a sense of humor, lol. I wouldn’t call myself a liberal but I’m probably left of most people who post regularly on this board (and right of most of the folks y’all like to argue with except for probably Cardinal Backer). And @AggiesAreWe’s DEI post may be the funniest thing I’ve read on this board that was actually intended to be funny. Of course, when he posts in this forum I’m always on high alert because I know how much he loves the politics portion of this website 😂 AggiesAreWe, Bobcat1 and thetragichippy 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LumRaiderFan Posted August 7 Report Share Posted August 7 5 minutes ago, TxHoops said: I wouldn’t call myself a liberal but I’m probably left of most people who post regularly on this board (and right of most of the folks y’all like to argue with except for probably Cardinal Backer). And @AggiesAreWe’s DEI post may be the funniest thing I’ve read on this board that was actually intended to be funny. Of course, when he posts in this forum I’m always on high alert because I know how much he loves the politics portion of this website 😂 Always enjoyed the back and forth with you, but come to realize we agreed on more than we disagreed on. The post from AAW was funny, I actually laughed out loud on that one. TxHoops 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reagan Posted August 7 Report Share Posted August 7 1 hour ago, CardinalBacker said: Trump went to ‘Nam, didn’t he? Let's compare Kommielina's service and Trump's service. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1989NDN Posted August 7 Report Share Posted August 7 What's to compare? Neither Vice President Harris nor President Trump served in the military. If I remember correctly, President Trump received a deferment and I don't think Vice President Harris enlisted or was drafted. The issue of military service seems to be a wash. Same with education. President Trump has an undergraduate degree in economics. Vice Presidence Harris has an undergraduate degree in political science and she has a law degree. Neither one graduated at or near the top of his/her class. President Trump has had at least four business file for bankruptcy protection. Vice President Harris, none. Granted, I'm not sure that she has been an executive for any business, (I have not looked) but, that said, she hasn't had to file for bankruptcy protection in her personal or professional life. If she had, we would have read about it by now on Fox News or the political forum of www.setxsports.com. So, we know President Trump has experience riding businesses into the ground. Both candidates have allegedly had sex either outside of their own marriage or outside the marriage of their sex partner. Seems the sex life allegations are a wash. Both candidates have said things that aren't true and both candidates have said things they would probably like to take back. (Remember Trump saying he just grabs them [women] by the p---y (vagina)). Posters on this forum like to point out that Vice President Harris is "Heels Up" Harris. Seems honesty and exaggeration from both candidates are about the same. That's a wash. After you get past the personal attacks, and you look at policy, there are differences. Abortion, President Trump says he will leave it to the states; Vice President Harris is pro choice. Seems to me, both candidates are about choice. President Trump will leave the choice to the states; Vice President Harris wants to go one step further and guarantee that a woman has right to make her own choice regardless of which state she lives in. The border, President Trump's wall that Mexico was supposed to pay for, didn't happen. Vice President Harris needs to enforce the laws we have on the books. Most of America thinks than can be accomplished humanely, i.e., not separating families that have some members who are citizens and others who are not. We could could go on and on with issues like the economy, trade, foreign wars, the situation in Ukraine, the Middle East conflict, oil vs. clean energy, pipelines, taxes, Social Security, etc., but it will have to be next time. I need to get back to work. Some moderates (with a slight lean left) do work. We are not all on the governement payroll as some on the right would have you believe. Before I go, one more thing, what does everyone here think about the Cruz v. Allred race? Politics, sex, and religion...my parents' and grandparents' generations always said, don't discuss them in public. My children and grandchildren say, let's discuss. I hate being caught in the middle. Ha-ha. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CardinalBacker Posted August 7 Report Share Posted August 7 5 minutes ago, 1989NDN said: What's to compare? Neither Vice President Harris nor President Trump served in the military. If I remember correctly, President Trump received a deferment and I don't think Vice President Harris enlisted or was drafted. The issue of military service seems to be a wash. Same with education. President Trump has an undergraduate degree in economics. Vice Presidence Harris has an undergraduate degree in political science and she has a law degree. Neither one graduated at or near the top of his/her class. President Trump has had at least four business file for bankruptcy protection. Vice President Harris, none. Granted, I'm not sure that she has been an executive for any business, (I have not looked) but, that said, she hasn't had to file for bankruptcy protection in her personal or professional life. If she had, we would have read about it by now on Fox News or the political forum of www.setxsports.com. So, we know President Trump has experience riding businesses into the ground. Both candidates have allegedly had sex either outside of their own marriage or outside the marriage of their sex partner. Seems the sex life allegations are a wash. Both candidates have said things that aren't true and both candidates have said things they would probably like to take back. (Remember Trump saying he just grabs them [women] by the p---y (vagina)). Posters on this forum like to point out that Vice President Harris is "Heels Up" Harris. Seems honesty and exaggeration from both candidates are about the same. That's a wash. After you get past the personal attacks, and you look at policy, there are differences. Abortion, President Trump says he will leave it to the states; Vice President Harris is pro choice. Seems to me, both candidates are about choice. President Trump will leave the choice to the states; Vice President Harris wants to go one step further and guarantee that a woman has right to make her own choice regardless of which state she lives in. The border, President Trump's wall that Mexico was supposed to pay for, didn't happen. Vice President Harris needs to enforce the laws we have on the books. Most of America thinks than can be accomplished humanely, i.e., not separating families that have some members who are citizens and others who are not. We could could go on and on with issues like the economy, trade, foreign wars, the situation in Ukraine, the Middle East conflict, oil vs. clean energy, pipelines, taxes, Social Security, etc., but it will have to be next time. I need to get back to work. Some moderates (with a slight lean left) do work. We are not all on the governement payroll as some on the right would have you believe. Before I go, one more thing, what does everyone here think about the Cruz v. Allred race? Politics, sex, and religion...my parents' and grandparents' generations always said, don't discuss them in public. My children and grandchildren say, let's discuss. I hate being caught in the middle. Ha-ha. You're not wrong anywhere... but the main thing to remember is politics is about getting elected, first and foremost. Electability is much more important that policies, because IF a candidate with the "right" policies loses, he/she won't be implementing many policies, now will they? Which candidate your beliefs align with more closely might be important to you, but if you hitch your wagon to a lame horse that you really, really like.... you're not going far. Sure, we want to hear the politician's policies, but at the end of the day, it all comes down to who can garner the most electoral college votes... and Trump and his followers are out there saying "I don't need Dems.... I don't need Rinos... I don't need Hispanics... I don't need blacks.... I don't need women... I don't even need the Republicans I don't like... if MAGA turns out, I will win, because my policies are better." That's how you take another big ol' "L" on election day. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LumRaiderFan Posted August 7 Report Share Posted August 7 3 minutes ago, CardinalBacker said: You're not wrong anywhere... but the main thing to remember is politics is about getting elected, first and foremost. Electability is much more important that policies, because IF a candidate with the "right" policies loses, he/she won't be implementing many policies, now will they? Which candidate your beliefs align with more closely might be important to you, but if you hitch your wagon to a lame horse that you really, really like.... you're not going far. Sure, we want to hear the politician's policies, but at the end of the day, it all comes down to who can garner the most electoral college votes... and Trump and his followers are out there saying "I don't need Dems.... I don't need Rinos... I don't need Hispanics... I don't need blacks.... I don't need women... I don't even need the Republicans I don't like... if MAGA turns out, I will win, because my policies are better." That's how you take another big ol' "L" on election day. lol, nobody is saying any of that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CardinalBacker Posted August 7 Report Share Posted August 7 11 minutes ago, 1989NDN said: What's to compare? Neither Vice President Harris nor President Trump served in the military. If I remember correctly, President Trump received a deferment and I don't think Vice President Harris enlisted or was drafted. The issue of military service seems to be a wash. Same with education. President Trump has an undergraduate degree in economics. Vice Presidence Harris has an undergraduate degree in political science and she has a law degree. Neither one graduated at or near the top of his/her class. President Trump has had at least four business file for bankruptcy protection. Vice President Harris, none. Granted, I'm not sure that she has been an executive for any business, (I have not looked) but, that said, she hasn't had to file for bankruptcy protection in her personal or professional life. If she had, we would have read about it by now on Fox News or the political forum of www.setxsports.com. So, we know President Trump has experience riding businesses into the ground. Both candidates have allegedly had sex either outside of their own marriage or outside the marriage of their sex partner. Seems the sex life allegations are a wash. Both candidates have said things that aren't true and both candidates have said things they would probably like to take back. (Remember Trump saying he just grabs them [women] by the p---y (vagina)). Posters on this forum like to point out that Vice President Harris is "Heels Up" Harris. Seems honesty and exaggeration from both candidates are about the same. That's a wash. After you get past the personal attacks, and you look at policy, there are differences. Abortion, President Trump says he will leave it to the states; Vice President Harris is pro choice. Seems to me, both candidates are about choice. President Trump will leave the choice to the states; Vice President Harris wants to go one step further and guarantee that a woman has right to make her own choice regardless of which state she lives in. The border, President Trump's wall that Mexico was supposed to pay for, didn't happen. Vice President Harris needs to enforce the laws we have on the books. Most of America thinks than can be accomplished humanely, i.e., not separating families that have some members who are citizens and others who are not. We could could go on and on with issues like the economy, trade, foreign wars, the situation in Ukraine, the Middle East conflict, oil vs. clean energy, pipelines, taxes, Social Security, etc., but it will have to be next time. I need to get back to work. Some moderates (with a slight lean left) do work. We are not all on the governement payroll as some on the right would have you believe. Before I go, one more thing, what does everyone here think about the Cruz v. Allred race? Politics, sex, and religion...my parents' and grandparents' generations always said, don't discuss them in public. My children and grandchildren say, let's discuss. I hate being caught in the middle. Ha-ha. I think Cruz should win a race that is closer than it should be. I'm a little concerned that there will be down-ticket carnage caused by the Presidential dust-up. Texas is still red, but it won't be for much longer. The Rs are squandering a huge opportunity to bring home the Hispanic vote for generations, but instead we want to talk about "building walls" and "the largest deportation operation in modern history" if Trump gets elected. That affects the illegals of course, but it also threatens the legal citizens who know/love people who will be sent away if Trump's plan goes into effect. Somebody who supports deportation will immediately scream "you know who is in favor of deportations? Immigrants who are here legally." But do you know who never actually makes that claim for themselves? Immigrants who are here legally. It's always some soon-to-retire white guy with a really red complexion and spittle on the corner of his mouth yelling it out on behalf of the unseen legal immigrants. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CardinalBacker Posted August 7 Report Share Posted August 7 Just now, LumRaiderFan said: lol, nobody is saying any of that. Yes, sir... by words and actions. That's exactly what MAGA says. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LumRaiderFan Posted August 7 Report Share Posted August 7 6 minutes ago, CardinalBacker said: Yes, sir... by words and actions. That's exactly what MAGA says. Nobody is saying that, it's simply Trump's voice in your head. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reagan Posted August 7 Report Share Posted August 7 Coup-Mala Harris Chooses Tampon Tim as VP with Deep Ties to Communist China: Tim Walz Visited China Over 30 Times, Had a Special Work Visa, Set Up a Student Program to Travel in China, and Even Honeymooned There! This falls in line with him being a socialist/communist! This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up @Big girl @CardinalBacker @UT alum Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big girl Posted August 7 Report Share Posted August 7 2 hours ago, CardinalBacker said: I think Cruz should win a race that is closer than it should be. I'm a little concerned that there will be down-ticket carnage caused by the Presidential dust-up. Texas is still red, but it won't be for much longer. The Rs are squandering a huge opportunity to bring home the Hispanic vote for generations, but instead we want to talk about "building walls" and "the largest deportation operation in modern history" if Trump gets elected. That affects the illegals of course, but it also threatens the legal citizens who know/love people who will be sent away if Trump's plan goes into effect. Somebody who supports deportation will immediately scream "you know who is in favor of deportations? Immigrants who are here legally." But do you know who never actually makes that claim for themselves? Immigrants who are here legally. It's always some soon-to-retire white guy with a really red complexion and spittle on the corner of his mouth yelling it out on behalf of the unseen legal immigrants. Lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big girl Posted August 7 Report Share Posted August 7 1 hour ago, Reagan said: Coup-Mala Harris Chooses Tampon Tim as VP with Deep Ties to Communist China: Tim Walz Visited China Over 30 Times, Had a Special Work Visa, Set Up a Student Program to Travel in China, and Even Honeymooned There! This falls in line with him being a socialist/communist! This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up @Big girl @CardinalBacker @UT alum Omg, the lies. He does not have ties to the Chinese government. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reagan Posted August 8 Report Share Posted August 8 As Somali Gangs Waged War and Trafficked Children In Minnesota, Tim Walz Asked for More Somali Refugees! Minnesota is a sanctuary state. Immediately, Abbott and DeSantis needs to flood Minnesota with illegals! This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reagan Posted August 8 Report Share Posted August 8 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LumRaiderFan Posted August 8 Report Share Posted August 8 This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up From the article: A veteran who served with Kamala Harris running mate Gov. Tim Walz accused him of embellishing his time in the service and abandoning his unit just before they deployed. In an interview Wednesday on "The Ingraham Angle," Ret. Command Sgt. Maj. Thomas Behrends, who said he was a member of Walz's battalion, scolded the Minnesota governor for misleading the American public about his military career. His service concluded when he retired from his unit in the Minnesota National Guard right before they deployed to Iraq in 2005, the New York Post reported. The Minnesota National Guard told Fox News Walz's unit was not given deployment orders to Iraq until July and he had put his retirement papers in five to seven months prior to his retirement in that May 2005. Asked about Trump running mate Sen. JD Vance's accusation that Walz is guilty of "stolen valor," the National Guard veteran told Fox News host Laura Ingraham that it's "far darker than a lot of people think." "He's used the rank that he never achieved in order to advance his political career," he said. "I mean, he still says he's a retired command sergeant major to this day, and he's not. He uses the rank of others to make it look like he's a better person than he is." Reagan 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big girl Posted August 8 Report Share Posted August 8 39 minutes ago, LumRaiderFan said: This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up From the article: A veteran who served with Kamala Harris running mate Gov. Tim Walz accused him of embellishing his time in the service and abandoning his unit just before they deployed. In an interview Wednesday on "The Ingraham Angle," Ret. Command Sgt. Maj. Thomas Behrends, who said he was a member of Walz's battalion, scolded the Minnesota governor for misleading the American public about his military career. His service concluded when he retired from his unit in the Minnesota National Guard right before they deployed to Iraq in 2005, the New York Post reported. The Minnesota National Guard told Fox News Walz's unit was not given deployment orders to Iraq until July and he had put his retirement papers in five to seven months prior to his retirement in that May 2005. Asked about Trump running mate Sen. JD Vance's accusation that Walz is guilty of "stolen valor," the National Guard veteran told Fox News host Laura Ingraham that it's "far darker than a lot of people think." "He's used the rank that he never achieved in order to advance his political career," he said. "I mean, he still says he's a retired command sergeant major to this day, and he's not. He uses the rank of others to make it look like he's a better person than he is." You are wrong Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LumRaiderFan Posted August 8 Report Share Posted August 8 36 minutes ago, Big girl said: You are wrong I've got nothing to do with this, it's a statement from a veteran that served with Walzs. You stating I am wrong means absolutely nothing, post something that proves this veteran wrong. Your VP pick is a loser on all counts, he established a covid hotline for neighbors to tell on each other if someone wasn't following the rules. He does, however, fit right in with your pick for President, lol. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bobcat1 Posted August 8 Author Report Share Posted August 8 23 hours ago, TxHoops said: I wouldn’t call myself a liberal but I’m probably left of most people who post regularly on this board (and right of most of the folks y’all like to argue with except for probably Cardinal Backer). And @AggiesAreWe’s DEI post may be the funniest thing I’ve read on this board that was actually intended to be funny. Of course, when he posts in this forum I’m always on high alert because I know how much he loves the politics portion of this website 😂 SAME! All of that, same! TxHoops 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reagan Posted August 8 Report Share Posted August 8 They Might Have Sabotaged Kamala's Ticket on Purpose! I mean, think about it: Why would they put a socialist/communist on the ticket? It's either to sabotage it or this is actually what they've become. Because to be perfectly honest, Tampon Tim is Walzo Bizarro!! This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Trump 2024 -- Too Big To Rig! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reagan Posted August 8 Report Share Posted August 8 Wayne Root: Democrats Made Biggest Mistake in History by Picking Tim Walz. All Because “NO JEWS ALLOWED.” I Call This “Divine Intervention.” This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reagan Posted August 8 Report Share Posted August 8 Minnesota Gov. Tampon Tim Walz, aka Walzo Bazarro, who debuted as Vice President Obamala Harris’s campaign running mate on Tuesday, reportedly chose to get married on the anniversary of the Tiananmen Square massacre and honeymooned in communist China. Ex NY Mayor DeBlasio honeymooned in Cuba. Bernie Sanders honeymooned in the Soviet Union. Folks -- this is what communist do!! This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up @Big girl @UT alum Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AggiesAreWe Posted August 8 Report Share Posted August 8 On 8/7/2024 at 1:19 PM, TxHoops said: I wouldn’t call myself a liberal but I’m probably left of most people who post regularly on this board (and right of most of the folks y’all like to argue with except for probably Cardinal Backer). And @AggiesAreWe’s DEI post may be the funniest thing I’ve read on this board that was actually intended to be funny. Of course, when he posts in this forum I’m always on high alert because I know how much he loves the politics portion of this website 😂 Maybe I am just bored sitting down here on the beach. lol Just ready for all this crap to be over (but know it never will). Ready for high school football games to start and then more importantly, high school basketball. Helps occupy my mind. Mr. Buddy Garrity, TxHoops and thetragichippy 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LumRaiderFan Posted August 8 Report Share Posted August 8 7 hours ago, Big girl said: You are wrong This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.