Jump to content

First conviction in Arizona fake electors case as Republican activist pleads guilty


Bobcat1

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, HuntersLaptop2028 said:

Dang no one cares about this topic, huh? 

I genuinely wonder why 

Because it is political prosecution.

If you notice, the people with money or political support have plead NOT guilty,  The others have plead guilty to avoid bankruptcy. 

This is the exact same thing going on with jan 6th defendants. The government with unlimited resources says plead guilty and spend 2 -4 years in jail....or fight this think until you lose everything you own, and still face the possibility of jail time.....or you may get off and we let you go homeless and broke.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, thetragichippy said:

Because it is political prosecution.

If you notice, the people with money or political support have plead NOT guilty,  The others have plead guilty to avoid bankruptcy. 

This is the exact same thing going on with jan 6th defendants. The government with unlimited resources says plead guilty and spend 2 -4 years in jail....or fight this think until you lose everything you own, and still face the possibility of jail time.....or you may get off and we let you go homeless and broke.


 

Well Fox News paid $800 MILLION, for lying. Folded like a lawn chair, and they definitely have resources to argue in court.

Was this political prosecution too?

At some point.. you gotta realize you’ve been lied to and brainwashed. 
 

 

WILMINGTON, Del. (AP) — Fox News agreed Tuesday to pay Dominion Voting Systems nearly $800 million to avert a trial in the voting machine company’s lawsuit that would have exposed how the network promoted lies about the 2020 presidential election.

The stunning settlement emerged just as opening statements were supposed to begin, abruptly ending a case that had 

This is the hidden content, please
Fox News over several months and raised the possibility that network founder Rupert Murdoch and stars such as Tucker Carlson and Sean Hannity would have to testify publicly.

“The truth matters. Lies have consequences,” Dominion lawyer Justin Nelson told reporters outside a Delaware courthouse after Superior Court Judge Eric Davis announced the deal.

Outside of the $787.5 million promised to Colorado-based Dominion, it was unclear what other consequences Fox would face. Fox acknowledged in a statement “the court’s rulings finding certain claims about Dominion to be false,” but no apology was offered.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, HuntersLaptop2028 said:


 

Well Fox News paid $800 MILLION, for lying. Folded like a lawn chair, and they definitely have resources to argue in court.

Was this political prosecution too?

At some point.. you gotta realize you’ve been lied to and brainwashed. 
 

 

 

WILMINGTON, Del. (AP) — Fox News agreed Tuesday to pay Dominion Voting Systems nearly $800 million to avert a trial in the voting machine company’s lawsuit that would have exposed how the network promoted lies about the 2020 presidential election.

The stunning settlement emerged just as opening statements were supposed to begin, abruptly ending a case that had 

This is the hidden content, please
Fox News over several months and raised the possibility that network founder Rupert Murdoch and stars such as Tucker Carlson and Sean Hannity would have to testify publicly.

“The truth matters. Lies have consequences,” Dominion lawyer Justin Nelson told reporters outside a Delaware courthouse after Superior Court Judge Eric Davis announced the deal.

Outside of the $787.5 million promised to Colorado-based Dominion, it was unclear what other consequences Fox would face. Fox acknowledged in a statement “the court’s rulings finding certain claims about Dominion to be false,” but no apology was offered.

Fox being sued.....Like CNN being sued (remember the indian situation) has nothing to do with these lawsuits......and nothing to do with my comments. That is really really bad  deflection.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, thetragichippy said:

again - nothing to do with my comment of political prosecution.....

How about you stick to the subject and not get personal......  

 

It is sticking to the subject. You think it’s just political prosecution. Fox News settling for $800 million is very relevant as it directly contradicts your argument that “people with money and resources have NOT plead guilty”

This is obviously a lie and there’s been zero proof. You are being lied to. You keep falling for the lies. You will continue to keep falling for the lies.

Is there anything that would change your mind? I don’t think there is but let me know.. genuinely curious.
 

I think you are far too deep and committed and this point and know you can’t turn back now. Just my opinion. There’s no way a rationale person can’t keep believing this stuff

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, HuntersLaptop2028 said:

Fox News settling for $800 million is very relevant as it directly contradicts your argument that “people with money and resources have NOT plead guilty”

#1. The government did not charge Fox news with anything

#2 FOX made a business decision

The Government was charging Jan 6 defendants with long sentences ....They were pleading to avoid bankruptcy and the possibility of long sentences. Luckily the supreme court ruling shut most of that down with the unconstitutional obstruction charges they were trying to make. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, thetragichippy said:

#1. The government did not charge Fox news with anything

#2 FOX made a business decision

The Government was charging Jan 6 defendants with long sentences ....They were pleading to avoid bankruptcy and the possibility of long sentences. Luckily the supreme court ruling shut most of that down with the unconstitutional obstruction charges they were trying to make. 


And the business decision was.. settle for $800 million, or eventually lose over $1 billion because they know they’re FOS.

There’s zero proof dude.

ZERO

Just give it up already. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/17/2024 at 12:47 PM, thetragichippy said:

#1. The government did not charge Fox news with anything

#2 FOX made a business decision

The Government was charging Jan 6 defendants with long sentences ....They were pleading to avoid bankruptcy and the possibility of long sentences. Luckily the supreme court ruling shut most of that down with the unconstitutional obstruction charges they were trying to make. 

They were guilty 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/16/2024 at 12:23 PM, thetragichippy said:

Because it is political prosecution.

If you notice, the people with money or political support have plead NOT guilty,  The others have plead guilty to avoid bankruptcy. 

This is the exact same thing going on with jan 6th defendants. The government with unlimited resources says plead guilty and spend 2 -4 years in jail....or fight this think until you lose everything you own, and still face the possibility of jail time.....or you may get off and we let you go homeless and broke.

How do you know about all those Arizonans net worth? Breitbart?
Trump danged sure ain’t gonna bail ‘em out. His PACs should help them if they can’t afford it. Thing is, he helps no one but himself. Did they plea to reduced charges? Maybe they were guilty. Did that thought enter your universe?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, UT alum said:

How do you know about all those Arizonans net worth? Breitbart?
Trump danged sure ain’t gonna bail ‘em out. His PACs should help them if they can’t afford it. Thing is, he helps no one but himself. Did they plea to reduced charges? Maybe they were guilty. Did that thought enter your universe?

HE can't help everyone. That is what they are trying to do - hit him everywhere, make him pay ridiculous fines and legal cost hoping to bankrupt him......Didn't work tho......But he can pardon them in 2024

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, HuntersLaptop2028 said:

@thetragichippy question - is there anything on earth that would change your mind on this topic? 
 

Or are you dead set no matter what, with zero proof. 

Not dead set - but I have yet to see anything that would change my mind yet.

Let's put it this way. Name one person who has been investigated more than Trump by the Government. From phone calls to states or foreign governments to attorney client privilege issues.....shopping Judges in Democratic friendly states...... The Supreme Court had to get involved......and I don't believe it's over......History will be kind to trump.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, thetragichippy said:

Not dead set - but I have yet to see anything that would change my mind yet.

Let's put it this way. Name one person who has been investigated more than Trump by the Government. From phone calls to states or foreign governments to attorney client privilege issues.....shopping Judges in Democratic friendly states...... The Supreme Court had to get involved......and I don't believe it's over......History will be kind to trump.....

He’s also the most openly corrupt and divisive president ever, so makes sense he’s under multiple investigations

I think history will be very unkind to both trump and Biden but guess we’ll see  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, thetragichippy said:

Divisive yes - but that was his appeal in my opinion. 

You don't find it odd this corrupt billionaire  guy never had any criminal investigations UNTIL he became President?

 

The divisiveness was cool and funny, for about 1-2 years.

Dude his son in law got a $2 BILLION check from Saudi Arabia right after trump left office.. you gonna sit here and put your head in the sand pretending that didn’t happen?

You guys bend the knee no matter what. It’s honestly very sad. How can presumably once normal people fall to this level of denial. Something is off. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,202
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    Aclark1510
    Newest Member
    Aclark1510
    Joined


  • Posts

    • Resumes' matter. No, they don't win games but they matter. LP has a much better resume' this year, while BH had to scratch to get into the playoff, and has an almost all Soph fill in skill team. LP is easily the favorite.     
    • I woke up this morning with an Eagle flying overhead, being the good tracker I am i believe it's an omen and the Igles will pull this one out. My brain says LP but the Eagle said BH. 
    • This is the same Gball team that gave up like 50 to BH right? AMC either had a bad night or that district is a paper tiger. 
    • Friday schedule (coverage area teams) Division I 10:30am         Barbers Hill vs. Lake Travis  (Dobie 9) 10:30am         Summer Creek vs. The Colony  (Phillips FH) 12pm              Denton Guyer vs. Atascocita  (South Houston HS) 4:30pm           Barbers Hill/Lake Travis winner vs. Grand Oaks/North Crowley winner  (Dobie HS) 4:30pm           Summer Creek/The Colony winner vs. Richardson/Katy Paetow winner  (Deer Park) 4:30pm           Barbers Hill/Lake Travis loser vs. Grand Oaks/North Crowley loser  (Memorial HS) 4:30pm           Summer Creek/The Colony loser vs. Richardson/Katy Paetow loser  (Sam Rayburn HS) 6pm                Denton Guyer/Atascocita winner vs. South Grand Prairie/FB Marshall winner  (Memorial HS) 6pm                Denton Guyer/Atascocita loser vs. South Grand Prairie/FB Marshall loser  (Sam Rayburn HS)   Division II 9am               Klein Cain vs. Pasadena     (Pasadena HS) 10:30am        Baytown Sterling vs. Midway  (Pasadena HS) 10:30am        Goose Creek Memorial vs. Pearland Dawson  (South Houston HS) 12pm             Crosby vs. South Houston  (Phillips FH) 12pm             North Shore vs. Pasadena Memorial  (Memorial HS) 3pm              Klein Cain/Pasadena winner vs. FB Dulles/Randle winner  (Phillips FH) 3pm              Klein Cain/Pasadena loser vs. FB Dulles/Randle loser  (Memorial HS) 4:30pm         Baytown Sterling/Midway winner vs. La Porte/Pasadena Dobie winner (Phillips FH) 4:30pm         Baytown Sterling/Midway loser vs. La Porte/Pasadena Dobie loser (South Houston HS) 4:30pm         Goose Creek Memorial/Pearland Dawson winner vs. Katy Taylor/Manvel winner  (Pasadena HS) 4:30pm         Goose Creek Memorial/Pearland Dawson loser vs. Katy Taylor/Manvel loser  (Deer Park HS) 6pm             Crosby/South Houston winner vs. Angleton/JJ Pearce winner  (Deer Park HS) 6pm             Crosby/South Houston loser vs. Angleton/JJ Pearce loser  (Deer Park Aux)  
    • Say that then. Don't just stop at i am pro-life. Thanks for the clarification.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...