baddog Posted August 16 Report Share Posted August 16 25 minutes ago, Big girl said: Duh. Why the duh? They were installed in boy’s bathrooms in grades 4-12. That was for the females who happened to go into the wrong bathroom? Your whole way of thinking is “DUH”. In your professional (I use the term loosely) opinion, does a human with X/Y chromosomes menstruate? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thetragichippy Posted August 16 Report Share Posted August 16 4 hours ago, CardinalBacker said: What’s your fascination with tampons? Probably the same as mine.....fascinated that anyone would think they belong in a boys restroom...... Reagan 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thetragichippy Posted August 16 Report Share Posted August 16 21 hours ago, bullets13 said: It's a shame this won't move the needle more, but there's so much baggage already floating around this is small potatoes. There is some discussion on X from some pretty smart guys, specifically (shipwreckedcrew). He spent 22 years as a federal prosecutor, now he is representing Jan 6 defendants for donations, since the government is trying to bankrupt them or make them plead guilty. Anyway, he makes an argument that the Democrats don't want Kamala, but could not bypass her due to optics. Plus if she wins, they are stuck with her for 8 years. So they are letting her run, knowing she will likely lose, then they can run someone strong in 2028. He explains it a little better, but it does make sense. You know as well as I do, she is not near the best the Dems have to offer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CardinalBacker Posted August 16 Report Share Posted August 16 2 hours ago, 5GallonBucket said: Taken out of context. Good job Thank you, ma’am. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
baddog Posted August 16 Report Share Posted August 16 Walz is a lush, Kamala is a pot headed sleep around, and we already know cocaine was found in the WH……a partying bunch of fools already in the WH who aren’t keeping watch over our country. We don’t need more brain dead people in there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
5GallonBucket Posted August 16 Report Share Posted August 16 32 minutes ago, CardinalBacker said: Thank you, ma’am. Your welcome troll Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LumRaiderFan Posted August 16 Report Share Posted August 16 17 hours ago, Big girl said: I think that you are jealous of my 2 degrees, and my six figure income. That I was forced to pay for because you refused to. thetragichippy 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thetragichippy Posted August 16 Report Share Posted August 16 17 hours ago, Big girl said: I think that you are jealous of my 2 degrees, and my six figure income. I'm 100% sure there are many folks on this forum who have degrees, even multiple, and probably many more with and without degrees that make six figure........ Oddly, you are the ONLY one that needed to state that. So my take is you are being untruthful or you are a very insecure person that needs to tell people their self worth. LumRaiderFan and baddog 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bullets13 Posted August 16 Author Report Share Posted August 16 2 hours ago, thetragichippy said: There is some discussion on X from some pretty smart guys, specifically (shipwreckedcrew). He spent 22 years as a federal prosecutor, now he is representing Jan 6 defendants for donations, since the government is trying to bankrupt them or make them plead guilty. Anyway, he makes an argument that the Democrats don't want Kamala, but could not bypass her due to optics. Plus if she wins, they are stuck with her for 8 years. So they are letting her run, knowing she will likely lose, then they can run someone strong in 2028. He explains it a little better, but it does make sense. You know as well as I do, she is not near the best the Dems have to offer. Man, I reaaaaally don't think she's losing. Maybe some of her polling numbers got a little inflated with the buzz around her getting the nod, and will drop a little. But the Donald appears to be getting desperate. One of the things I'd noticed was that a few months back he seemed to be calming down a little, not making as many outlandish statements, tamping down on the insults. It was working for him, too. But now he feels it slipping away, and he's doing and saying crazy stuff again. It may get his disciples fired up, but it's not gonna help him with the votes he's going to need to win. I guess we'll see. Your guy on X is right about one thing: she's a weak candidate. My prediction is that Harris wins this election, does a poor to mediocre job, and the next election the republicans take the white house back, IF we nominate anyone halfway electable. So help me, if Trump loses again and these dipsticks spend four years whining about stolen elections and then nominate him again for 2028, i'm done with the party. This year should've been the easiest republican win since Reagan in 84, but we found a way to possibly screw it up. Mr. Buddy Garrity, CardinalBacker and HuntersLaptop2028 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CardinalBacker Posted August 16 Report Share Posted August 16 30 minutes ago, bullets13 said: Man, I reaaaaally don't think she's losing. Maybe some of her polling numbers got a little inflated with the buzz around her getting the nod, and will drop a little. But the Donald appears to be getting desperate. One of the things I'd noticed was that a few months back he seemed to be calming down a little, not making as many outlandish statements, tamping down on the insults. It was working for him, too. But now he feels it slipping away, and he's doing and saying crazy stuff again. It may get his disciples fired up, but it's not gonna help him with the votes he's going to need to win. I guess we'll see. Your guy on X is right about one thing: she's a weak candidate. My prediction is that Harris wins this election, does a poor to mediocre job, and the next election the republicans take the white house back, IF we nominate anyone halfway electable. So help me, if Trump loses again and these dipsticks spend four years whining about stolen elections and then nominate him again for 2028, i'm done with the party. This year should've been the easiest republican win since Reagan in 84, but we found a way to possibly screw it up. My Man!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boyz N Da Hood Posted August 16 Report Share Posted August 16 32 minutes ago, bullets13 said: Man, I reaaaaally don't think she's losing. Maybe some of her polling numbers got a little inflated with the buzz around her getting the nod, and will drop a little. But the Donald appears to be getting desperate. One of the things I'd noticed was that a few months back he seemed to be calming down a little, not making as many outlandish statements, tamping down on the insults. It was working for him, too. But now he feels it slipping away, and he's doing and saying crazy stuff again. It may get his disciples fired up, but it's not gonna help him with the votes he's going to need to win. I guess we'll see. Your guy on X is right about one thing: she's a weak candidate. My prediction is that Harris wins this election, does a poor to mediocre job, and the next election the republicans take the white house back, IF we nominate anyone halfway electable. So help me, if Trump loses again and these dipsticks spend four years whining about stolen elections and then nominate him again for 2028, i'm done with the party. This year should've been the easiest republican win since Reagan in 84, but we found a way to possibly screw it up. BINGO!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HuntersLaptop2028 Posted August 16 Report Share Posted August 16 2 hours ago, bullets13 said: Man, I reaaaaally don't think she's losing. Maybe some of her polling numbers got a little inflated with the buzz around her getting the nod, and will drop a little. But the Donald appears to be getting desperate. One of the things I'd noticed was that a few months back he seemed to be calming down a little, not making as many outlandish statements, tamping down on the insults. It was working for him, too. But now he feels it slipping away, and he's doing and saying crazy stuff again. It may get his disciples fired up, but it's not gonna help him with the votes he's going to need to win. I guess we'll see. Your guy on X is right about one thing: she's a weak candidate. My prediction is that Harris wins this election, does a poor to mediocre job, and the next election the republicans take the white house back, IF we nominate anyone halfway electable. So help me, if Trump loses again and these dipsticks spend four years whining about stolen elections and then nominate him again for 2028, i'm done with the party. This year should've been the easiest republican win since Reagan in 84, but we found a way to possibly screw it up. Check out Glenn Youngkin out of VA. A real businessman. Not a trust fund, bankrupt everything he touches con man like 80 year old trump. He’d be such a huge upgrade but I’m sure the MAGAs will find a way to ruin it (again) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BS Wildcats Posted August 16 Report Share Posted August 16 On 8/15/2024 at 3:55 PM, Big girl said: Yep, but they were not pretending to be great Christians, the 2nd coming of Christ, as some say. Nor did they endorse bibles. FYI, I was not alive when JFK was President. Did Trump say he was the 2nd coming of Christ? So, let me see if I can understand your babbling. Since neither proclaimed to be “great” Christians, whatever that means, it seems you are ok with their adultery. I guess if they were Republicans, you would be brow beating the hell out of them. You are the poster child for two-facedness. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BS Wildcats Posted August 16 Report Share Posted August 16 On 8/15/2024 at 3:54 PM, Big girl said: Neither did Walz Huh?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big girl Posted August 16 Report Share Posted August 16 On 8/15/2024 at 1:24 PM, bullets13 said: This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up That was in 2006. It is now 2024. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big girl Posted August 16 Report Share Posted August 16 17 minutes ago, BS Wildcats said: Did Trump say he was the 2nd coming of Christ? So, let me see if I can understand your babbling. Since neither proclaimed to be “great” Christians, whatever that means, it seems you are ok with their adultery. I guess if they were Republicans, you would be brow beating the hell out of them. You are the poster child for two-facedness. Nope. Evangelicals think he is. Why was he endorsing Bibles? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big girl Posted August 16 Report Share Posted August 16 5 hours ago, baddog said: Walz is a lush, Kamala is a pot headed sleep around, and we already know cocaine was found in the WH……a partying bunch of fools already in the WH who aren’t keeping watch over our country. We don’t need more brain dead people in there. Do you know all of her sexual partners or are you listening to hearsay? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big girl Posted August 16 Report Share Posted August 16 4 hours ago, LumRaiderFan said: That I was forced to pay for because you refused to. .yeah right. My first degree was paid for by Texas A&M. I paid for the second one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big girl Posted August 16 Report Share Posted August 16 5 hours ago, baddog said: Why the duh? They were installed in boy’s bathrooms in grades 4-12. That was for the females who happened to go into the wrong bathroom? Your whole way of thinking is “DUH”. In your professional (I use the term loosely) opinion, does a human with X/Y chromosomes menstruate? This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
baddog Posted August 16 Report Share Posted August 16 3 minutes ago, Big girl said: This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up That proves my point. Male/female Boy/Girl No tampons/tampons. There is no third gender. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bullets13 Posted August 16 Author Report Share Posted August 16 39 minutes ago, Big girl said: That was in 2006. It is now 2024. Trump is (correctly) criticized by the left for misleading statements and lies. Not sure why it doesn’t work the other way, especially since a lot of his lies were used to get into office to begin with Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BS Wildcats Posted August 16 Report Share Posted August 16 1 hour ago, Big girl said: Nope. Evangelicals think he is. Why was he endorsing Bibles? You implied it was Trump. Maybe you should be more clear. Is there a problem with someone endorsing The Bible? You do know it is the best selling book of all time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big girl Posted August 17 Report Share Posted August 17 2 hours ago, bullets13 said: Trump is (correctly) criticized by the left for misleading statements and lies. Not sure why it doesn’t work the other way, especially since a lot of his lies were used to get into office to begin with He made them in 06. I am sure a big deal was made then Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big girl Posted August 17 Report Share Posted August 17 2 hours ago, baddog said: That proves my point. Male/female Boy/Girl No tampons/tampons. There is no third gender. Per snopes Democratic vice presidential nominee and Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz signed a bill requiring schools to stock tampons in boys' bathrooms. Rating: This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big girl Posted August 17 Report Share Posted August 17 9 hours ago, baddog said: Why the duh? They were installed in boy’s bathrooms in grades 4-12. That was for the females who happened to go into the wrong bathroom? Your whole way of thinking is “DUH”. In your professional (I use the term loosely) opinion, does a human with X/Y chromosomes menstruate? FYI Some women are born with a XY known as 46,XY complete gonadal dysgenesis, is a rare genetic condition that affects sex development. People with Swyer syndrome have XY chromosomes, like boys, but female external genitalia and some female internal reproductive structures, like a uterus and fallopian tubes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.